Paper
NJC
3 L. Guo, S. Chen, L. Li and Z. Wei, J. Power Sources, 2014, 247,
360–364.
4 D. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Peng, X. Wang, W. Hu, C. Jing, S. Tian
and J. Tian, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 177, 86–92.
5 H. Xu, K. Zhang, B. Yan, J. Zhong, S. Li and Y. Du, New
J. Chem., 2017, 41, 3048–3054.
6 Z. Qi, C. Xiao, C. Liu, T. W. Goh, L. Zhou, R. M. Ganesh,
Y. Pei, X. Li, L. A. Curtiss and W. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2017, 139, 4762–4768.
7 Z. Ji, G. Zhu, X. Shen, H. Zhou, C. Wu and M. Wang, New
J. Chem., 2012, 36, 1774–1780.
8 J. J. Pietron, M. B. Pomfret, C. N. Chervin, J. W. Long and
D. R. Rolison, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 5197–5204.
9 R. B. Moghaddam and P. G. Pickup, Electrochim. Acta, 2012,
65, 210–215.
10 A. T. E. Vilian, S. Chen and S. Piraman, New J. Chem., 2015,
39, 953–961.
contribute to a higher OHads species content, accelerating the
conversion of COads to CO2 on the Pt-based electrocatalyst in
the MOR.
The stabilities of the catalysts were assessed by chronoam-
perometric measurements at a potential of 0.6 V for 3600 s
(Fig. 5d). For all the electrocatalysts, a sharp drop in the current
density was observed in the initial period owing to the poison-
ing by the intermediate species. Then, the current decayed at a
much slower rate and reached a plateau. The Pt/His-CeO2-C
catalyst maintained the highest current over 3600 s, demon-
strating its longer operation time and better antipoisoning
properties. Therefore, the synergistic effects between Pt and
His-CeO2 facilitate the removal of intermediates.
4. Conclusions
In this study, histidine was chosen as a growth-directing agent to
regulate the physicochemical properties of CeO2 nanoparticles
synthesized under urea hydrolysis conditions. Histidine-mediated
CeO2 nanoparticles with an average size of 12.2 nm had a larger
proportion of Ce3+ species and an increased oxygen vacancy content
compared with bare CeO2. Pt/His-CeO2-C electrocatalysts were
prepared by using His-CeO2 nanoparticles as co-catalysts, contain-
ing Pt nanoparticles with a particle size of around 2.2 nm and a
proportion of Pt0 species of 67.9%. CV showed that Pt/His-CeO2-C
had a mass activity of up to 1116.9 A gÀ1 and an activity approxi-
mately 1.5-, 2.9- and 2.2-fold greater than Pt/CeO2-C, Pt/C-Z and
Pt/C-JM, respectively. The higher activity of Pt/His-CeO2-C in the
MOR was attributed to the following factors. (i) His-CeO2 has more
oxygen vacancies to provide sufficient OHads species on surface,
leading to the easy elimination of the COads adsorbed on the Pt
surface. (ii) The strong interactions between the Pt species and His-
CeO2 accelerate the elimination of intermediate poisons because
COads on the Pt surface tends to diffuse onto the Pt–CeO2 interface
and can be oxidized by OHads species. (iii) The addition of His-CeO2
improves the fraction of metallic Pt0 species and reduces the
particle size of Pt.
11 C. Odetola, L. N. Trevani and E. B. Easton, Appl. Catal., B,
2017, 210, 263–275.
12 H. Huang, J. Zhu, D. Li, C. Shen, M. Li, X. Zhang, Q. Jiang,
J. Zhang and Y. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 4560–4567.
13 Z. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Gu, L. Su and L. Chen, Energy Environ.
Sci., 2014, 7, 2535–2558.
14 D. M. Gu, Y. Y. Chu, Z. B. Wang, Z. Z. Jiang, G. P. Yin and
Y. Liu, Appl. Catal., B, 2011, 102, 9–18.
15 M. A. Scibioh, S. K. Kim, E. A. Cho, T. H. Lim, S. A. Hong and
H. Y. Ha, Appl. Catal., B, 2008, 84, 773–782.
16 Y. Gu, C. Liu, Y. Li, X. Sui, K. Wang and Z. Wang, J. Power
Sources, 2014, 265, 335–344.
17 C. Sun and L. Chen, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2009, 3883–3887.
18 Y. L. Zheng, D. S. Mao, S. S. Sun and G. Y. Fu, J. Mater. Sci.,
2016, 51, 917–925.
19 S. H. Kim, T. Y. Olson, J. H. Satcher Jr and Y. J. Han,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 151, 64–69.
20 Y. Tao, N. Cao, J. Pan, Y. Sun, C. Jin and Y. Song, J. Mater.
Sci., 2014, 49, 897–904.
21 R. A. Soomro, K. R. Hallam, Z. H. Ibupoto, A. Tahira,
S. T. H. Sherazi, X. Sirajjuddin, S. S. Memon and
M. Willander, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 190, 972–979.
22 G. Zhang, Z. Shen, M. Liu, C. Guo, P. Sun, Z. Yuan, B. Li,
D. Ding and T. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 25782–25790.
23 S. B. Atla, M. N. Wu, W. Pan, Y. T. Hsiao, A. C. Sun,
M. J. Tseng, Y. J. Chen and C. Y. Chen, Mater. Charact.,
2014, 98, 202–208.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgements
24 H. Yuan, D. Guo, X. Li, L. Yuan, W. Zhu, L. Chen and X. Qiu,
Fuel Cells, 2009, 9, 121–127.
25 T. Li, G. Xiang, J. Zhuang and X. Wang, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 6060–6062.
This work was supported by the NSFC (21576205, 21621004)
and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative
Research Team in University (IRT_15R46).
26 C. Fang, D. Zhang, L. Shi, R. Gao, H. Li, L. Ye and J. Zhang,
Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 803–811.
27 M. E. Khan, M. M. Khan and M. H. Cho, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7,
5928–5944.
28 S. Mansingh, D. K. Padhi and K. M. Parida, Catal. Sci.
Technol., 2017, 7, 2772–2781.
29 R. Verma, S. K. Samdarshi, S. Bojja, S. Paul and B. Choundhury,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2015, 141, 414–422.
References
1 C. Koenigsmann and S. S. Wong, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011,
4, 1161–1176.
2 J. Rossmeisl, P. Ferrin, G. A. Tritsaris, A. U. Nilekar, S. Koh,
S. E. Bae, S. R. Brankovic, P. Strasser and M. Mavrikakis,
Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8335–8342.
18164 | New J. Chem., 2018, 42, 18159--18165 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2018