1386
G.G. Mohamed, M.A.M. Gad-Elkareem / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 68 (2007) 1382–1387
1/T gives a slope from which E* was calculated and A (Arrhenius
factor) was determined from the intercept. The entropy of acti-
vation (ꢀS*), enthalpy of activation (ꢀH*) and the free energy
change of activation (ꢀG*) were calculated. The calculated val-
ues of E*, A, ꢀS*, ꢀH* and ꢀG* for the decomposition steps are
given in Tables 8S and 9S in supplementary data. According to
the kinetic data obtained from the DTG curves, all the complexes
have a negative entropy, which indicates that the complexes are
formed spontaneously.
Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, respectively, which correspond to
the loss of ligand molecule leaving metal oxide residue.
The TGA data of the metal complexes of HL3 ligand
(Tables 6S and 7S in supplementary data) indicated that the
complexes are thermally decomposed in three to four steps. The
first decomposition step represent the loss of coordinated water,
HCl and O2 gases in the Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes only.
While the first decomposition step in Cu(II) and Zn(II) com-
plexes correspond to the loss of coordinated water molecules
within the temperature range 40.0–250 ◦C. The energy of acti-
vation of this step is 43.65, 23.95, 46.87 and 64.10 kJ mol−1
for Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, respectively.
The remaining steps found in the temperature range 280–750
with an estimated weight loss of 56.95% (calcd. 56.09%) and
56.35% (calcd. 56.09%) and activation energy of 122.4 and
72.47 kJ mol−1 for Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes, respectively, is
due to the decomposition of HL3 molecule leaving metal oxide
residues (CoO and NiO). The last steps occur within the tem-
perature range 100–900 ◦C with an estimated mass loss 73.21%
(calcd. 72.91%) and 78.28 (calcd. 77.98%) for Cu(II) and Zn(II)
complexes, respectively, which are reasonably accounted for the
liberationHCl, CH4, CO2 andligandmoleculeleavingCu2Oand
ZnO residues. The energy of activation of this step is 89.67 and
118.3 kJ mol−1 for Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, respectively.
The metal complexes of HL4 ligand are thermally decom-
posed in three to four successive decomposition steps. The
first two steps with an estimated mass loss of 22.85–29.09%
(calcd. 23.60–28.13%) within the temperature range 30–290 ◦C
can be attributed to the liberation of hydrated water, HCl, O2,
H2, CH4 and CO2 gases. The energy of activation of this step
is 50.22, 42.33, 65.25 and 41.98 kJ mol−1 for Co(II), Ni(II),
Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, respectively. The remaining steps
found within the temperature range 250–900 ◦C with an esti-
mated weight loss of 56.93% (calcd. 56.58%), 56.85% (calcd.
56.58%), 57.83% (calcd. 57.26%) and 51.69% (calcd. 52.13%)
and activation energy of 117.6, 95.98, 155.3 and 115.6 kJ mol−1
for Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes, respectively,
is attributed to the removal of ligand molecule leaving MO as
metallic residue.
3.7. Structural interpretation
The structural information from these complexes is in
agreement with the data reported in this paper based on the
elemental and thermal analyses, IR and solid reflectance spec-
tra, molar conductance, and magnetic moment measurements.
Consequently, the structures proposed are based on octahedral,
tetrahedral and square planar geometric structures. The azo lig-
ands coordinate via the azo N, carbonyl O, enolic sulfonamide
OH and pyrazole or thiodiaza N groups forming two binding
chelating sites. According to the above data, the structures of
the complexes are shown in Figs. 1S–3S in supplementary data.
Supplemental information
Tables 1S and 2S contains the analytical and physical data
of the complexes. Table 3S contains the 1H NMR spectra
of the ligands while Tables 4S and 5S contain the IR data.
Tables 6S and 7S contain the TGA results while Tables 8S and 9S
have the kinetic data. Figs. 1S–3S contain the structures of the
isolated solid complexes.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References
[1] Y. Funahashi, N.H. Sugi, T. Semba, Y. Yamamoto, S. Hamaoka, N.
Tsukahara-Tamai, Y. Ozawa, A. Tsuruoka, K. nara, K. Takahashi, T. okabe,
J. Kamata, T. Owa, N. ueda, T. Haneda, M. Yonaga, K. Yoshimatsu, T.
Wakabayashi, Cancer Res. 62 (2002) 6116.
[2] T. Semba, Y. Funahashi, N. Ono, Y. Yamamoto, N.H. Sugi, M. Asada, K.
Yoshimatsu, T. Wakabayashi, Clin. Cancer Res. 10 (2004) 1430.
[3] J. Sławin´ski, M. Gdaniec, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 40 (2005) 377.
[4] Q. Chen, P.N.P. Rao, E.E. Knaus, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13 (2005) 2459.
[5] A.K. Gadad, M.N. Noolyi, R.V. Karpoormath, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12
(2004) 5651.
[6] V.K. Agrawal, S. Bano, C.T. Supuran, P.V. Khadikar, Eur. J. Med. Chem.
39 (2004) 593.
[7] C.M. Yeung, L.L. Klein, C.A. Flentge, J.T. Randolph, C. Zhao, M. Sun,
T. Dekhtyar, V.S. Stoll, D.j. Kempf, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005)
2275.
3.6. Kinetic analysis
processes of dehydrated complexes namely activation energy
(E*), enthalpy (ꢀH*), entropy (ꢀS*) and Gibbs free energy
change of the decomposition (ꢀG*) were evaluated graphically
by employing the Coats–Redfern relation [29]:
ꢀ
ꢁ
2RT
E∗
log{Wf/(Wf − W)}
log
T2
ꢀ
ꢂ
ꢃꢁ
AR
θE∗
E∗
= log
1 −
−
(1)
2.303RT
[8] I. Enc´ıo, Dj. Morre´, R. Villar, Mj. Gil, V. Mart´ınez-Merino, Br. J. Cancer
92 (2005) 690.
[9] M.J. Nieta, F.L. Alovero, R.H. Manzo, M.R. Mazzieri, Eur. J. Med. Chem.
40 (2005) 361.
[10] J.N. Dom´ınguez, C. Leo´n, J. Rodrigues, N.G. de Dom´ınguez, J. Gut, P.J.
Rosethal, Il Farmaco 60 (2005) 307.
where Wf is the mass loss at the completion of the reaction,
W the mass loss up to temperature T, R the gas constant,
E* the activation energy in kJ mol−1, θ the heating rate and
*
∼
(1 − (2RT/E )) 1. A plot of the left-hand side of Eq. (1) against
=