1
24
S. Alamolhoda et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 638 (2015) 121–126
8
6-2267 for NiFe
plane reflection at 37.44° is strong in the standard JCPDS 001-
239 for NiO phase. The observed peak in the XRD pattern of sam-
ple C0 is not as weak as the (222) reflection in the standard JCPDS
6-2267 card. So presence of some amount of NiO phase in the
2
O
4
phase is weak. While the intensity of (111)
themselves throughout the sol uniformly [38] which provides a
narrow size distribution in the combustion product.
The complexes are assembled within the template of surfactant
micelle in the sol [37] which restricts the amount of coagulation
and therefore restricts the growth of particulate assemblies. The
small particulate assemblies in the sol form smaller particles after
combustion process.
Mean crystallite size of nickel ferrite in the samples with differ-
ent CTAB amounts is calculated using XRD patterns and Scherrer’s
equation:
1
8
sample may be the reason for differences in peak intensities.
Fig. 3 shows the Raman spectra of the samples. It could be seen
that there are Raman bands at about 212, 331, 482, 572 and a
ꢂ1
strong band at about 700 cm which respectively correspond to
g g 2 4
F2g(1), E , F2g(2), F2g(3) and A vibration modes for NiFe O [29–32].
The shoulder like feature at lower wave number side of the
ꢂ1
D ¼ 0:9k=b cos h
ð1Þ
Raman band at 700 cm is assigned to A1g(1) and A1g(2) modes
reflecting the stretching vibration of Fe3 and O ions in tetrahe-
+
2ꢂ
where D is mean crystallite size, k is the X-ray wavelength, b is the
value of the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peaks, and
h is the diffraction angle at the peak maxima [39]. The results
dral site [30].
It was reported that NiO has Raman bands at 440, 560 and
ꢂ1
ꢂ1
7
40 cm [33]. The observed bands at 440 and 562 cm in the
(Table 3) represent a decreasing trend in mean crystallite size by
Raman spectra of the sample C0 can be attributed to the presence
of NiO in this sample since the other bands of NiO have overlapped
increasing CTAB amount for nickel ferrite particles.
Magnetization curves of the samples obtained from room tem-
ꢂ1
with the broad bands of NiFeO
4
at 700 cm . Raman bands for
perature VSM measurement are shown in Fig. 6. Mmax and
quantities of the samples are listed in Table 4 and plotted in Fig. 7.
The reported M values for nanoparticles of NiFe are equal to
i c
H
ꢂ1
maghemite are reported to be at 365, 500 and 700 cm [34,35].
The peaks at 500 and 700 cm are overlap with NiFe
ꢂ1
2
O
4
broad
s
2 4
O
ꢂ1
peaks. However there is a small peak at about 370 cm at the
Raman spectra of the sample C9 which could be the Raman band
of maghemite. As it was explained earlier, it is expected that with
increasing F/O ratio the amount of maghemite phase increases.
Quantitative analyses performed by Rietveld method using
MAUD software representing the dependence of weight percentage
of different phases on CTAB amount are shown in Fig. 4. It should
5
0.4 [16] and 46.53 emu/g [4] and the reported value for the bulk
Table 3
Calculated mean crystallite sizes of the samples with different
CTAB amounts by Scherrer equation.
Sample code
Mean crystallite size (nm)
be noted that these quantities are not exact; particularly since
c
-
C0
C1.5
C3
C6
C9
46
38
33
31
27
Fe peaks in the XRD pattern overlap with NiFe peaks; how-
2
O
3
2
O
4
ever they can represent relative phase changes by alternation in
CTAB amount. It could be observed that with CTAB addition the
amount of NiFe
Fe amount could reduce about 20% at the same time.
However as mentioned above, these changes may be as a result
of formation of some -Fe phase in the sample.
2 4
O would increase above 25% and residual a-
2 3
O
c
2 3
O
Quantitative analyses also show the presence of NiO phase in
the samples. This enhances the probability of presence of NiO in
the synthesized samples and it is in consistence with the above
mentioned XRD standard cards in Fig. 2. The graph in Fig. 4d shows
about 6–9% reduction in NiO amount by CTAB addition. The
amount of NiO phase reaches to minimum in sample C3 and
FeNi
3
phase amount reaches to a maximum in this sample
(Fig. 4b and d). Fig. 4b shows that with CTAB addition FeNi
3
amount reaches to a maximum and then its amount would be
decreased. F/O ratio is increased with surfactant addition and
therefore it is expected to make the environment more reductive
so FeNi
3
phase amount would be increased. After the increment
amount. This declining trend
there is a declining trend for FeNi
3
may be as a result of the higher exothermicity of the combustion
process caused by surfactant addition [36]. The higher exothermic-
ity of the combustion process may facilitate the interaction of the
precursors by oxygen molecules present in the atmosphere.
Therefore it is observed that NiO amount in the samples increases
simultaneously with the decrease in FeNi
FESEM micrographs of the samples C0 and C3 (Fig. 5) represent
morphology of NiFe nano sized particles and it seems that CTAB
3
amount.
Fig. 6. Magnetization curves of the samples.
2 4
O
addition does not affect the particle morphology. The micrographs
represent formation of smaller particles with a narrow size dis-
tribution with CTAB addition. Presence of CTAB influences the for-
mation process of the particulate assemblies in the sol including
nucleation, growth, coagulation and flocculation [37]. The basic
role for surfactants in the synthesis of nanoparticles arises out of
their ability for compartmentalization. This may reduce the reac-
tion dimensionalities which could facilitate the nucleation process
of the particulate assemblies. Also the reactants distribute
Table 4
Magnetic properties of the combustion products of samples synthesized without and
with different amounts of CTAB addition.
Sample code
Mmax (emu/g)
iHc (Oe)
C0
C1.5
C3
C6
C9
37
48.2
51
30.3
29.4
175.5
163.7
170.7
172
172