Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Natural Product Synthesis
A Method for the Late-Stage Formation of Ketones, Acyloins, and
Aldols from Alkenylstannanes: Application to the Total Synthesis of
Paecilonic Acid A
Abstract: Treatment of alkenylstannanes with Cu(OAc)2/Et3N
affords the corresponding enol esters or ketones under
conditions that proved compatible with many common func-
tionalities; these include groups that would neither survive
under the standard Tamao–Fleming conditions for the oxida-
forming an alkenylstannane of type D as the predominant
isomer. Experimental and computational evidence shows that
this pattern is innately linked to the dual role played by the
ꢀ
polarized [Ru Cl] unit of the catalyst, which serves as
ꢀ
hydrogen bond acceptor for the OH group of substrate A
tion of Csp2 SiR3 bonds nor under the conditions commonly
and, at the same time, steers the incoming R3SnH reagent.[2,6]
These concurrent interactions impose directionality onto the
coordination sphere of the loaded catalyst B and the derived
metallacyclopropene C, which translates into high levels of
selectivity. Although the directing effect gets weaker upon
increasing the distance between the hydroxy group and the
triple bond, it remains appreciable in the conversion of
homopropargylic alcohol F to the corresponding stannane
G.[1,2]
ꢀ
ꢀ
used to oxidize C B bonds. Chiral centers adjacent to the
unveiled carbonyls are not racemized and competing proto-
destannation is marginal, even if the substrate carries unpro-
ꢀ
tected OH groups as internal proton sources. Therefore, the
procedure is well suited for the preparation of acyloin and
aldol derivatives. These enabling virtues are illustrated by
a concise approach to the bicyclic lipid paecilonic acid A.
H
ydrostannation of propargyl alcohols A catalyzed by
The resulting structural motifs D and G provide ample
ꢀ
[Cp*RuCl]4 is distinguished by excellent levels of regio- and
stereocontrol as well as by an exquisite functional group
compatibility (Scheme 1).[1,2] The reaction follows an unusual
trans-addition mode[3–5] and faithfully delivers the tin moiety
to the C-atom of the alkyne proximal to the hydroxy group,
opportunity for downstream functionalization of the C Sn
bond. Ideally, any such method should be compatible with the
ꢀ
OH group in the vicinity, which cannot be taken for granted
since protodestannation is usually facile.[1,7] To this end, our
group has recently developed conditions that allow substrates
of type D to be engaged in Stille-type coupling with MeI,[8]
methoxycarbonylation,[9] or fluoro-destannation reactions.[10]
Conversion of the alkenylstannane entity in D or G to the
corresponding carbonyl is yet another possibility. Attractive
ꢀ
methods for the oxidation of C Sn bonds, however, are
basically unknown, certainly if one expects compatibility with
other functionality and/or additional sites of unsatura-
tion.[11–14] Even the more widely exercised oxidation of C B
ꢀ
ꢀ
and C Si bonds, despite its preparative value, shows only
a limited functional group tolerance.[11,15–19] Rather than
searching for an oxidant with an adequate profile, we
conjectured that formal cross-coupling of the alkenyltin
entity with an appropriate O-nucleophile might be a better
way of securing the desirable orthogonality. Inspiration came
from the formation of ether and ester derivatives by copper-
mediated reactions of organoboron derivatives with different
O-nucleophiles (Chan–Lam–Evans coupling).[20,21] Although
the current mechanistic understanding of this transformation
suggests that organotin compounds also qualify as starting
materials,[22] the few reported examples met with only limited
success. Whereas the somewhat exotic compound Ph3SnCl
was reported to react well with excess phenol in the presence
of Cu(OAc)2 and Et3N as the solvent,[23] the more common
substrates of type ArSnBu3 gave the expected diarylethers in
modest yields, even when they were used in (large)
Scheme 1. Directed trans-hydrostannation/oxidation sequence;
*
denotes a CMe unit.
[*] Dr. H. Sommer,[+] Dr. J. Y. Hamilton,[+] Prof. Dr. A. Fꢀrstner
Max-Planck-Institut fꢀr Kohlenforschung
45470 Mꢀlheim/Ruhr (Germany)
E-mail: fuerstner@kofo.mpg.de
[+] These authors contributed equally to this work.
excess.[24,25] Likewise, C N bond formation required two
ꢀ
equivalents of ArSnMe3 (rather than the less toxic ArSnBu3)
Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for
the author(s) of this article can be found under:
for high conversion.[26]
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1
These are not the final page numbers!