3
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have successfully established construction
of the characteristic lactone bridge of strongylophorine–2 for the
first time,7 which is suggested to be important for the inhibitory
activity for HIF–1 transcriptional pathway.6 The synthesis of the
key segment 3 was achieved in 5.4% yield over 18 steps starting
from dehydroepiandrosterone acetate (8) by developing improved
References and notes
1.
2.
3.
Blancher, C.; Harris, A. L. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1998, 17, 187-
194; Ratcliffe, P. J.; O'Rourke, J. F.; Maxwell, P. H.; Pugh, C. W.
J. Exp. Biol. 1998, 201, 1153-1162.
Hodges, T. W.; Hossain, C. F.; Kim, Y.-P.; Zhou, Y.-D.; Nagle,
D. G. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 767-771; Powis, G.; Kirkpatrick, L.
Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 647-654.
Braekman, J. C.; Daloze, D.; Hulot, G.; Tursch, B.; Declercq, J.
P.; Germain, G.; Van Meerssche, M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1978,
87, 917-926.
Salva, J.; Faulkner, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1941-3.
Mohammed, K. A.; Jadulco, R. C.; Bugni, T. S.; Harper, M. K.;
Sturdy, M.; Ireland, C. M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1402-1405.
Warabi, K.; Patrick, B. O.; Austin, P.; Roskelley, C. D.; Roberge,
M.; Andersen, R. J. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 736-740.
During preparation of this manuscript, a synthesis of 1 has been
reported by Yu et al, see; Yu, W.; Hjerrild, P.; Overgaard, J.;
Poulsen, T. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, published online.
Sucrow, W.; Howard, S. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 4341-4346.
Akhtar, M.; Barton, D. H. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 1528-
1536.
Table 1. Comparison of the 13C NMR spectroscopic data for natural 13,4
and synthetic 3.
4.
5.
position
1
2
3
4
5
δc (natural, ppm)a
38
22.6
40.3
43.2
50
δc (3, ppm)b
38.4
23.5
40.1
43.5
Δδ (ppm)
-0.4
-0.9
0.2
-0.3
0.7
6.
7.
49.3
8.
9.
10
24
25
26
36.5
73.4
23.5
176
35.9
74.3
23.6
176.1
0.6
-0.9
-0.1
-0.1
10. Costa, S. C. P.; Moreno, M. J. S. M.; Sáe Melo, M. L.; Campos
Neves, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8711-8714.
11. Kalvoda, J.; Heusler, K.; Ueberwasser, H.; Anner, G.; Wettstein,
A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1963, 46, 1361-1369; Terasawa, T.; Okada,
T. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 537-45.
a) Extracted from Faulkner paper (pyridine–d5).4
b) Collected in pyridine–d5 at 100 MHz.
12. Coustal, S.; Fagart, J.; Davioud, E.; Marquet, A. Tetrahedron
1995, 51, 3559-3570.
13. Numazawa, M.; Kamiyama, T.; Tachibana, M.; Oshibe, M. J.
Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2245-2252.
oxidative C–H functionalization at the C24 methyl group,
followed by stereoselective construction of the C4 quaternary
carbon stereogenic center in a stepwise manner. Current efforts
14. Stastna, E.; Rath, N. P.; Covey, D. F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9,
4685-4694.
15. The hydroboration is highly α–selective. In a related example,16
the hydroboration of exo-methylene at C4 has been reported to
selectively take place from the α–side. Our observation is
consistent with the report and the selectivity can be attributed to
the presence of the sterically demanding axial MOMOCH2– group
at C10. See reference 16.
are
now
focused
on
the
synthesis
of
(8–
desmethyl)strongylophorine–2 (2), which would be achieved in
an additional 7–9 steps from 3 and the inhibitory activity is of
particular interest in terms of the structure–activity relationships
to develop more efficient inhibitor, and the results will be
reported in due course.20
16. Alvarez-Manzaneda, E.; Chahboun, R.; Alvarez, E.; Ramos, J. M.;
Guardia, J. J.; Messouri, I.; Chayboun, I.; Mansour, A. I.;
Dahdouh, A. Synthesis 2010, 2010, 3493-3503.
17. Thompson, T. N.; Sierra, M. G.; McChesney, J. D. J. Org. Chem.
1985, 50, 4447-4450; Ling, T.; Chowdhury, C.; Kramer, B. A.;
Vong, B. G.; Palladino, M. A.; Theodorakis, E. A. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 8843-8853; Toyota, M.; Asano, T.; Ihara, M. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 3929-3932.
18. Frigerio, M.; Santagostino, M.; Sputore, S.; Palmisano, G. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 7272-7276; Gobbini, M.; Armaroli, S.; Banfi, L.;
Benicchio, A.; Carzana, G.; Ferrari, P.; Giacalone, G.; Marazzi,
G.; Moro, B.; Micheletti, R.; Sputore, S.; Torri, M.; Zappavigna,
M. P.; Cerri, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 4275-4299.
19. Kraus, G. A.; Taschner, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1175-1176;
Bal, B. S.; Childers Jr, W. E.; Pinnick, H. W. Tetrahedron 1981,
37, 2091-2096; Ziegler, F. E.; Wallace, O. B. J. Org. Chem. 1995,
60, 3626-3636.
Acknowledgments
Financial support (a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
(25350967)) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports,
Culture and Technology, Japan, is gratefully acknowledged. We
also thank Ms. Mikiko Kiuchi (Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K.)
for collecting HRMS data of all new compounds. Thanks are also
due to one of the reviewers for suggestion of stereochemical
control in the reactions at C4.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, 1H and 13C
NMR spectra, and NOESY analysis of 17) associated with this
article can be found, in the online version, at
20. Our future work will also focus on methylation of 3 at C8 position
by C–H functionalization technology toward synthesis of 1.