steric effects have been shown to be important in controlling
deprotonation in the Arabidopsis thaliana cycloartenol syn-
thase (which also cyclizes to the protosteryl cation but
abstracts a different proton). The cycloartenol synthase
Ile481Val mutant converts oxidosqualene to a mixture of
cycloartenol, lanosterol, and parkeol (54:25:21).8 Ile481 is
strictly conserved in the known examples of cycloartenol
synthase,9 and valine is conserved at the corresponding
position in lanosterol synthase enzymes.1a These residues
correspond to active-site residue Asp374 in Alicyclobacillus
acidocaldarius squalene-hopene cyclase, and wild-type cy-
cloartenol synthase probably differs from the Ile481Val
mutant by active-site alterations rather than changes in global
architecture. We describe here a series of experiments in
which Saccharomyces cereVisiae10 lanosterol synthase Val454
(which corresponds to A. thaliana cycloartenol synthase
Ile481) was mutated to the hydrophobic residues phenyl-
alanine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, and glycine to investi-
gate the role of sterics in catalysis.
mg/mL) were added to the resultant homogenates, which
were incubated at room temperature overnight. Triterpenes
were recovered from the reactions essentially as described
previously.14 Reactions were typically performed to provide
∼50 mg of total triterpene alcohol products.
The activities of the mutant enzymes were initially
analyzed by TLC (1:1 hexane:ether). This qualitative method
is useful for assaying total activity of an oxidosqualene
cyclase because diverse triterpene alcohols including lano-
sterol, cycloartenol, parkeol, lupeol, and â-amyrin have
sufficient structural similarity near the polar alcohol that they
are inseparable by TLC. The Val454Leu, Val454Ile,
Val454Ala, and Val454Gly mutants cyclized oxidosqualene
to material that comigrated with lanosterol. The Val454Ala
and Val454Gly mutants also produced a minor product less
polar than lanosterol. The Val454Phe mutant did not produce
detectable product (<1% the activity of wild-type, if any).
The products of the leucine and isoleucine mutants were
characterized further after acetylation with acetic anhydride
and pyridine. GC analysis of each reaction showed a single
signal that coeluted with lanosteryl acetate; no parkeyl acetate
or cycloartenyl acetate was observed (<0.5%, if any); 250
MHz 1H NMR analysis confirmed that each mutant produced
lanosterol. The acetylated triterpene produced by the iso-
leucine mutant showed methyl and acetate protons within
0.03 ppm of literature lanosteryl acetate signals:15 δ 0.688
(C18), 0.872 (C30), 0.884 (C28), 0.884 (C29), 0.912 (C21),
1.004 (C19), and 4.49 ppm (C3). The acetylated product of
the leucine mutant showed the same lanosteryl acetate
protons: δ 0.687 (C18), 0.871 (C30), 0.881 (C29), 0.881
(C28), 0.911 (C21), 1.003 (C19), and 4.50 ppm (C3).
The Val454Ala mutant was expressed and assayed simi-
larly. GC analysis of an acetylated aliquot showed two
compounds in a 91:9 ratio. The crude triterpene alcohols were
purified by silica gel chromatography (5% ether in hexane)
followed by HPLC (YMC-Pack-SIL, 15% tert-butyl methyl
ether:85% hexane). The 250 MHz 1H NMR spectrum of the
major compound matched that of literature lanosterol val-
ues,15 and that of the minor compound was consistent with
literature values for achilleol A.16
pSM61.21 (native S. cereVisiae lanosterol synthase in the
integrative galactose-inducible yeast expression vector
pRS305GAL)11 was subjected to single-stranded mutagen-
esis.12 The resultant lanosterol synthase Val454 derivatives
were used to transform the yeast lanosterol synthase mutant
SMY8.11 The strain expressing Val454Phe remained sterol-
dependent, but all other mutants produced colonies on sterol-
free media (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% galactose, 13
mg/L heme) that were indistinguishable from a control
expressing native lanosterol synthase in the same vector.
These genetic complementation experiments suggest that
when under galactose control Val454Leu, Val454Ile,
Val454Ala, and Val454Gly produce enough lanosterol to
meet the cell’s sterol requirements. If these mutants generate
byproducts, they are not sufficiently detrimental or abundant
to significantly inhibit yeast growth.
In vitro incubations with synthetic substrate generated
triterpene products for chromatographic and spectroscopic
analysis. Recombinant yeast was resuspended in 100 mM
potassium phosphate at pH 6.2 and lysed in a French Press.
Racemic oxidosqualene13 (1 mg/mL) and Triton X-100 (10
A control TLC assay suggested that this 91:9 quantitation
was inaccurate, because achilleol A (but not lanosterol) was
present in the homogenate before addition of substrate. The
yeast lanosterol synthase mutant SMY8 has a functional
biosynthetic pathway to oxidosqualene, which is converted
to lanosterol and achilleol A in vivo when the Val454Ala
mutant lanosterol synthase is expressed. Lanosterol is ap-
parently metabolized rapidly in vivo, but achilleol A is not.
Accumulated achilleol A produced in vivo would bias the
analysis to overestimate its production by the enzyme.
The Val454Ala and Val454Gly mutants were consequently
expressed in yeast strain LHY3,8 a lanosterol synthase mutant
(6) (a) Wendt, K. U.; Poralla, K.; Schulz, G. E. Science 1997, 277, 1811-
1815. (b) Wendt, K. U.; Lenhart, A.; Schulz, G. E. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 286,
175-187.
(7) (a) Merkofer, T.; Pale-Grosdemange, C.; Wendt, K. U.; Rohmer, M.;
Poralla, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2121-2124. (b) Pale-Grosdemange,
C.; Merkofer, T.; Rohmer, M.; Poralla, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
6009-6012. (c) Hoshino, T.; Sato, T. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2005-2006.
(8) Hart, E. A.; Hua, L.; Darr, L. A.; Wilson, W. K.; Pang, J.; Matsuda,
S. P. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9887-9888.
(9) (a) Corey, E. J.; Matsuda, S. P. T.; Bartel, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1993, 90, 11628-11632. (b) Morita, M.; Shibuya, M.; Lee, M.-S.;
Sankawa, U.; Ebizuka, Y. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1997, 20, 770-775. (c)
Kushiro, T.; Shibuya, M.; Ebizuka, Y. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 256, 238-
244. (d) Darr, L. B.; Godzina, S. M.; Matsuda, S. P. T. Plant Physiol. 1999,
121, 686. (e) Godzina, S. M.; Lovato, M. A.; Meyer, M. M.; Foster, K. A.;
Wilson, W. K.; Gu, W.; de Hostos, E. L.; Matsuda, S. P. T. Lipids 2000,
in press.
(10) Corey, E. J.; Matsuda, S. P. T.; Bartel, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1994, 91, 2211-2215.
(11) Corey, E. J.; Matsuda, S. P. T.; Baker, C. H.; Ting, A. Y.; Cheng,
H. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 219, 327-331.
(12) Ausubel, F. M.; Brent, R.; Kingston, R. E.; Moore, D. D.; Seidman,
J. G.; Smith, J. A.; Struhl, K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology;
Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1999.
(13) Nadeau, R. G.; Hanzlik, R. P. Methods Enzymol. 1968, 15, 346-
351.
(14) Herrera, J. B. R.; Bartel, B.; Wilson, W. K.; Matsuda, S. P. T.
Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 1905-1911.
(15) Emmons, G. T.; Wilson, W. K.; Schroepfer, G. J., Jr. Magn. Res.
Chem. 1989, 27, 1012-1024.
(16) Barrero, A. F.; Alvarez-Manzaneda R.; E. J.; Alvarez-Manzaneda
R.; R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3351-3352.
340
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 3, 2000