8
40
GERASIMENKO et al.
Table 1. Crystallographic data and details of the experiment
EXPERIMENTAL
and refinement of the SnZrF structure
6
Synthesis of I. Zirconium tetrafluoride and tin di-
fluoride were used as initial reagents. Zirconium tet-
rafluoride was prepared by the decomposition of
ammonium fluorozirconate at 650°C followed by
removal of oxygen-containing admixtures by sublima-
tion in a closed platinum apparatus at 950°C. High-
purity tin difluoride was obtained following a described
procedure [2]. The crystals were synthesized by slow
crystallization from a melted mixture of SnF and ZrF
Parameter
Value
323.91
M
Temperature of recording
295(2) K
P2/n
Space group
a, Å
6.6119(5)
5.2503(5)
6.9929(6)
114.239(4)
221.35(3)
2
2
4
b, Å
taken at a molar ratio of 2 : 1. For this purpose, 25 g of
a mixture of the corresponding salts was heated in a
closed glassy-carbon crucible to 450°C for 15 min until
the components were completely dissolved and then
cooled for 3 h to room temperature. All procedures
were carried out in a box dried with P O . Compound I
c, Å
β, deg
V, Å
2
5
Z
is formed as a porous layer of colorless transparent
needlelike crystals in the middle part of the ingot.
ρ(calcd), g/cm3
4.860
µ, mm–1
X-ray diffraction analysis. A set of reflection
8.031
intensities was obtained on a SMART-1000 CCD dif-
F(000)
288
fractometer at room temperature (MoK radiation,
α
graphite monochromator). Data were collected for two
Shape (size, mm) of crystal
Prism
0.02 × 0.08 × 0.35)
positions of the detector (33° and 80° in sets of 906,
(
6
60, and 345 frames at ϕ = 0°, 90°, and 180°, respec-
Region of data collection by
θ, deg
3.57–51.23
tively; ω scan mode at a step of 0.2° and exposure time
of 10 s per frame). The crystal–detector distance was
45 mm. X-ray absorption in the sample was corrected
for using the SADABS program [3].
Intervals of reflection indices –14 ≤ h ≤ 14, –11 ≤ k ≤ 6,
–
14 ≤ l ≤ 15
The structure was solved by the direct method and
refined in the anisotropic approximation.
The main crystallographic data and details of the
experiment and refinement of structure I are presented
in Table 1. The coordinates of atoms and their isotropic
equivalent thermal parameters are presented in Table 2.
Measured reflections
Independent reflections
Reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement method
4591
2097(Rint = 0.0457)
1648
Full-matrix least-squares
2
method for F
The data were collected and edited and the unit cell
parameters were refined using the SMART and SAINT
Plus program packages [3]. All calculations for deter-
mination and refinement of the structure were per-
formed using the SHTLXTL/PC program packages [4].
Refinement parameters
39
GOOF
0.953
2
R factors for F > 2σ(F )
R = 0.0379, wR = 0.0945
2
1
2
R factors for all reflections
R = 0.0462, wR = 0.0979
1
2
Molar absorption coefficient
0.053(2)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Residual electron density
–2.835/2.829
(near Sn atom)
The crystal structure I is formed from the
3
(min/max), e/Å
(
SnZrF6)∞∞ layers parallel to the (010) plane (Fig. 1).
The layers are formed from slightly bent chains which
extend along the [101] direction and are formed from
Table 2. Coordinates of atoms and their isotropic thermal
2
+
parameters for SnZrF6
the edge-sharing eight-vertex Zr polyhedra and Sn
cations.
2
Atom
Sn
x
y
z
U , Å
eq
The Zr and Sn atoms lie in the two fold axes. The
coordination zirconium polyhedron is a distorted two-
0.75
0.75
0.03100(3) 0.25
0.48265(3) 0.75
0.01165(2) capped trigonal prism [5]. The Zr–F(1) and Zr–F(3)
distances to the terminal fluorine atoms are 2.039(1)
Zr
0.00613(3)
and 2.081(1) Å, respectively (Table 3). The bridging
h
F(2) and F(2) atoms linking the polyhedra into the
chain are remoted from the Zr atom at 2.116(1) and
2.269(1) Å, respectively. The average Zr–F bond length
in structure I is equal to 2.126 Å, and the FZrF angles
vary from 64.94° to 119.78°. The angle directed to the
F(1)
F(2)
F(3)
0.6795(1) 0.2050(2)
0.9184(1) 0.6849(2)
0.5101(1) 0.6842(2)
0.9173(1) 0.0141(2)
1.0332(1) 0.0131(2)
0.8082(1) 0.0172(2)
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF COORDINATION CHEMISTRY Vol. 28 No. 12 2002