D.P. Dubal et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509 (2011) 10050–10054
10051
Ι
Δ- Stainless steel
ΙΙ
2
0
Δ
Δ
MnO2
-2
-4
-6
TX:MnO2
(b)
(a)
ΙΙΙ
1500
1000
500
0
-500
-1000 -1500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100
Voltage (mV/SCE)
2θ (Degree)
Fig. 1. Cyclic voltammograms for MnO2 and TX:MnO2 in the range of +1.3 to
Fig. 2. The XRD patterns of (a) MnO2 and (b) TX:MnO2 thin films onto SS substrate.
−1.2 V/SCE at the scan rate of 20 mV s−1
.
peak (III) (+1.0 V/SCE) which corresponds to the oxidation and
dissolution of deposit into ions. The standard potentials are shown
in bracket which is nearly the same. The slight variation in standard
and observed potential is seen which may be due to substrate effect.
The higher potential and alkaline medium assist the formation of
MnO2. As the adsorption of Mn2+ ions at the electrode surface pre-
cedes the electron-transfer process, it is inferred that Triton X-100
molecules favor this process, which results in higher anodic peak
current for the oxidation of Mn2+ to MnO2.
surfactant (Triton X100) on structural, morphological, contact angle
and supercapacitive properties of MnO2 thin films are investigated.
2. Experimental details
Plating baths for MnO2 and Triton X-100 assisted MnO2 (TX:MnO2) thin films
were prepared with AR grade chemicals using double distilled water. The bath con-
sisted of an aqueous solution of 0.1 M manganese sulphate (MnSO4·4H2O) with 0.1 M
citric acid {C (OH) (COOH) (CH2COOH)2·H2O} as a complexing agent, maintained at
a pH of ∼10.5 through the addition of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. The
concentration of organic surfactant (Triton X-100) was kept constant at 1 wt% in the
final solution. The MnO2 and TX-MnO2 films are deposited onto a commercially pure
stainless steel (SS) foil (SS 304) by potentiodynamic deposition. Before deposition, SS
foil was polished with zero grade polish paper and then ultrasonically cleaned with
double distilled water. Pure graphite was used as an anode. All deposition poten-
tials were measured with respect to saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as a reference
electrode. The depositions of MnO2 and TX:MnO2 were carried out potentiodynam-
ically between the potential limits of +1.3 and −1.2 V/SCE at 20 mV s−1 scan rate
using Potentiostat (EG and G-263A).
Film crystallinity was analyzed using X-ray diffraction. The XRD
patterns of MnO2 and TX:MnO2 on to the SS substrate are shown
in Fig. 2. Both the XRD patterns do not show well-defined diffrac-
tion peaks other than SS substrate, indicating that MnO2 films are
amorphous. Thus, the data suggest that both samples are amor-
phous and Triton X-100 do not alter the amorphous nature of MnO2.
The obtained amorphous phase is feasible for supercapacitor appli-
cation, since the protons can easily permeate through the bulk of
the amorphous MnO2 electrode materials and whole amount of
electrode is utilized for energy storage [14].
The structural characterization of the MnO2 and TX:MnO2 films was carried out
using X-ray diffraction within the range 10–100◦ on computer controlled Philips
˚
PW-3710 using CrK␣ radiations (ꢀ = 2.2897 A). The surface morphological studies of
films were carried out using FESEM (field emission scanning electron microscopy,
Model: JSM-6701F, JEOL, Japan). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of
the samples were collected using a ‘Perkin Elmer, FTIR Spectrum one’ unit. In order
to study interaction between electrolyte and electrode surface contact angle mea-
surement was carried out by Rame-hart USA equipment with CCD camera. The
supercapacitor study was carried out using the 263A EG & G Princeton Applied
Research Potentiostat forming an electrochemical cell comprising MnO2/TX:MnO2
film as a working electrode, platinum as a counter electrode and saturated calomel
electrode (SCE) as a reference electrode in 1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. Charge-discharge
and impedance study was carried out using CHI 660D electrochemical workstation.
3.3. Surface morphological studies
Many investigations have shown that rechargeability, current
efficiency and stability depend significantly on the electrode
crystal growth in association with a promotion of nucleation and
current distribution [13]. In this regard, the structure of products is
interactions [15]. The SEM images of MnO2 and TX:MnO2 are
shown in Fig. 3(a and b), respectively. The morphologies showed
that the substrate is well covered with MnO2 nanoparticles. From
the Fig. 3(a), one can see the spherical grain morphology of MnO2
spread over whole surface with porous structure. It is seen that
the surface of TX:MnO2 appears more uniform, rough, and porous,
with smaller particles, suggesting a higher surface area than the
smoother surface of MnO2. Devaraj and Munichandraiah [16]
prepared Triton X-100 assisted MnO2 thin films and reported
that due to addition of triton X-100 the surface of MnO2 becomes
porous and rough
3.1. Electrochemical deposition
Fig. 1 shows the typical cyclic voltammograms (CV) for MnO2
and TX:MnO2 in the range of +1.3 to −1.2 V/SCE at the scan rate of
20 mV s−1. The cathodic peak (I) formed at −0.42 V/SCE may be due
to the reduction of manganese at the surface of SS substrate. Depo-
sition potential shifted toward negative region due to the strong
complex formation in the solution.
2M(OH)2+ + 2e− → 2MnOOH + H2↑ (Peak I)
(−0.48 V/SCE)
(1)
2MnOOH + 2e− → 2MnO2 + H2↑ (Peak II)
(−1.25 V/SCE) (2)
+
Since, the bath is alkaline and complexed, the Mn(OH)2 ions
are formed which get attracted toward cathode at higher poten-
tials than −1.1 V/SCE (Peak II) and reduction takes place by the
formation of MnO2. It is seen that, in reverse scan, there is a
3.4. FTIR studies
The FTIR absorption spectra of MnO2 and TX:MnO2 samples
in the range 4000–400 cm−1 are shown in Fig. 4(a and b). The