1902
S. S. Dhaneshwar et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1897–1902
In order to study the ameliorating effect of azo prodrug
of 5-ASA on the inflamed tissue of colon in IBD, trini-
trobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced experimental
colitis model was selected which is simple and reproduc-
ible. Moreover, it is the most relevant model as it in-
volves the use of immunological haptens and develops
a chronic inflammation rather than an acute mucosal
injury.22 By this model in vivo characterization of the
azo carrier system under the influence of chronic inflam-
matory symptoms was possible. Sprague–Dawley rats
(average weight 200–230 g; 12–15 w; n = 6/group) were
used. They were distributed into six different groups,
i.e. healthy control, colitis control, two standard groups
and two test groups. They were housed in a room with
controlled temperature (22 ꢁC). The animals were food
fasted 48 h before experimentation and allowed food
and water ad libitum after the administration of TNBS.
To induce an inflammation, all the groups except
healthy control group were treated by a procedure dis-
cussed below. After light narcotizing with ether, the rats
were catheterized 8 cm intrarectal and 500 ll of TNBS
(Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai) in ethanol
was injected into colon via rubber canula (dose was
150 mg/kg of body weight of TNBS in ethanol, 50%
solution). Animals were then maintained in a vertical
position for 30 sec and returned to their cages. For 3
days the rats were housed without treatment to maintain
the development of a full inflammatory bowel disease
model. The animals of standard and test groups received
orally 5-ASA, sulfasalazine, D-phenylalanine and SP,
respectively, once daily for five continuous days at doses
equimolar to 5-ASA present in sulfasalazine. The
healthy control and colitis control groups received only
1% carboxymethylcellulose instead of free drug or pro-
drug. The animals of all groups were examined for
weight loss, stool consistency and rectal bleeding
throughout the 11 days study. Colitis activity was quan-
tified with a clinical activity score assessing these param-
eters (Fig. 2) by clinical activity scoring rate. The clinical
activity score was determined by calculating the average
of the above three parameters for each day, for each
group, and was ranging from 0 (healthy) to 4 (maximal
activity of colitis).23 They were sacrificed 24 h after the
last drug administration by isoflurane anaesthesia and
a segment of colon, 8 cm long, was excised and colon/
body weight ratio was determined to quantify the inflam-
mation (Fig. 3). Tissue segments 1 cm in length were then
fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histopathological
studies. Histopathological studies (Fig. 4a–e) of the
colon were carried out using haematoxylin and eosin
stains, at Nucleus Pathology Laboratory, Pune. Col-
oured microscopical images of the colon sections were
taken on Zeiss optical microscope, Stemi 2000-C, with
resolution 5 · 20X, attached with trinocular camera at
Kolte Pathology Laboratory, Pune.
References and notes
1. Bonner, G. F. South Med. J. 1996, 89, 556.
2. Brzezinski, A.; Rankin, G. B.; Seidner, D. L.; Lshner, B.
A. Clev. Clin. J. Med. 1995, 62, 317.
3. Bonner, G. B.; Ruderman, W. B. In Inflammopharmacol-
ogy; Kluwer Academic: Norwell-Mass, 1993; pp 247–262.
4. Chourasia, M. K.; Jain, S. K. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 6, 33.
5. Sands, B. E. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, S68.
6. Sutherland, L. R.; Rothy, D. E.; Beck, P. L. Inflamm.
Bowel. Dis. 1997, 3, 65.
7. Mahmud, N.; Kamm, M. A.; Dupas, J. L. Gut 2001, 49,
552.
8. Rao, S. S. C.; Read, N. W.; Holdsworth, C. D. Gut 1987,
28, 1474.
9. Meyers, B. E.; Moonka, D. K.; Davis, R. H. Inflammation
1979, 3, 225.
10. Rubinstein, A.; Nakar, D.; Sintov, A. Pharm. Res. 1992, 9,
276.
11. Rainsford, K. D. Proc. Br. Pharmacol. Soc. 1980, 226.
12. Rainsford, K. D. Agents Actions 1975, 5, 553.
13. Morris, G. P.; Beck, P. L.; Herridge, M. S.; Drew, W. T.
Gastroenterology 1989, 96, 795.
14. Zingarelli, B.; Squadrito, F.; Graziani, P.; Camerini, R.;
Caputi, A. P. Agents Actions 1993, 39, 150.
15. Li, T. World J. Gasteroenterol. 2003, 9, 1028.
16. Indian Pharmacopoeia, 1996, Vol. II, Appendix 13, A144–
145.
17. Nielsen, N. M.; Bundgaard, H. J. Pharm. Sci. 1988, 77,
285.
18. Uekama, K.; Minami, K.; Hirayama, F. J. Med. Chem.
1997, 40, 2755.
19. Dhaneshwar, Suneela; Chaturvedi, S. C. Indian Drugs
1994, 31, 374.
20. Furniss, B. S.; Hannaford, A. J.; Smith, P. W. G.;
Tatchell, A. R. In Vogel’s Textbook of Practical Organic
Chemistry, 4th ed.; The English Language Bookman:
London, 1978; pp 688–690.
21. March, J. In Advanced Organic Chemistry—Reactions,
Mechanisms and Structure, 3rd ed.; Wiley Eastern Ltd,
1986; pp 688–690.
22. Yamada, T.; Marshall, S.; Specian, R. D.; Grisham, M. B.
Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 1524.
23. Hartmann, G.; Bidlingamaier, C.; Seigmund, B.;
Albrich, S.; Schulze, J.; Tschoep, K.; Eigler, A.;
Lehr, H. A.; Endres, S. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
2000, 292, 22.