C.-D. CHEN ET AL.
but incomplete regiospecificity? And how does it operate to
adjust the aromatic C–H bond hydroxylation?
added. In the typical procedure, a solution of 0.3 mmol m-CPBA in 1 mL
CH
of 0.3 mmol cyclohexene, 0.3 mmol b-substituted naphthalene, and
.3 mmol F20TPPMnCl in 1 mL CH CN:CH Cl (1:1) solvent at ambient
3 2 2
CN:CH Cl (1:1) solvent was added dropwise to a solution consisting
In order to gain insight into the factors that determine the
regioselectivity of the aromatic C–H bond hydroxylation on
naphthalene derivatives, we studied the hydroxylation of the
aromatic C–H bond on b-substituted naphthalenes catalyzed
by tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin manganese(III) chloride
0
3
2
2
temperature. After 1 h, the concentration of cyclohexene was analyzed
by GC–MS SIM program. In the blank experiment, the procedure was
the same as the procedure described previously without the adding of
b-substituted naphthalene.
3 2 2
(F20TPPMnCl) with m-CPBA in CH CN/CH Cl (1:1) solvent and
further explored the substituent effect on the regioselectivity.
The studies may provide additional proofs for the stepwise
mechanism through a cationic intermediate of the hydroxylation
of the aromatic C–H bond of naphthalene and its derivatives.
Calculation method
Full geometry optimizations for reactants, products, and acylperoxo-
manganese(III) porphyrin intermediate were performed at semi-empirical
PM3 level implemented in the software package Hyperchem 7.0
(
Hypercube Inc., USA). The ground spin states of F20TPPMnCl and its
EXPERIMENTAL
intermediate were at S = 1 state where the bonding energy and total
energy were the lowest. Frontier molecular orbital energies E(HOMO),
E(LUMO), total energy, and ΔH were calculated after the geometry optimi-
zations performed by PM3 method and identified by vibration analysis. All
the calculations were performed on a Gateway NV48 PC (2GHz, 2 GB).
Materials and instruments
The tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin manganese(III) chloride was
prepared by the established synthesis procedures.
[26,27]
m-CPBA was
purchased from Aladdin (Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China) and further
purified through washing with phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4). Its purity was
analyzed using iodometric method. Other reagents were purchased from
Aladdin and used without further purification except that acetonitrile
and dichloromethane were distilled from sodium before used. The gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) qualitative and quantitative
analysis was performed on a Class-5000 GC–MS spectrometer (Shimadzu
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The regioselective hydroxylation of b-substituted
naphthalene
In the studies of the hydroxylation of b-substituted naphthalenes
with m-CPBA and without any catalyst in CH CN:CH Cl (1:1)
3 2 2
(China) Co., Ltd., West Huaihai Road, Shanghai, China). The UV–Vis spectrum
was recorded on a PE L-17 spectrometer (PerkinElmer (China), Inc., Chaoyang
District, Beijing, China). All the melting points were measured using an
Electrothermal 9100 Melting Point apparatus (Tianjin Reliant Instrument
Co., Ltd., Hexi District, Tianjin, China).
solvent, the conversion of b-substituent naphthalenes was less
than 5% even after stirring the reaction mixture for 24 h at
ambient temperature. However, with the use of F20TPPMnCl as
catalyst, the highest conversion of b-substituent naphthalenes
reached 86.20% (Table 1), which indicated that F20TPPMnCl
played an important role in the hydroxylation of b-substituent
naphthalenes.
Typical procedure of b-substituted naphthalene hydroxylation
A solution of 0.36 mmol m-CPBA in 1 mL CH
added dropwise to a solution consisting of 0.3 mmol b-substituted
naphthalene and 0.3 mmol F20TPPMnCl in 1 mL CH CN:CH Cl (1:1)
3 2 2
CN:CH Cl (1:1) solvent was
From Table 1, the oxidation system with F TPPMnCl as
catalyst, m-CPBA as oxidant, and CH CN:CH Cl (1:1) as aprotic
3 2 2
20
3
2
2
solvent at ambient temperature. After 1 h, the reaction mixture was
analyzed by GC–MS SIM program using nitrobenzene as internal standard.
In the blank experiment, the procedure was the same as the procedure
described previously without the adding of the catalyst of F20TPPMnCl.
The products were isolated by column chromatography and identified by
GC–MS spectra and confirmed with their authentic samples firstly. Then,
the position of hydroxyl groups was distinguished using their melting points
according to the adequate differences of the melting points of all kinds of
solvent could transform a variety of b-substituted naphthalenes
to b-substituted naphthols with high regioselectivity. And it
was shown that the hydroxylation of the aromatic C–H bond
on b-substituted naphthalene preferred at the substituted
aromatic ring (2 + 4) with more than 80% selectivity rather than
the non-substituted one of the naphthalene ring even when
the substituent was electron-withdrawing. Further, the hydroxyl-
ation preferred at the 1a position (2) with more than 80%
selectivity with the electron-donating substituent and at the 4a
position (4) with more than 60% selectivity with the electron-
withdrawing substituent in the substituted aromatic ring of
b-substituted naphthalene. In addition, the quinonic products
were in negligible yields detected by GC–MS spectra, so the reac-
tion could be served as a model for studying the regioselective
hydroxylation of the aromatic C–H bond on naphthalene ring.
[28]
naphthols, and the results were compared with literature reports
:
ꢀ
ꢀ
+
1
2
2
2
2
-naphthol: mp ( C): 94.5 (lit.; 94–96), GC/MS (m/z) 144(M );
+
-naphthol: mp ( C): 121 (lit.; 120–122), GC/MS (m/z) 144(M );
-methyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 62.5 (lit.; 64–66), GC/MS (m/z) 158(M );
-ethyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 68.5 (lit.; 68–70), GC/MS (m/z) 172(M );
-isopropyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 47.5 (lit.; 45–50), GC/MS (m/z) 186
M ); 2-methoxy-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 58 (lit.; 56–61), GC/MS (m/z) 174
M ); 2-bromo-4-naphthol: mp ( C): 61 (lit.; 60–63), GC/MS (m/z) 222(M );
-bromo-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 45 (lit.; 44–46), GC/MS (m/z) 222(M );
-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid: mp ( C): 221 (lit.; 220–225), GC/MS (m/z)
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
(
(
+
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
+
2
4
1
7
7
7
ꢀ
+
Bulky interaction of substituent with phenyl groups on
metalloporphyrin
88(M ).
ꢀ
+
-methyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 83.5 (lit.; 80–84), GC/MS (m/z) 158(M );
-ethyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 53 (lit.; 53–57), GC/MS (m/z) 172(M );
-isopropyl-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 83.5 (lit.; 83–84), GC/MS (m/z) 186
M ); 7-methoxy-1-naphthol: mp ( C): 106 (lit.; 105–111), GC/MS (m/z) 174(M ).
ꢀ
+
To explain the phenomenon that the aromatic C–H bond
hydroxylation preferred at the substituted aromatic ring
ꢀ
ꢀ
+
+
(
(2 + 4), we first studied the metalloporphyrin intermediate using
b-methyl-naphthalene as model substrate (Fig. 1).
Competitive kinetic method
From Fig. 1, the lmax band of the reaction mixture decreased
from 470 to 410 nm when m-CPBA was added to the
solution of F20TPPMnCl and then changed back to 470 nm when
b-methyl-naphthalene was added further. Because the lmax
The relative rate of b-substituted naphthalene was studied using
cyclohexene as reference substrate and determined by the decreasing
of cyclohexene concentration when b-substituted naphthalene was
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/poc
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. (2012)