J. Fernández-Catalá et al.
Applied Catalysis A, General 564 (2018) 123–132
2
.2. Preparation of P25 (TiO
2
) encapsulated in silica with hierarchical
samples was carried out by treating them with HF at room temperature.
Thermogravimetric analysis was done in a thermobalance (SDT
porosity
2
960 instrument, TA). In these analyses, the sample was heated up at
−
1
Commercial TiO
2
(Evonik P25) was encapsulated in spherical silica
900 °C in air (heating rate of 5 °C min ).
with hierarchical porosity following a straightforward sol-gel synthesis
adapted from previous reports [39].
As an illustrative example, the synthesis of the P25/spherical hier-
2
archical silica done to obtain a nominal loading of 20 wt.% TiO was
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out in a SEIFERT 2002
equipment. Cu Kα (1.54 Å) radiation was used. The scanning velocity
was 2°/min, and diffraction patterns were recorded in the angular 2θ
range of 6–80 º.
performed as follows: 0.32 g of P25 were dispersed in 10.1 g of water
using an ultrasound probe (Bandelin SONOPULS HD 2200) with a
power of 660 W operating at 30% power for 5 min. In order to prepare
the composite material, the P25 dispersion in water was mixed with
The UV-VIS/DR spectroscopy analysis was performed in an UV–vis
spectrophotometer (Jasco V-670), with an integrating sphere accessory
and powder sample holder. BaSO was used as the standard reference
4
and the reflectance signal was calibrated with a Spectralon standard
(Labsphere SRS-99-010, 99% reflectance). The absorption edge wave-
length was estimated from the intercept at zero absorbance of the high
slope portion of each individual spectrum in the range 200–800 nm
(absorbance method). Then, the band gap can be calculated [40] as:
0.9 g of urea, 0.81 g of F-127 and 5.8 μl of glacial HAc. This solution
was stirred for 80 min. The solution was cooled at 0 °C and 4 g of TMOS
were added dropwise under vigorous stirring. The resulting solution
was kept under stirring for 40 min at 0 °C. The solution was rapidly
transferred to a 40 ml autoclave and heated at 40 °C for 20 h to promote
gel formation. The temperature was later increased to 120 °C with a
dwelling time of 6 h to promote the decomposition of urea to generate
the mesoporosity. The resulting encapsulated P25 was calcined at
1
239.8
λ
Eg =
where Eg is the band gap energy (eV) and λ is the edge wavelength
(
nm).
500 °C for 6 h with a heating rate of 1 °C/ min in order to remove the
Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were performed in an
templates and any leftover reagents used in the synthesis.
Autosorb-6B apparatus from Quantachrome [37]. Prior to analysis all
samples were degassed at 250 °C for 4 h. BET surface area (SBET) and
total micropore volume (VN2) were determined by applying the Bru-
nauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation, and the Dubinin–Raduskevich
In this work, the amount of P25 in the synthesis was changed to
obtain composites with a nominal TiO
0.16 g and 0.64 g, respectively). All samples were calcined as described
above. The nomenclature of these samples is P25_10/SiO , P25_20/SiO
and P25_40/SiO for the samples containing 10, 20, and 40 wt.% of
nominal P25 loading, respectively.
2
loading of 10 and 40 wt.%
(
2
2
2
equation to the N adsorption data obtained at −196 °C, respectively.
2
Total pore volumes were determined by nitrogen adsorption volume at
a relative pressure of 0.95. Mesopore size distributions for all the
samples were obtained applying the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH)
2
.3. Preparation of P25 (TiO
2
) in a precipitated silica (M001) and a
2
equation to the N desorption branch data from the adsorption iso-
mesoporous silica (MCM-41)
therms at −196 °C, using the software provided by Quantachrome [41].
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken using a
JEOL JEM-2010 equipment. Field-emission scanning electron micro-
scope (FE-SEM) images were taken using a ZEISS, Merlin VP Compact,
this equipment has incorporated a microanalysis system by Energy
Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), BRUKER Quantax 400 for per-
forming elemental mapping of Si and Ti species present in the samples.
For comparison purposes, two more composites of P25 encapsulated
20 wt.% nominal loading) with precipitated silica [37] and a meso-
porous silica (MCM-41 type) [38] were also prepared. We used the
same methodology as that employed to encapsulate the P25 in hier-
archical silica.
The synthesis of the P25 encapsulated in a precipitated silica was
performed as follows: 0.4 g of P25 were dispersed in 20 g of water with
an ultrasound probe (Bandelin SONOPULS HD 2200) with a power of
(
2.5. Catalytic tests
6
60 W output operating at 30% power for 5 min. In order to prepare the
composite material, the P25 dispersion in water was mixed with 4 ml of
NH OH, 85 g of EtOH to favour the precipitation of the silica, 70 g of
The photocatalytic performance of the different materials was stu-
died using an experimental system designed in our laboratory. The
system consists of a vertical quartz reactor where the photocatalyst bed
is placed on a quartz wool bed. The reactor is 50 mm in height, its
diameter is 20 mm and the quartz wool support height is around
10 mm. A UV lamp is placed parallel to the quartz reactor, at a distance
around 1 cm. The UV lamp radiation peak appears at 365 nm. The
commercial reference of this lamp is TL 8 W/05 FAM (Philips, 1 W).
Finally, the coupled quartz reactor lamp is surrounded by a cylinder
covered with aluminum foil. A scheme of this system is depicted else-
where [36].
4
water and 8 ml of TEOS, at 380 rpm for 1 h. The mixture was filtered
and dried overnight at 323 K. The resulting encapsulated P25 was cal-
cined at 500 °C for 6 h with a heating rate of 1 °C/ min in order to
remove the templates and any leftover reagents used in the synthesis.
This sample was named P25/M001.
The synthesis of the P25 encapsulated in mesoporous silica was
performed as follows: 0.4 g of P25 were dispersed in 20 g of water with
an ultrasound probe (Bandelin SONOPULS HD 2200) with a power of
660 W operating at 30% power for 5 min. The composite material was
prepared by dissolving 2 g of the templating agent (cetyl-
trimethylammonium bromide) in 76 g of deionized water. The mixture
was stirred and heated gently until a clear solution was obtained. This
mixture was added to the P25 dispersion in water, together with 4 ml of
The photocatalysts synthesised in this work were used for the oxi-
dation of propene at 100 ppmv in air at room temperature under flow
conditions. The calibrated gas cylinder was supplied by Carburos
Metálicos, S.A.
NH
4
OH and 8 ml of TEOS. The resulting mixture was stirred at 380 rpm
The flow rate of the propene-containing stream was 30 (STP) ml/
min after purging the reactor with helium.
for 1 h. The suspension was filtered and dried overnight at 323 K. The
resulting encapsulated P25 was calcined as described above. This
sample was labelled as P25/MCM-41.
The weight of photocatalyst used in these experiments was 0.11 g.
However, in order to study the illumination efficiency and any possible
inter-particle mass transfer issues, tests at different flow rates of pro-
pene were done in which the flow of propene and the mass of P25 were
both changed in order to keep the space velocity constant (Vsp = flow
(ml/min)/ mass of photocatalyst (g)) at a value of 257 ml/g·min. The
2.4. Samples characterization
The percentages of TiO
2
2
and SiO present in the samples were
−
1
−1
−1
analyzed by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP-
OES), in a Perkin-Elmer Optima 4300 system. Dissolution of the
ratio was 10 ml min /0.0367 g, 20 ml min /0.0735, 30 ml min
/
−
1
0.11 g and 40 ml min /0.147 g. This was done in order to properly
125