390
A. Goguet et al. / Journal of Catalysis 226 (2004) 382–392
reduced ceria [33,34]. Therefore, when platinum is added
to the ceria, a larger fraction of the support would be in a
reduced state as compared to the pure ceria, leading to in-
creased carbon deposition. Another possible explanation is
that the Pt increases the CO disproportionation rate and that
the carbon is easily transferred from the metal to the support.
Either or both of these effects are likely to be responsible
for the increased amount of carbon deposition on the 2%
Pt/CeO2 compared to the unpromoted ceria.
was clearly demonstrated that the rate of deposition was slow
under our standard conditions which would explain the slow
deactivation rate that was observed for the 2% Pt/CeO2 un-
der these normal reaction conditions. Furthermore, the fact
that the TPO peak attributed to the oxidation of carbona-
ceous species deposited under RWGS reaction conditions is
◦
located in a similar temperature range (260–290 C) as the
peak due to the oxidation of the carbon deposited during the
accelerated ageing in CO suggests that the two carbon de-
posits are of a similar type.
In the present study of the RWGS reaction, carbon depo-
sition could be solely responsible for the deactivation. No
metal sintering seemed to occur for our Pt/ceria catalyst.
This absence of sintering was evidenced by the fact that a
total recovery of the initial activity was obtained after re-
oxidation of the catalyst exposed to CO (see Table 3). Note
that the total recovery of the activity was only obtained when
the reoxidation was performed under “soft” conditions, that
is, 1% O2/Ar with a slow increase of the temperature from
Another interesting piece of information could be ex-
tracted from the quantification of the amount of carbon de-
posited on the catalyst. As a matter of fact, after an exposure
to 10% of CO for 126 min, the amount of carbon deposited
−5
on the catalyst was 2.1 × 10 mol, which led to 78% deac-
tivation of the catalyst (see Fig. 6). Assuming that the carbon
atomic radius was 77 pm and that the carbon was deposited
as a monolayer, this amount of carbon deposit would only
cover 6.5% of the total surface of the CeO2 support (the BET
◦
room temperature to 400 C.
2
−1
When the reoxidation was performed under “hard” con-
surface area of the 2% Pt/CeO2 was 180 m g ). Therefore,
a coverage of only 6.5% of the total surface area of the sup-
port led to almost 80% of deactivation of the catalyst. This
result indicates that the fraction of the support involved in
the mechanism of the RWGS reaction is very small.
◦
ditions with admission of 20% O2/Ar directly at 400 C, the
recovery of the activity was only partial (see Table 2). This
result indicates that the conditions under which the reoxi-
dation was performed were crucial for the recovery of the
activity of our Pt/ceria catalyst. It is proposed that, when the
Moreover, although the critical size of the platinum par-
ticles involved in the RWGS reaction mechanism is not
clear [23], the average radius of the platinum particles in
our sample was calculated from the platinum dispersion (i.e.,
17%), and found to be ca. 3.0 nm. From this average radius
and assuming that the carbon was depositing around the plat-
inum particles, it is possible to calculate the radius of the
“ring” of carbon deposit surrounding each metal particle (see
Fig. 10, R1 for Pt particle radius, R2 for radius of the carbon
ring; the Pt particles were considered to be hemispherical).
The calculation gave a value of R2 equal to 12 nm, which
corresponds to only 4 times the radius of the platinum parti-
cle (note that in the hypothesis of particles equally spaced on
the surface of the support, the distance between 2 particles
would be ∼150 nm). This result would mean that the “active
part” of the support would correspond only to the part that is
very close to the platinum particles.
This hypothesis would therefore explain why the activity
of the unpromoted ceria is so low for the RWGS reaction.
As was noted before, TPR results showed that the addition
of a noble metal to the ceria led to an easier reduction of the
latter. This effect was explained by the fact that the oxygen
was diffusing from the support to the metallic surface, eas-
ing the reaction with the reductant (H2 or CO) adsorbed on
the metallic surface. It is therefore possible to envisage that
the portion of the support close to the metal particle could
be in a highly reduced state (a gradient is created between
the vicinity of the metal particles and rest of the surface of
the support) and would correspond to the active part of the
support (e.g., reactive toward the reduction of CO2).
◦
reoxidation was performed under hard conditions at 400 C,
the instantaneous oxidation of the adsorbed CO and car-
bon deposits induced a strong local temperature increase
that probably led to sintering of the platinum and therefore
to irreversible deactivation. When the reoxidation was per-
formed under soft conditions, the oxidation of the adsorbed
CO and the carbon deposits took place at a lower temper-
ature and the sintering did not take place. The fact that a
total recovery of the activity was obtained under our reoxida-
tion conditions and that many studies stressed that exposing
supported platinum to oxidizing conditions leads to sinter-
ing and not to redispersion [35,36] seems to indicate that the
activity recovery of our Pt/ceria was due to removal of car-
bon deposits from the surface and not to redispersion of a
sintered metallic phase.
Concerning the deactivation by overreduction proposed
by Zalc and co-workers [5], the result of the artificial ageing
under H2 (see Table 2) seems to indicate that this phenom-
enon is not taking place under our conditions. Nevertheless,
our ageing experiments were performed on a short time
scale (1 h) and it is possible that the conditions used were
not severe enough to fully create overreduction. Therefore,
overreduction cannot be completely discarded and a more
extensive study is necessary to fully address this question.
The role of carbon deposition in the deactivation of the
catalyst was further supported by the TPO experiments fol-
lowing exposure of the catalyst to our “standard” RWGS
reaction conditions. These results clearly showed that car-
bon deposition was indeed taking place under our normal
RWGS reaction conditions, as it did to a larger extent during
the harsher accelerated ageing conditions reported above. It
In this hypothesis, the slope change observed on Fig. 6
(plot of the percentage of deactivation against the amount