Communication
ChemComm
Table 2 Rates of acetaldehyde formation over Pd1Cu5–Y and after cycles, the loss of activity (ca. 10%) is reversible and can be
regeneration in the initial period (after 15 min) and after 4 h under Wacker
mainly, if not totally, attributed to the formation of carbon
deposits and zero-valent palladium. This regeneration proce-
ꢀ1
conditions (378 K, 0.86 kgcat s mol
)
Initial reaction rate
mmol AcH mmol
Reaction rate after 4 h dure could possibly still be optimized further by employing
ꢀ1
(
(mmol AcH mmol
periodic regeneration steps before the catalyst is maximally
deactivated to take advantage of the high initial activity of the
catalyst during the first 1 or 2 hours of the reaction before
reaching steady-state conditions.
ꢀ
1
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
Catalyst
Pd min
)
Pd min
)
Pd1Cu5–Y
Regeneration in O
30.8
, 623 K
24.8
16.5
15.4
10.2
2
1
2
3
st cycle
nd cycle
rd cycle
6.6
5.8
5.3
In summary, we show that optimum Wacker activity is
achieved by exchanging low loadings of palladium with excess
copper while high palladium loading was observed to induce
more palladium sintering. In addition, accumulation of carbon
deposits and formation of inactive Pd(0) were observed leading
to the deactivation of the catalyst under steady-state Wacker
conditions. The initial regeneration in oxygen at 623 K only
resulted in a partial recovery of initial activity but became
reversible in subsequent reactivation cycles. These results
suggest that although deactivation of Pd–Cu/zeolite Y catalyst
was not prevented, the heterogeneous process was optimized
by diminishing the activity loss by utilizing less palladium and
could be optimized further by including periodic regeneration
steps, improving the stability.
at a higher temperature (623 K) than what was used in the
standard activation and reaction conditions (378 K) because
calcination of the spent catalyst at lower temperatures did not
burn off all the carbon deposits. However, only 75% of the
initial activity of Pd1Cu5–Y was regenerated by the reactivation
procedure. Again, a fast and a slow deactivation of the catalyst
were observed through time (Fig. 4, 1st cycle), albeit with a
lower steady-state rate of acetaldehyde formation after 4 hours
under Wacker conditions (Table 2). At temperatures higher than
5
73 K, the majority, if not all, of ammine ligands that were initially
14
present are released from their coordination with Pd(II). Fig. S2
We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (159555)
for the financial support and the SuperXAS beamline at the
Swiss Light Source for the allocation of beamtime.
ꢀ
1
(
ESI†) depicts the disappearance of the bands at 1310 and 1450 cm
in the IR-ATR spectrum of regenerated Pd1Cu5–Y, which is indicative
9
of the loss of Pd–ammine coordination and the subsequent release
1
4
and oxidation of ammonia at 623 K.
These lead to irreversible changes in the original catalyst as Conflicts of interest
observed in the Pd and Cu K-edge EXAFS spectra of Pd1Cu5–Y
after the 1st reactivation (Fig. S7, ESI†). EXAFS analyses (Table S3,
There are no conflicts to declare.
ESI†) reveal the recovery of the initial intensity of Pd–O (2.02 Å)
and Cu–O (1.95 Å) scattering peaks; the disappearance of metallic
Notes and references
Pd–Pd (2.75 Å) scattering peak; and the emergence of Cu–(O)–Cu
2.91 Å) and two weak Pd–(O)–Pd coordination shells at 3.04 and
.43 Å. These results signify that the reactivation procedure resulted
1 J. Smidt, W. Hafner, R. Jira, J. Sedlmeier, R. Sieber, R. R u¨ ttinger and
H. Kojer, Angew. Chem., 1959, 71, 176–182.
(
3
2
3
R. Jira, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9034–9037.
Acetaldehyde: A Global Strategic Business Report, 2016, Global
Industry Analysts, Inc., San Jose, California.
in the reoxidation of Pd(0) and Cu(I) with the corresponding
formation of palladium(II) oxide and copper(II) oxide particles.
After 4 hours under Wacker conditions, the intensity of Pd–O
and Cu–O scattering peaks decreased; the Pd–Pd (metallic)
coordination shell reappeared at 2.75 Å; and the intensity of
two Pd–(O)–Pd scattering peaks increased, which are indica-
tive of the reduction of Pd(II) and Cu(II) and the formation of
more palladium(II) oxide aggregates. Thus, we posit that the
irrecoverable loss of initial activity in the 1st cycle of reactiva-
tion is associated largely with the release of ammine ligands
from palladium coordination and the corresponding irreversible
formation of inactive palladium and copper(II) oxide nanoparticles.
4
M. Eckert, G. Fleischmann, R. Jira, H. M. Bolt and K. Golka,
Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag,
Weinheim, Germany, 2000, 1, 191–207.
5 A. W. Stobbe-Kreemers, M. Makkee and J. J. F. Scholten, Appl. Catal.,
A, 1997, 156, 219–238.
6
R. Barthos, G. Novod ´a rszki and J. Valyon, React. Kinet., Mech. Catal.,
016, 121, 17–29.
7 K. Nowi n´ ska, D. Dudko and R. Golon, Chem. Commun., 1996,
77–279.
P. H. Espeel, M. C. Tielen and P. Jacobs, Chem. Commun., 1991,
69–671.
9 P. H. Espeel, G. De Peuter, M. C. Tielen and P. Jacobs, J. Phys. Chem.,
994, 98, 11588–11596.
0 H. Arai, T. Yamashiro, T. Kubo and H. Tominaga, J. Jpn. Pet. Inst.,
976, 18, 39–44.
The reactivation procedure was done for a second time 11 O. Bander et al., US Pat., 3154586, 1964; L. Hornig, et al., US Pat.,
149167, 1964; W. Riemenschneider, et al., US Pat., 3301905, 1967.
2
2
8
6
1
1
1
3
(Fig. 4, 2nd cycle) resulting in a nearly similar steady-state rate
1
2 H. J. Hagemeyer and U. b. Staff, Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of
of acetaldehyde formation but only 67% of the initial activity
Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014, pp. 1–16.
was recovered relative to what was measured in the first cycle 13 L. S. Kau, E. I. Solomon and K. O. Hodgson, J. Phys. Colloques, 1986,
7, C8-289–C8-292; L. S. Kau, D. J. Spira-Solomon, J. E. Penner-
Hahn, K. Hodgson and E. I. Solomon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109,
433–6442.
observed in the second cycle. In the 2nd and 3rd reactivation 14 S. T. Homeyer and W. M. H. Sachtler, J. Catal., 1989, 117, 91–101.
4
(Table 2). The third cycle of reactivation led to nearly full
regeneration of Wacker activity in comparison with what was
6
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019