G Model
APCATA-15688; No. of Pages12
ARTICLE IN PRESS
I. Jansson et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General xxx (2016) xxx–xxx
8
Zeolite/WO –Pt hybrids are reported in Table 1. Due to its low
Diffuse reflectance spectra of the solids are shown in Fig. 3.
As observed, the spectra show a significant increase of the light
3
surface area, WO –Pt showed poor adsorption ability for both the
3
aldehyde and the organochloride compound. On the other hand,
zeolites showed significantly greater adsorption ability, mostly
towards AcH adsorption. Electrostatically polarized or unbalanced
sites of zeolites can act as strong adsorption sites for organic
molecules, especially for polar molecules such as acetaldehyde
absorbance for the Zeolite/WO –Pt hybrids within the wavelength
range between 400 and 450 nm as compared to benchmark TiO2.
3
Note that Z1/WO –Pt has the lowest adsorption of light within
3
this range in the series. Being UV–vis transparent materials, WO3-
free zeolites record no UV–vis absorption response. The reflectance
[
29]. Notwithstanding of the nature of the adsorbed compound,
spectra of the zeolites containing WO –Pt exhibit a background
3
the adsorption ability of zeolites mainly influenced by two param-
eters: the Si/Al ratio and the zeolite structure. Thus, ZSM-5 zeolites
exhibit greater adsorption ability than Zeolite Y at the same Si/Al
ratio. Moreover, an inverse relationship between the Si/Al ratio
and the adsorption ability at dynamic conditions was observed.
Thus, irrespectively of the zeolite structure or the textural prop-
erties (BET area or total pore volume), less hydrophobic and acidic
zeolites tend to have a higher capacity to adsorb both VOC. Regard-
ing Zeolite/WO –Pt hybrid materials, the incorporation of WO –Pt
slightly higher than that of pure TiO2 probably due to the pres-
ence of Pt [36]. The absorption edge for the Zeolite/WO –Pt samples
3
shifts to ca. 450 nm. Assuming that the electronic structure of WO3
allows an indirect transition as TiO2 [37], a plot of the modified
Kubelka–Munk function vs. the energy of the exciting light affords
band gap energy of 2.55–2.60 eV for the Zeolite/WO –Pt photocata-
3
lysts except for Z5/WO –Pt with a band gap of 2.45 eV. These values
3
are consistent with the characteristic values reported for WO3
materials, which range from 2.40 to 2.80 eV [38]. Since all the cata-
3
3
leads to a reduction of the amount of adsorbed organic compounds.
This feature can be attributed to the low adsorption capacity of the
lysts contain the same amount of WO –Pt, ideally the absorbance in
3
the spectra should coincide with each other. The band gap redshift
observed with the Si/Al ratio, and specially relevant when com-
pared Z1 and Z5 based composites, could be related to the presence
of tungsten oxide species of different nature, anchored on the sur-
WO –Pt phase and the lower zeolite content on the final compos-
3
ite. Our results suggest that the textural properties, such as the
BET area and pore volume are not relevant factors to determine
the adsorption ability of the studied molecules in dynamic condi-
tions in contrast to other authors [30]. Takeuchi et al. reported that
face of strong acid sites. The deposit of the WO –Pt on the zeolites
3
leads to APHs capable of adsorbing light within the visible region,
revealing its potential application for degradation of pollutants
under visible irradiation conditions. The nature of tungsten oxide
species were investigated by XPS. Fig. 4 shows the W 4f core-level
region spectra for the zeolitic materials. All W-containing samples
show similar spectra in this B.E. region, with the 4f7/2 peak cen-
tred at ca. 35.0 eV indicative of the presence of oxidized W species,
probably as W6+ [10]. As observed, increasing the Si/Al ratio in the
zeolite shifts the B.E. of the W 4f7/2 peak from 34.8 eV to 35.2 eV.
This shift to higher B.E.s indicates the formation of more oxidized
tungsten species on the zeolites with stronger acid sites, probably
highly hydrophobic H-ZSM-5 with low Al O3 content was effec-
2
tive as an adsorbent for acetaldehyde molecules [31]. The Si/Al
ratio may modify the unit cell size and the void volume for VOC
adsorption. Thus, cell parameters were determined by XRD using
Cu K␣, ꢀ = 1.5406 A˚ refined by the Rietveld method [32], with the
Fullprof refinement program [33]. Z1 and Z2 crystal structures have
been refined using the zeolite cubic space group Fd-3m meanwhile
Z3–Z5 with a MFI zeolite structure with monoclinic P2 /n space
1
group. Z1 and Z2 presented a cell parameter of a = 24.4059(6) A˚
and a = 24.2728(11) A˚ respectively. The results indicate that the cell
parameter decreases with the Si/Al ratio increases. On the other
hand, differences in the cell parameters were not significant for MFI
as Al (WO ) . The shift of the band-gap observed in the UV–Vis
2 4 3
spectra (Fig. 3) could be related to the presence of these species.
According to the literature, the Pt 4f core-level region of metallic
platinum shows a peak at 70.9 eV. This peak overlaps with the very
intense peak of the Al 2 p appearing at ca. 74.0 eV [39]. Due to the
low concentration of Pt in the samples of ca. 0.03 wt.%, (significantly
lower than that of Al) it was not possible detect the presence of Pt
by means of the XPS analysis.
zeolites. For instance, the following cell parameters were obtained
for Z4: a = 19.9379(17) A˚ , b = 20.1940(21) A˚ , c = 13.4108(12) A˚ and
for Z5: a = 19.9236(9) A˚ , b = 20.1512(9) A˚ , c = 13.4041(6) A˚ . For Zeo-
lite Y the Si/Al ratio may influence the VOC adsorption ability of
the composites. Moreover, the difference in the amount of zeolites
between the raw materials and the composites should be con-
sidered in order to explain the lower adsorption ability of AHPs
materials.
Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the samples under study.
Diffractions from the MFI or FAU phases are observed in the XRD
patterns recorded for the APHs prepared with Z1–Z2, or Z3–Z5,
respectively. The crystalline structure of the microporous materi-
Fig. 5 shows representative micrographs of the WO –Pt samples
3
prepared by the photodeposition method (before their incor-
poration onto the zeolites). The images clearly show that the
photodeposition method used in this study results in the forma-
tion of Pt nanoparticles of ca. 5 nm (Fig. 5b and c) [8]. However, a
small fraction of larger Pt particles of ca. 15–20 nm are also observed
(Fig. 5a). The particles are well crystallized and the XEDS exper-
iments clearly confirm that these particles are with no doubt Pt
als is not affected by the incorporation of WO –Pt onto the zeolites.
3
The monoclinic WO3 phase, the most stable tungstate oxide phase
◦
at room temperature, exhibits three characteristic peaks at 23.3 ,
2
(see Fig. 1 Supporting information). The average size of the WO –Pt
3
◦
◦
3.8 and 24.6 assigned to the (0 0 2), (0 2 0) and (2 0 0) planes,
domains is of ca. 160 nm (Fig. 5d). These values are in good agree-
ment with previously reported results for similar systems [40].
respectively [34]. These reflections are observed in the diffrac-
tograms of the Zeolite/WO –Pt samples (JCPDS No. 43-1035) [35]. It
The Zeolite/WO –Pt samples where characterized by SEM
3
3
should be noted that in the diffractograms of the samples contain-
ing the FAU phase, the peak at 23.3 contains contributions from
microscopy in order to obtain information about the morphology of
◦
the different zeolites and of the WO –Pt distribution on the zeolites.
3
both the WO3 and FAU crystalline phases. On the other hand, the
diffraction lines of the MFI phase overlap with the main diffraction
Representative images of Z1/WO –Pt, Z3/WO –Pt and Z5/WO –Pt
are shown in Fig. 6. Differences in the morphology, shape of the
3
3
3
lines of the WO phase. Nevertheless, a carefully observation of the
zeolite substrate and in the dispersion of the WO –Pt particles can
3
3
diffractograms shows an increase in the intensity of the peak at
be observed. White and bright WO –Pt particles on zeolite aggre-
gates of different size, depending of the type of zeolite and its
Si/Al ratio were observed. Evident differences in the morphology
3
◦
◦
2
3.8 and 24.6 due to the presence of the WO monoclinic phase.
3
A slight decrease in the intensity of the diffraction lines character-
istic of the zeolites after addition of 8 wt.% of Pt loaded WO3 was
also observed. Diffraction lines characteristic of Pt fcc phases are
not observed in the diffractograms probably due to the very low
concentration of Pt in the final catalysts.
of the zeolites can be appreciated. For instance, Z1/WO –Pt hybrid
3
(Fig. 6a). In the case of ZSM-5 zeolite (Z5/WO –Pt) homogeneous
3
particles of ca. 1.0 m can be observed (Fig. 6c). On the contrary,