8
52
Vol. 59, No. 7
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
water, and next a solution of 2 mmol AgNO in 20 ml pure water was added.
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢁCH (CH ) OCH COO ] ꢂ676 (100%). H-NMR (D O,
3 2 3 2 2
3
After stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere in the dark for 12 h at 40 °C, the
deposit was filtered off. Filtrate was blended with 2 mmol CF SO Na and
ppm) d: 0.84—2.73 (m, 17H, 10H of DACH and 7H of CH CH CH ),
3 2 2
3.34—3.49 (m, 4H of CH OCH COO), 3.80—4.04 (m, 2H, C H –CH ),
3
3
2
2
6
4
2
stirred at 60 °C for 24 h. The solution was concentrated and cooled to 0 °C.
White solid was collected, washed with a small amount of chilled water and
ethanol, and then dried at 60 °C in vacuum. Yield 21%, Found (Calcd for
6.48—7.07 (m, 4H, C H ).
Compound B8 Yield 36%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 41.52
(41.83), H 5.66 (5.50), N 5.06 (5.14), Pt 35.68 (35.79). IR (KBr, cm ):
6 4
1
9
30
2
4
ꢀ
1
C H F N O SPt), C 29.61 (29.83), H 3.53 (3.37), N 5.10 (4.97), Pt 34.81 3437—3111 (m, nN–H), 2936, 2862 (m, n ), 1597 (s, nCꢂO), 751 (m, gArH).
1
4
19
3
2
4
C–H
ꢀ
1
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
(
(
34.64). IR (KBr, cm ): 3433—3107 (m, nN–H), 2936, 2864 (m, nC–H), 1566
ESI-MS m/z: [Mꢁ(CH ) COCH COO ] ꢂ676 (100%). H-NMR (D O,
3
3
2
2
ꢀ
1
m, nAr), 758 (m, gArH). ESI-MS m/z: [MꢀH] ꢂ62 (50%). H-NMR (D O, ppm) d: 0.92—2.72 (m, 19H, 10H of DACH and 9H of 3CH )), 3.35—3.74
2
3
ppm) d: 1.13—2.64 (m, 10H of DACH), 3.87—4.23 (m, 2H, C H –CH ), (m, 2H of COCH COO), 3.80—4.09 (m, 2H, C H –CH ), 6.25—7.02 (m,
6
4
2
2
6
4
2
6
.66—7.15 (m, 4H, C H ).
4H, C H ).
6
4
6 4
The procedures for preparing compounds B2—B8 were similar to B1.
Compound B2 Yield 27%, Found (Calcd for C H ClN O Pt), C 35.20 zolium bromide (MTT) assay was carried out as described by Mosmann.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-
22)
1
5
21
2
3
ꢀ
1
(
3
35.46), H 4.27 (4.14), N 5.39 (5.52), Pt 38.29 (38.43). IR (KBr, cm ): Tumor cells were plated onto 96-well sterile plates in 100 ml of medium at a
3
3
427—3104 (m, nN–H)ꢀ, 2937, 2861 (m, nC–H), 1596 (s, nCꢂO), 755 (m, gArH). density of 4ꢃ10 —8ꢃ10 cells per well and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a
1
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢀH] ꢂ507 (100%). H-NMR (D O, ppm) d: 1.12—2.60 5% CO containing incubator. Compounds B1—B8, oxaliplatin and carbo-
2
2
(
m, 10H of DACH), 3.84—3.97 (m, 2H, ClCH COO), 4.18—4.28 (m, 2H,
C H –CH ), 6.63—7.14 (m, 4H, C H ).
Compound B3 Yield 19%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 37.90
platin were added in final concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 mM. After
2
48 h, 50 ml MTT in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (5 mg/ml) was added to
each well and the plates were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Removing the liq-
uid and adding dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (100 ml) to dissolve the MTT
formazan. The optical density (OD) for each well was measured on a mi-
croplate reader at a wavelength of 490 nm. All cytotoxicity tests were carried
out 3 times parallelly, IC50 values were got from curves constructed by plot-
ting cell survival (%) versus compound concentration (in mM).
6
4
2
6
4
1
5
22
2
3
ꢀ
1
(
3
38.05), H 4.79 (4.65), N 5.76 (5.92), Pt 41.38 (41.23). IR (KBr, cm ):
413—3102 (m, n ), 2936, 2861 (m, nC–H), 1596 (s, nCꢂO), 751 (m, gArH).
N–H
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢀH] ꢂ472 (100%). H-NMR (D O, ppm) d: 1.12—2.60
2
(
6
m, 13H, 10H of DACH and 3H of CH ), 3.83—4.27 (m, 2H, C H –CH ),
3
6
4
2
.24—7.15 (m, 4H, C H ).
6 4
Compound B4 Yield 31%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 38.03
1
6
24
2
4
ꢀ
1
(
3
38.17), H 4.90 (4.77), N 5.82 (5.57), Pt 38.93 (38.77). IR (KBr, cm ):
418—3111 (m, n ), 2936, 2862 (m, n ), 1597 (s, nCꢂO), 750 (m, gArH).
Result and Discussion
For the synthesis of the ligand (HL), it is hard to directly
N–H
C–H
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢁCH OCH COO ] ꢂ592 (100%). H-NMR (D O, ppm)
3
2
2
d: 1.06—2.74 (m, 10H of DACH), 3.19—3.43 (m, 5H of CH OCH COO), get a N-monsubstituted derivative due to the equivalent reac-
3
2
3
.76—4.04 (m, 2H, C H –CH ), 6.30—7.07 (m, 4H, C H ).
tivity of the two amino groups in DACH. Thus, mono-Boc
protecting DACH was used as the starting material, and the
ligand was synthesized via several synthetic steps.
When preparing the targeted platinum compounds, we first
6
4
2
6
4
Compound B5 Yield 33%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 39.21
21)
1
7
26
2
4
ꢀ
1
(
39.46), H 5.20 (5.03), N 5.58 (5.42), Pt 37.49 (37.74). IR (KBr, cm ):
432—3112 (m, nN–H), 2934, 2863 (m, n ), 1597 (s, nCꢂO), 749 (m, gArH).
3
C–H
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢁCH CH OCH COO ] ꢂ620 (100%). H-NMR (D O,
3
2
2
2
ppm) d: 0.84—2.74 (m, 13H, 10H of DACH and 3H of CH ), 3.19—3.49 synthesized the intermediate [PtLI] by adopting a similar
3
2
3)
(
4
m, 4H of CH OCH COO), 3.67—4.09 (m, 2H, C H –CH ), 6.25—7.07 (m, method described literaturally.
And then AgNO3 was
2
2
6
4
2
H, C H ).
6 4
used to remove the iodide anions of [PtLI] to form
[PtL(H O)]NO , which was in situ reacted with sodium salts
of the corresponding acids, respectively, to give compounds
Compound B6 Yield 23%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 40.52
1
8
28
2
4
ꢀ
1
2
3
(
3
40.68), H 5.11 (5.27), N 5.42 (5.27), Pt 36.88 (36.72). IR (KBr, cm ):
428—3114 (m, n ), 2934, 2863 (m, nC–H), 1598 (s, nCꢂO), 748 (m, gArH).
N–H
ꢀ
ꢀ
1
ESI-MS m/z: [MꢀH] ꢂ530 (100%). H-NMR (D O, ppm) d: 1.01—2.72 B1 to B8 (Chart 1) .
2
1
(
m, 16H, 10H of DACH and 6H of 2CH )), 3.19—3.66 (m, 3H of
3
All platinum complexes were characterized by IR, H-
CHOCH COO), 3.76—4.08 (m, 2H, C H –CH ), 6.29—7.07 (m, 4H, C H ).
Compound B7 Yield 34%, Found (Calcd for C H N O Pt), C 41.56
41.83), H 5.33 (5.50), N 5.21 (5.14), Pt 35.91 (35.79). IR (KBr, cm ):
419—3110 (m, nN–H), 2935, 2863 (m, nC–H), 1596 (s, nCꢂO), 751 (m, gArH).
2
6
4
2
6
4
NMR, ESI-MS spectra and microanalyses. The elemental
analysis results are in good agreement with the calculated
values. The IR spectra of these complexes are similar, Pt–N
1
9
30
2
4
ꢀ
1
(
3
Chart 1. Synthetic Chart for Platinum(II) Compounds B1—B8