Mac ´ı as-Ruvalcaba and Evans
more negative than those of 6 by about 0.14 V. Simulation
parameters are also given in Table 3, and other examples of
fits of simulations to the voltammograms of 7 in acetonitrile
with 0.33 M water are given in the Supporting Information
and without added water. The same mechanism was found to
hold for benzoyl cyanide in DMF. The mechanism consists of
the initial formation of anion radicals that undergo a relatively
rapid dimerization reaction. The resulting dimer dianion, 2, loses
cyanide to produce the anion of the monocyanohydrin of benzil,
3. This final species participates in two parallel reactions: loss
of cyanide to form benzil, 5, and rearrangement to the anion of
mandelonitrile benzoate, 4. We have found that small amounts
of benzil are formed in the absence of added water, and,
(Figures S9 and S10).
We were not able to fit the voltammograms of chloro
derivative 8 for acetonitrile with no added water. The principal
difficulty is that the peak for reduction of 4,4′-dichlorobenzil
is not well resolved from the main reduction peak. Somewhat
clearer results were obtained in the presence of water. Figure 7
shows data for 2.19 mM 8 in acetonitrile with 0.66 M water at
14
consistent with the electrosynthetic results, benzil formation
is enhanced in the presence of water.
1
.00 V/s. Data with 0.33 M added water were also fit by
simulation; the simulation parameters for both water concentra-
tions are given in Table 4, and other examples of fits of
simulations to the voltammograms of 8 in acetonitrile with 0.33
and 0.66 M water are given in the Supporting Information
Experimental Section
Chemicals and Reagents. The solvent for electrochemistry was
acetonitrile or N,N-dimethylformamide, and the electrolyte was 0.10
M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate. Sources and treatment
(Figures S11 and S12).
At 0.33 M water, where comparison among the three
17
of the solvents and electrolyte have been described. Benzoyl
compounds is possible, the dimerization rate constant decreases
cyanide, 6, was a commercial sample. Benzoyl cyanides 7 and 8
were prepared by reaction of 0.02 mol of the corresponding benzoyl
chloride with 0.023 mol of cuprous cyanide according to the
methodology described by Oakwood and Weisgerber and were
purified by column chromatography with 90:10 hexane/ethyl acetate
mixture as eluent, followed by recrystallization from hexane (7,
5
-1 -1
in the order X ) Cl (8) (5.7 × 10 M s ) > X ) H (6) (3.1
5
-1 -1
5
-1 -1
×
10 M s ) > X ) CH3O (7) (1.8 × 10 M s ). This
1
8
small effect may be due to the ability of the electron-
withdrawing substituent to lower the energy of the transition
state where the two negatively charged acyl anions, ArC(O) ,
-
1
9
20
mp 58.7-59.9 °C, lit. 56.5-57.5 °C, lit. 59.0 °C; 8, mp 41.5-
come together to dimerize. Interestingly, in the absence of added
water the trend is reversed for 6 and 7 (see Tables 1 and 3). In
the case of the chloro derivative with 0.33 M water, the standard
potentials for reduction of 8 and its corresponding benzil are
shifted in the positive direction by 0.08 and 0.12 V, respectively,
compared to those of 6. These shifts, of course, are caused by
the electron-withdrawing nature of the chloro substituent. Also,
for 6 and 7 the standard potentials for the benzoyl cyanide/
benzoyl cyanide anion radical couple and for the benzil/benzil
anion radical couple are shifted slightly (12-40 mV) toward
less negative potentials in acetonitrile with 0.33 M water
compared to that with no added water. These shifts reflect
hydrogen-bonding interactions of water with the anion radicals.
All three compounds, 6-8, were studied in the electrosyn-
2.3 °C, lit. 41-42 °C,19 lit. 42.0 °C ).
20
4
Electrochemical Cells, Electrodes, and Instrumentation. These
were as described earlier.17 The working electrode was a 0.3-cm-
diameter glassy carbon electrode whose area was determined to be
2
0
.0814 cm . The reference electrode was a silver wire immersed
4 6 3
in 0.10 M Bu NPF /0.010 M AgNO in acetonitrile. The potential
of this reference electrode was periodically measured versus the
reversible ferrocene/ferrocenium potential, and all potentials re-
ported in this work are with respect to ferrocene. Evaluation of the
solution resistance has been described.17 The temperature was
maintained at 298 K.
Variation of the scan rate, V, was done in such a way that there
was an approximately linear variation in log V. Thus, for scan rates
between 0.1 and 30 V/s, the values chosen were 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5,
1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 V/s (log V ) -1, -0.699, -0.523, -0.301,
0, 0.301, 0.477, 0.699, 1, 1.301, 1.477).
thetic work, and the yields of benzil obtained in acetonitrile/
water were very similar, 62-67%.14
Digital simulations were conducted with the aid of DigiElch,
version 2.0, a free software package for the Digital simulation of
common Electrochemical experiments (http://www.digielch.de).
Part of the solution resistance was compensated electronically, and
the remainder was included in the simulation program.
Conclusion
2
1
The electrochemical reduction of three benzoyl cyanides has
been shown to occur by reactions 1-5 in acetonitrile both with
(
17) Mac ´ı as-Ruvalcaba, N. A.; Evans, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005,
Acknowledgment. Support of this research by the National
Science Foundation, Grant CHE 0347471, is gratefully ac-
knowledged.
1
09, 14642-14647.
(
18) Oakwood, T. S.; Weisgerber, C. A. Org. Synth. 1944, 24, 14-16.
(19) Cao, Y.-Q.; Du, Y.-F.; Chen, B.-H.; Li, J.-T. Synth. Commun. 2004,
3
4, 2951-2957.
20) Olah, G. A.; Arvanaghi, M.; Surya Prakash, G. K. Synthesis 1983,
36-637.
(
Supporting Information Available: Examples of fits of
simulation to background-corrected voltammograms of 6-8 under
various conditions (Figures S1-S12). This material is available free
of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
6
(21) (a) Rudolph, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 543, 23-29. (b)
Rudolph, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 571, 289-307. (c) Rudolph, M.
J. Electroanal. Chem. 2003, 558, 171-176. (d) Rudolph, M. J. Comput.
Chem. 2005, 26, 619-632. (e) Rudolph, M. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26,
6
33-641. (f) Rudolph, M. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1193-1204.
JO062181E
594 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 2, 2007