in situ formation of Cu(II)-based catalyst systems in the
presence of aryl-nitroso species,9 we began to explore the
potential for developing a hydroxamic acid oxidation
procedure which did not involve peroxides or other strong
oxidants. Indeed, from the point of view of developing an
environmetally benign oxidation process, an aerobic oxi-
dation was highly attractive. Among potential oxidative
systems that could be employed for such a process, we
examined various palladium(II) systems with ligands that
included thioureas, oxazolines, and phosphines, together
with co-oxidants such as copper(II) salts because related
systems have been employed for other oxidative transforma-
tions.10 These were screened for the in situ oxidation of the
Z-protectedhydroxamic acid1 toderivethecorresponding
acyl-nitroso species 2. Formation of intermediate acyl-
nitroso compound 2 was initially followed by trapping
with cyclohexaadiene 3b to give cycloadduct 4b to screen
potential catalytic systems. Preliminary results were en-
couraging; however, more detailed studies revealed that
the palladium(II) salts were not involved, and indeed, it
was in fact the copper(II) salt alone which was acting as a
catalytic oxidant in air, i.e. as outlined in eq 1 (Table 1).
Examination of different copper(II) salts (i.e., CuCl2,
CuBr2, CuI2) and loadings, with different ligands (includng
tetramethylthiourea, 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline and mixed ligand
systems10), showed that CuCl2 (10 mol %), in the presence
of 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline (20 mol %), in air at RT in various
solvents (vide infra) including CHCl3 (eq 1) gave essentially
quantitative conversion of hydroxamic acid 1 to the cy-
cloadduct 4b, which was isolated in 86% yield after
recrystallization. Cycloadduct 4b gave single crystals sui-
table for X-ray structure analysis (see Supporting Infor-
mation (SI)).
Further studies with a variety of dienes (Table 1) re-
vealed that the Cu(II)-catalyzed, room temperature aero-
bic oxidation reaction was indeed a general and useful
process in the solvent CHCl3. Although reaction times
vary from 3 (Table 1, entry 2) to 24 h (Table 1, entries 3 and
5ꢀ7), the isolated yields were universally high, represent-
ing a substantial improvement upon our previous pre-
ferred oxidation systems.8b,d For example, the formation
of the DMA adduct is readily achieved in 24 h in 86% yield
after recrystallization (Table 1, entry 6), contrasting with a
previous best reaction yield of 36% in 96 h using a
ruthenium-salen þ TBHP oxidation system.8b Crystals of
cycloadduct 4f suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction
were grown (see SI). Cycloadduct 4g was also isolated in a
substantially improved yield of 74%, compared with 16%
using an iron catalyst.8d For dienes which are capable of
undergoing both DielsꢀAlder addition and ene-reactions,
the overall yields were also high and we were able to
ascertain accurately the ratio of cycloaddtion to ene pro-
duct. Thus, in the case of 2,3-dimethylbuta-1,3-diene 3c,
reaction with acyl-nitroso species 2 resulted in a 75%
combined yield of an inseparable mixture of products 4c
and 5c in a ratio of 3:1. (Table 1, entry 3). Similarly, when
isoprene 3ewas employed (Table 1, entry 5), the 9:1 ratio of
DielsꢀAlder to ene products obtained was reasonable,
with a 2:1 ratio of regioisomeric DielsꢀAlder adducts 4e
and 4e0 being produced. This shows that the slightly more
electron-rich end of the diene prefers to react at the nitroso
nitrogen atom rather than at oxygen.
Despite the success of the reactions shown in Table 1,
development of a more environmentally benign oxidation
process led to an examination of different solvent systems
for the reaction. Thus, a solvent screen was performed with
2,3-dimethylbutadiene 3c employed as the trapping diene
(Table 2). The effects of solvent upon the rate, yield, and
ratio of competing nitroso-DielsꢀAlder cycloaddition and
ene reactions were studied.14
The reaction was carried out in a range of solvents
(Table 2), with universally high yields being obtained (80
to 89%). All of the reactions carried out in CHCl3 were
then repeated in the preferable, inexpensive solvent
MeOH, as the reaction proceeded at the highest rate in
this solvent (Table 2, entry 1). Significant effects on both
the rate of reaction and the product distribution as a
function of solvent polarity were observed. For example,
the reaction shown in eq 2 was approximately 70 times
(3) (a) Yang, B.; Zhu, Z. C.; Goodson, H. V.; Miller, M. J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3831. (b) Yang, B.; Miller, P. A.; Mollmann,
U.; Miller, M. J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2828. (c) Li, F. Z.; Yang, B. Y.;
Miller, M. J.; Zajicek, J.; Noll, B. C.; Mollmann, U.; Dahse, H.-M.;
Miller, P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2923. (d) Krchnak, V.; Waring, K. R.; Noll,
B. C.; Moellmann, U.; Dahse, H.-M.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 4559. (e) Ruan, B. F.; Pong, K.; Jow, F.; Bowlby, M.; Crozier, R. A.;
Liu, D.; Liang, S.; Chen, Y.; Mercado, M. L.; Feng, X. D.; Bennett, F.;
Schack, D. V.; McDonald, L.; Zaleska, M. M.; Wood, A.; Reinhart,
P. H.; Magolda, R. L.; Skotnicki, J.; Pangalos, M. N.; Koehn, F. E.;
Carter, G. T.; Abou-Gharbia, M.; Graziani, E. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2008, 105, 33. (f) Kirby, G. W.; Mackinnon, J. W. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 887. (g) Kirby, G. W.; Mackinnon, J. W. M.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 1, 23. (h) Kirby, G. W.; Bentley,
K. W.; Horsewood, P.; Singh, S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979,
3064. (i) Kirby, G. W.; Sweeny, J. G. Chem. Commun. 1973, 704.
(4) (a) Sklarz, B.; Al-Sayyab, A. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 1318. (b)
Rowe, J. E.; Ward, A. D. Aust. J. Chem. 1968, 21, 2761. (c) Lerch, U.;
Moffat, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3391.
(5) Lightfoot, A. P.; Pritchard, R. G.; Wan, H.; Warren, J. E.;
Whiting, A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2072.
(6) (a) Kirby, G. W.; Mackinnon, J. W. M.; Sharma, R. P. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1977, 18, 215. (b) Kirby, G. W.; Sweeny, J. G. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1973, 704.
(7) (a) Dao, L. H.; Dusk, J. M.; Mackay, D.; Watson, K. N. Can. J.
Chem. 1979, 57, 1712. (b) N. E. Jenkins, N. E.; Ware, R. W., Jr.;
Atkinson, R. N.; King, S. B. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 947.
(8) (a) Flower, K. R.; Lightfoot, A. P.; Wan, H.; Whiting, A. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 1812. (b) Flower, K. R.; Lightfoot, A. P.; Wan, H.;
Whiting, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2058. (c) Iwasa, S.;
Tajima, K.; Tsushima, S.; Nishiyama, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
5897. (d) Howard, J. A. K.; Ilyashenko, G.; Sparks, H.; Whiting, A.
Dalton Trans. 2007, 2108. (e) Adamo, M. F. A.; Bruschi, S. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 2666.
(9) Howard, J. A. K.; Ilyashenko, G.; Sparkes, H. A.; Whiting, A.;
Wright, A. R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 869.
(11) Kirby, G. W.; McGuigan, H.; Machinnon, J. W. M.; McLean,
D.; Sharma, R. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 1437.
(12) Defoin, A.; Joubert, M.; Heuchel, J.-M.; Strehler, C.; Streith, J.
Synthesis 2000, 12, 1719.
(13) Tolman, V.; Hanus, J.; Sedmera, P. Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 64, 696.
(10) (a) Liang, B.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.-X.; Wongkhan, K.; Shu, D.-X.;
Lan, Y.; Li, A.; Batsanov, A. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Marder, T. B.; Chen,
J.-H.; Yang, Z. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4756. (b) Gao, Y.-X.; Chang,
L.; Shi, H.; Liang, B.; Wongkhan, K.; Chaiyaveij, D.; Batsanov, A. S.;
Marder, T. B.; Li, C.-C.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010,
352, 1955.
(14) Adam, W.; Krebs, O. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4131.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3443