corresponding diazonium species and subsequently coupled
with olefins. This methodology was extended by Bra¨se et
al. to solid-phase organic synthesis.7 However, the use of
strong protic acids such as TFA and HBF4 should still be a
significant limitation considering their compatibility with
functional groups and organometallic reagents. Actually, the
Suzuki-Miyaura-type coupling reaction with phenylboronic
acid was attempted, but the results were not necessarily
satisfactory, as described by the authors themselves.7a
Reported herein is the first observation that the 1-aryl-
triazenes can be directly coupled with areneboronic acids in
the presence of a palladium catalyst, phosphine ligand, and
boron trifluoride. Our working hypothesis for the Lewis acid
induced cross-coupling reaction, in which a diaryl-palladium
intermediate is formed in a concerted process, is depicted in
Figure 1. It can be expected here that the boron trifluoride
The Lewis acid was essential for the formation of the
biphenyl product; without BF3‚OEt2, no reaction occurred
at all. In a control reaction, the 1-aryltriazenes did not react
with boron trifluoride in the absence of either the palladium
catalyst or boronic acids, implying that a concerted process
may be involved. The choice of solvent also significantly
affected the product yield, as shown by the results [solvent
and GC yield (1 h): DME, 98%; THF, 96%; dioxane, 94%;
toluene, 66%; DMF, trace; NMP, 0%]; satisfactory results
were obtained only in ethereal solvents and we chose DME
as the general solvent on the basis of the reaction rate.
The screening of catalysts and phosphine ligands re-
vealed that the catalyst system with Pd2(dba)3 and P(tBu)3
was the most effective, regardless of their ratio, giving rise
to the coupling product in a yield of 98% (Table 1, entries
1 and 2).
Table 1. Optimization of Catalyst Systema
entry
Pd complex
ligand
yield [%]b 10 min, 1 h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd2(dba)3
Pd(PPh3)4
Pd(OAc)2
P(tBu)3
P(tBu)3
none
PPh3
dppb
dppf
PBiph(tBu)2
P(tBu)3
98, 98 (91)d
95, 95
69, 79
80, 83
64, 70
72, 79
28, 47
49, 59
19, 37
c
c
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a direct formation of diaryl-
palladium intermediate in a concerted mechanism.
P(tBu)3
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.50 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), catalyst [Pd content]
(4 mol %), ligand (8 mol %), BF3‚OEt2 (0.50 mmol), room temperature,
DME (5.0 mL). b Yields are determined by GC analysis with eicosane as
an internal standard. c Using 4 mol %. d Isolated yield.
plays two roles during the reaction: (1) the boron trifluoride
serves as a Lewis acid toward the 1-aryltriazene to form an
aryltriazene-boron trifluoride complex to enhance the reac-
tivity of the sp2-carbon-nitrogen bond, and then (2) the
resulting aminotrifluoroborate moiety serves as a fluoride
base to promote a transmetallation of the areneboronic acid.
Hence, the diaryl-palladium species can be directly formed
from the zerovalent palladium complex.
After several tentative experiments, the desired cross-
coupling of 1-(p-tolyl)triazene (1) with p-anisylboronic acid
(2) was achieved with a catalytic amount of Pd2(dba)3 (4
mol %) and P(tBu)3 (8 mol %) together with 1 equiv of
BF3‚OEt2 in DME to afford the biphenyl product 3 in 98%
GC yield within 10 min at room temperature, as shown in
Scheme 1.8
The phosphine-free Pd(0) catalyst gave the coupling
product in 79% yield (entry 3). Whereas the addition of PPh3
and bisphosphines hardly influenced the yield (entries 4-6),
the more bulky ligand, PBiph(tBu)2, significantly sup-
pressed the reaction process (entry 7). Other precatalysts
such as Pd(PPh3)4 and Pd(OAc)2 were less effective (entries
8 and 9).
The scope of the coupling reaction with respect to the
substituent on the 1-aryltriazenes and areneboronic acids was
examined (Table 2).
Aryltriazenes having electron-donating groups at the ortho,
meta, and para positions and a sterically hindered mesityl
and naphthyl groups smoothly underwent the coupling
reaction (entries 1-5 and 13). On the other hand, electron-
withdrawing groups such as halogens, triflate, and acetyl
substituents decreased the yields to some extent (entries
6-11). Notably, the triazene moiety showed a higher
chemoselectivity over the triflate group as well as the
bromine atom9,10 as a leaving group under the stated reaction
Scheme 1
(7) (a) Bra¨se, S.; Schroen, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 1071.
(b) Bra¨se, S.; Kirchhoff, J. H.; Ko¨bberling, Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 885.
(8) Triazenes having a diethylamino or morpholino moiety at the
3-position were less effective under the reaction conditions, and areneboronic
esters were completely inert.
618
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 4, 2004