114
T. Mathew et al. / Journal of Catalysis 222 (2004) 107–116
between phenol conversion and 2,4-dtBP selectivity under
most conditions hints that 2,4-dtBP production is controlled
by first-order dependent phenol conversion and sequential
butylation of 2-tBP. High 4-tBP selectivity on x = 0.5 at
high IB:PhOH ratio (Fig. 2a) indicates the surface could be
dominated by Co, as in x = 0.5@300 ◦C.
and mesoporous materials [7,9]. However the requirement
for strong acidic sites for 2,4-dtBP on the above-mentioned
material is contrary to the present results, suggesting the p-
tert-butylation mechanism is different on ferrites. It is to be
noted that the catalyst having intermediate acid–base char-
acter (x = 0.5) has maximum yields of 2,4-dtBP and 2-tBP.
Alkylation of phenols, just like other aromatic com-
pounds, follows the Friedel–Kraft mechanism. From elec-
trophilic substitution it is clear that the tert-butyl cation at-
tacks the phenol ring preferentially in positions ortho and/or
para to the –OH group. The ratio of isomers formed ini-
tially is kinetically controlled and is determined by phenolic
OH groups and incoming tert-butyl cations in the present
case. Though the mono-tert-butylated phenols are more ac-
tive than phenol, subsequent tertiary butylation occurs only
when there is less steric hindrance.
Phenol is adsorbed as phenolate by dissociative adsorp-
tion on an acid–base site. Simultaneously, protonation of IB
occurs due to H+ from the above process. The protonated
IB rearranges to give an appreciably stable tert-butyl cation,
which in turn attacks phenoxide either from the adsorbed or
gaseous state. The relatively high selectivity of 2-tBP than
4-tBP indicates that the carbocation attacks preferentially
from the adsorbed state. However, high Co content reverses
the above trend and favors para-tert-butylation probably
from gas phase. FT-IR investigation of phenol methylation
with methanol on Cu1−xCoxFe2O4 shows exclusive ortho-
alkylation, due to the close proximity of the ortho positions
of phenoxide to the catalyst surface, compared with the para
positions [33]. Once formed, 2-tBP acts as a precursor to the
formation of 2,4-dtBP. Nonetheless, steric hindrance of the
tert-butyl group prevents the further attack by IB at the ortho
position of already formed 2-tBP, illustrating negligible for-
mation of 2,6-dtBP. In addition, once the 2-tBP forms, the
phenyl ring cannot be coplanar to the catalyst surface due
to the bulky size of the t-butyl group, indicating the para
position of the phenyl ring is far removed from the surface
and supported by negligible second ortho tertiary butylation.
However, the tert-butyl cation can attack, from the gaseous
state, phenol or 2-tBP, resulting in the formation of 4-tBP
and 2,4-dtBP, respectively. This is in contrast to the reac-
tion between phenol and any alcohol where the formation
of para alkylated product is < 1% [22]. Tertiary butylation
of phenol has been carried out with tert-butyl alcohol and
the conversion was found to be ꢀ 5% under any condition
and hardly any 4-tBP was detected [22]. This clearly indi-
cates that both IB and tert-butyl alcohol in the adsorbed state
might not produce any p-alkylated product over the present
catalyst system. The above results and discussion hint that
both Hinshelwood and Eley–Rideal mechanisms are possi-
ble for tertiary butylation on Cu1−xCoxFe2O4.
From WHSV studies it is clear that the selectivities of
2-tBP and 2,4-dtBP show reverse trends with a changing
contact time. Due to long contact time sequential alkylation
is increasingly feasible at low WHSV and entirely supports
the high selectivity of 2,4-dtBP at low WHSV. The foregoing
facts indicate the reaction is kinetically controlled and prod-
uct distribution can be optimized. Further, they also demon-
strate an increase in the selectivity of 2,4-dtBP at the expense
of 2-tBP. An increase in 2-tBP selectivity with increasing
WHSV indicates that 2-tBP is preferred over other products
at short contact time, probably due to phenol orientation on
the catalyst surface, which is easily ortho-butylated. Possi-
ble dealkylation reactions at higher temperatures may also
account for a decrease in the selectivity of 2,4-dtBP. Lower
t-butylation activity at higher temperatures is due to the side
reactions of IB with to butylenes and aliphatics.
4.2. Reaction mechanism
A detailed investigation of the acid–base properties of
the Cu1−xCoxFe2O4 catalyst system was carried out sepa-
rately [23]. Important points from FT-IR studies help in gain-
ing an understanding of tertiary butylation activity: (1) The
Cu1−xCoxFe2O4 surface is dominated by Lewis acid char-
acter. (2) A relatively weak acidic character at x = 0 in-
creases with Co content to highly acidic character at x = 1.0
with an increase in number and strength of acidic sites (Ta-
ble 1). (3) The basic character of the catalyst decreases with
increasing x. (4) The acid–base character on the catalyst
surface is due predominantly to octahedral cations, and the
Lewis acidity changes significantly depending on the eas-
ily reducible (Cu2+) or nonreducible (Co2+) ions in the
neighborhood. Generally, robust Co2+ in the neighborhood
increases the acidity. A simple comparison of phenol con-
version and acid–base character demonstrates that neither
strong acidic nor strong basic character helps the tertiary
butylation reaction. It is also evident that the intermediate
acid–base character observed for the x = 0.5 composition
(Tables 1 and 2) with high catalytic activity indicates an
optimum level of acid–base sites are required for better cat-
alytic performance in terms of phenol conversion and over-
all product yield. Strong acidity promotes oligomerization
and cracking of IB; thus the conversion of phenol is ex-
pected to be lower, which is the case with Co-rich composi-
tions (Fig. 2b). In addition, butyl phenols may also undergo
dealkylation in the presence of strong acid sites, account-
ing for the low conversion of phenol at x ꢁ 0.75. However,
the highly acidic property at x = 1 improves 4-tBP selectiv-
ity. It is in agreement that strong acid sites favor 4-tBP and
weak to moderate acid sites favor 2-tBP as in zeolites [11]
4.3. Electronic structure aspects
That (phenol + IB) creates a reducing atmosphere is con-
firmed by the observation of H2, CO, and cracked products