140
S. Aitipamula et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1005 (2011) 134–140
Table 5
Thermal data (DSC and TGA) for NSMZ solvates.
Solid form
Calculated
weight loss (%)
Observed weight
loss in TGA (%)
D
H for guest
Guest loss temp
range in TGA (°C)
Boiling point
of guest (°C)
loss (JgÀ1
)
NSMZ-Hydrate
NSMZ-AA
NSMZ-MeOH
NSMZ-Dioxane
5.55
8.93
9.47
12.57
5.41
8.23
9.20
13.04
61.07
90.27
150.49
47.04
60–90
100–136
63–90
100
118.1
64.7
101
100–120
resulted in NSMZ-AA could mean that the entropic factors domi-
nate during nucleation. To further evaluate the lattice energy cal-
culations and to study the preferential crystallization of hydrate/
solvates, competitive crystallization experiments were carried
out by crystallizing NSMZ from a mixture of methanol, and the sol-
vents that produced the solvates in different ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1,
1:1:2, 1:2:1, 2:1:1, etc). The crystals thus obtained were analyzed
by 1H NMR spectroscopy. In all the experiments, NSMZ showed
strong preference for methanol even when one or more of the
other solvents were present in excess. The 1H NMR spectrum of
the crystals obtained from these experiments showed a doublet
at d = 3.16 for the methyl group and a quartet at d = 4.10 ppm for
the hydroxyl group of the methanol.
structures. Methanol solvate has been identified as energetically
most stable among the various solid forms of N4-acetylsulfamer-
azine by the crystal lattice energy calculations. These results are
also consistent with the observations made in the competitive
crystallization experiments. However, the thermal stability of the
acetic acid solvate is higher than the hydrate and methanol solvate.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Science and Engineering Research
Council of A⁄STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research),
Singapore.
All the solvates/hydrate are analyzed by DSC and TGA. The DSC
and TGA traces are shown in Fig. 8 and the thermal data are tabu-
lated in Table 5. The DSC thermograms show two distinct endo-
therms, whereas the first endotherm was ascribed to the solvent
loss from the crystal lattice, the second endotherm is due to melt-
ing of the desolvated material at 246 °C. The release of solvent from
the crystal lattice was observed at the boiling point of the respec-
tive solvent, except that the release of water that started at 60 °C.
Weight loss measurements in the TGA analysis are in good agree-
ment with the quantity of the solvent present in the crystal lattices
of the hydrate/solvates. Interestingly, the TGA profile of the NSMZ-
AA shows two steps for the release of acetic acid from the crystal
lattice. Upon release of the solvent molecules, the solids decom-
pose upon melting after 250 °C which was observed in the TGA
profile as a continuous weight loss step after this temperature.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
include ORTEP diagrams, 1H NMR analysis of the hydrate/solvates.
CCDC 824754–824757 contain the crystallographic data for the
crystal structure reported in this paper. These data can be obtained
free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
References
[1] D.D. MacNicol, F. Toda, R. Bishop (Eds.), Solid-State Supramolecular Chemistry,
Crystal Engineering, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry, vol. 6,
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1996.
[2] U.J. Griesser, in: R. Hilfiker (Ed.), Polymorphism in the Pharmaceutical
Industry, Springer, Berlin, 2006, pp. 211–233.
[3] S. Aitipamula, P.S. Chow, R.B.H. Tan, CrystEngComm 13 (2011) 1037–1045.
[4] D.E. Braun, V. Kahlenberg, T. Gelbrich, J. Ludescher, U.J. Griesser,
CrystEngComm 10 (2008) 1617–1625.
[5] N. Schultheiss, J.P. Smit, J.A. Hanko, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 38 (2009) 498–503.
[6] F.D. Murphy, J.K. Clark, H.F. Flippen, Am. J. Med. Sci. 205 (1943) 717–726.
[7] J.K. Clark, H.F. Flippen, F.D. Murphy, Am. J. Med. Sci. 205 (1943) 846–851.
[8] D.P. Earle Jr., J. Clin. Invest. 23 (1944) 914–920.
[9] G.B. Forbes, A. Perley, J. Dehlinger, J. Pediatr. 28 (1946) 24–36.
[10] J.F.M. Nouws, D. Mevius, T.B. Vree, M. Baakman, M. Degen, Am. J. Vet. Res. 49
(1988) 1059–1065.
[11] J.F.M. Nouws, D. Mevius, T.B. Vree, M. Degen, Veterin Quarterly 11 (1989) 78–
86.
[12] R.O. Roblin Jr., P.S. Winneck, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62 (1940) 2002–2005.
[13] C.-H. Gu, K. Chatterjee, V. Young Jr., D.J.W. Grant, J. Cryst. Growth. 235 (2002)
471–481.
[14] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-97 and SHELXL-97, Programs for the Solution and
Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany,
1997.
[15] Y. Gong, E. Lu, Y. Zhang, V.G. Young Jr., D.J.W. Grant, Acta Crystallogr. E62
(2006) o4245–o4246.
[16] A. Nangia, Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 595–604.
4. Conclusions
We have reported three solvates and a monohydrate of N4-acet-
ylsulfamerazine. All the solvates/hydrate have been characterized
by 1H NMR spectroscopy, thermal analysis and their crystal struc-
tures have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. All
the crystal structures feature NSMZ dimers connected via a pair of
intermolecular N–HÁ Á ÁN hydrogen bonds. However, the overall
crystal structures of the hydrate and dioxane solvate are different
from the other two solvates. The crystal structure of hydrate can
be represented as a 2D hydrogen bonded sheet structure, while
the methanol and acetic acid solvates contain hydrogen bonded
ladder networks, and the 1,4-dioxane solvate can be represented
as 1D hydrogen bonded chains involving the solvent molecules.
Conformational and computational analysis revealed that N4-acet-
ylsulfamerazine adopts different conformations in the crystal