actually eliminated its activity as a topoisomerase I-dependent
cytotoxin. A potential rationalization for these results is
possible based on a crystal structure of a topoisomerase
I-DNA complex containing a CPT analogue.10 In this
structure, a hydrogen bond network exists between residues
Asp533 and Arg364 of topoisomerase I and the C20-OH
group of CPT, thus creating a possible steric clash between
the clustered C14-H and C20-OH/ethyl groups.
To test this hypothesis, the synthesis and biochemical
evaluation of the water-soluble 14-azaCPT (4) was carried
out.9,11 It was found that 4 stabilized the topoisomerase
I-DNA complex at the same sites as CPT and was cytotoxic
with a similar but somewhat greater IC50 value. Further, it
was also shown that 14-azaCPT mediated inhibition of DNA
relaxation more effectively than CPT. Critically, 4 possessed
a faster off-rate from the ternary complex than CPT. It
appears that replacing the C14-H group with N does
improve the ability to form the ternary complex while
concomitantly reducing the lifetime of the formed complex,
thus reducing the cytotoxic effects of the resulting analogue.
discrepancy is due to differences in the off-rates of individual
CPTs from the formed ternary complexes; those CPT
analogues having slower off-rates tend to be more cytotoxic.
Given these interesting biological results, we hypothesized
that altering structural features in different regions of the
molecule could provide a way to modulate the off-rate.
Previously, it had been shown that the 10,11-methylenedioxy
(MDO) group increases the stability of the topoisomerase
I-DNA complex, thus diminishing the off-rate.14a By
incorporating this structural feature into the 14-aza core, it
seemed that it might be possible to maintain the stabilization
and inhibitory properties of CPT while decreasing the off-
rate, thus making a more effective topoisomerase I poison
and anticancer therapeutic candidate. The synthesis and initial
biological testing of 10,11-MDO-14-azaCPT (5) are pre-
sented herein.
The synthesis of 10,11-MDO-14-azaCPT is outlined in
Schemes 1 and 2. The required dibromide 9 was prepared
Previously, it was found that the key event leading to cell
death was the persistence of the ternary complex, which can
be converted to a double-strand break in DNA as a
consequence of interaction with a moving replication fork.12
Numerous studies now support the thesis that failure to
resolve the formed protein-DNA complex, i.e., persistence
of the complex, is correlated to the development of a
cytotoxic response.13 Although the concentration of topoi-
somerase I-DNA-CPT ternary complexes formed at equi-
librium logically constitutes the source of the cytotoxic
response resulting from treatment with CPT (analogues), it
has been shown convincingly that CPT analogues that
promote ternary complex formation to comparable extents
can nonetheless differ in the cytotoxic response that they
promote.14 The available data argue that much of the apparent
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Dibromide 9
in four steps from commercially available 3,4-(methylene-
dioxy)aniline which was initially acetylated to afford 6 in
(5) (a) Hutchinson, C. R. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1047. (b) Hertzberg, R.
P.; Caranfa, M. J.; Holden, K. G.; Jakas, D. R.; Gallagher, G.; Mattern, M.
R.; Mong, S.-M.; Bartus, J. O.; Johnson, R. K.; Kingsbury, W. D. J. Med.
Chem. 1989, 32, 715.
Scheme 2. Completion of the Synthesis of
10,11-MDO-14-azaCPT (5)
(6) (a) Jaxel, C.; Kohn, K. W.; Wani, M. C.; Wall, M. E.; Pommier, Y.
Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 1465. (b) Hertzberg, R. P.; Caranfa, M. J.; Hecht, S.
M. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 4629. (c) Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Hecht, S. M.
Biochemistry 1999, 38, 4374.
(7) Cagir, A.; Jones, S. H.; Gao, R.; Eisenhauer, B. M.; Hecht, S. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13628.
(8) Fox, B. M.; Xiao, X.; Antony, S.; Kohlhagen, G.; Pommier, Y.;
Staker, B. L.; Stewart, L.; Cushman, M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3275.
(9) Cheng, K.; Rahier, N. J.; Eisenhauer, B. M.; Thomas, S. J.; Gao, R.;
Hecht, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 838.
(10) Staker, B. L.; Hjerrild, K.; Feese, M. D.; Behnke, C. A.; Burgin,
A. B., Jr.; Stewart, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 15387.
(11) Rahier, N. J.; Cheng, K.; Gao, R.; Eisenhauer, B. M.; Hecht, S. M.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 835.
(12) (a) Hsiang, Y.-H.; Lihou, M. G.; Liu, L. F. Cancer Res. 1989, 49,
5077. (b) Zhang, H.; D’Arpa, P.; Liu, F. F. Cancer Cells 1990, 2, 23.
(13) (a) Wu, J.; Yin, M.-B.; Hapke, G.; Toth, K.; Rustum, Y. M. Mol.
Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 742. (b) Desai, S. D.; Zhang, H.; Rodriguez-Bauman,
A.; Yang, J.-M.; Wu, X.; Gounder, M. K.; Rubin, E. H.; Liu, L. F. Mol.
Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 2341. (c) Zhang, H.-F.; Tomida, A.; Koshimizu, R.;
Ogiso, Y.; Lei, S.; Tsuruo, T. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 1114. (d) Adachi, N.;
So, S.; Koyama, H. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 37343. (e) van Waardenburg,
R. C. A. M.; deJong, L. A.; Eijndhoven, M. A. J.; Verseyden, C.; Pluim,
D.; Jansen, L. E. T.; Bjornsti, M. A.; Schellens, J. H. M. J. Biol. Chem.
2004, 279, 54502. (f) Deng, C.; Brown, J. A.; You, D.; Brown, J. M.
Genetics 2005, 170, 591. (g) Kuo, C.-C.; Liu, J.-F.; Chang, J.-Y. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 316, 946.
97% yield. Following the procedure of Lavergne et al.,15 we
subjected the acetylated amine to Vilsmeier conditions to
(14) (a) Tanizawa, A.; Kohn, K. W.; Kohlhagen, G.; Leteurtre, F.;
Pommier, Y. Biochemistry 1995, 34 7200. (b) Wang, X.; Wang, L.-K.;
Kingsbury, W. D.; Johnson, R. K.; Hecht, S. M. Biochemistry 1998, 37,
9399. (c) Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Hecht, S. M. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 4374.
3514
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 16, 2006