S.K. Padhi / Thermochimica Acta 448 (2006) 1–6
5
sponds to the nth order reaction with auto catalysis [f(α) in Cn
n
is (1 − α) (1 + Kcatα)] through the reactants having Fexp, F
crit
1
.00 and 1.10, respectively. The function f(α) in Bna and Cn are
2
.08 1.0236E−3
2.07
(1 − α)
α
and (1 − α) (1 + 0.0144α), respectively.
Three-dimensional Jander’s diffusion model (D3), the activa-
tion energy slightly deviates than the other mentioned models
in Table 3, which is very difficult to predict with the similar
changes of α with respect to both time and temperature.
3.2.3. Determination of half-life period and rate constant
Based on the predictions of Fn model, reaction was consid-
◦
ered for 25–600 C. DSC curves calculated within the range of
temperature for the decomposition process, this generates the
change in concentration of reaction progress. These curves with
degree of conversion as a parameter indicates an exponential
progress in percentage of conversion with time and tempera-
ture. For clarification, thermoanalytical isothermal predictions
Fig. 8. ASTM plot of [Ni(ampy)2(NO3)2].
perature. The logarithms of heating rates were plotted over the
maximum reciprocal temperatures of DSC curves, where the
obtained slope gives the activation energy. The pre-exponential
factor was obtained on the assumption of a first-order reaction
◦
are investigated in a narrow temperature range 271–320 C. The
◦
conversion shows a maximum at 320 C. Both the results were
taken into account where, the 50% of concentrations changes
2
A = βE/RT exp (E/RTj,m). Tj,m was determined utilizing
◦
j,m
the smoothed numerical derivatives of dα/dT. The ASTM anal-
at 4.85 min, at about 315 C. Iso-concentration plot dynamic
reactants reveal a sigmoidal increase in product concentration
to attain a saturation limit at 18.6 min. Rate constant was cal-
culated from the first-order kinetic equation, k = 0.693/t1/2. The
ysis plot (Fig. 8) of [Ni(ampy)2(NO3)2] shows the activation
−
1
energy of the complex is 46 ± 2 kJ mol and the correspond-
−
1
ing average logarithmic pre-exponential factor (log A (s )) is
calculatedrateconstantandhalf-lifetimefromiso-concentration
3
.44.
−3 −1
and 291 s, respectively.
plot are 2.381 × 10
s
3
.2.2. Determination of kinetic model of thermal
4. Conclusion
decomposition
Multivariate non-linear-regression (Netzsch TA4 thermoki-
netics) was applied to determine the most probable kinetic
model. The software module Netzsch TA4 thermokinetics
numerically solves the relevant differential equations and the
parametersofthedifferentialequationsareiterativelyoptimized.
Here all the commonly used models were utilized for the deter-
mination of activation energy [17–19]. Combination of both
iso-conversional and multivariate non-linear-regression can pro-
vide most reasonable models than the model-fitting methods.
The mentioned models listed in Table 3 are based on correlation
coefficient and the “goodness of fit” from a statistical point of
view, simulates to a first-order reaction path A → B. The best
model imaged from the correlation coefficient is Bna which
Solid-state kinetics of monoclinic [Ni(ampy)2(NO3)2] com-
plex for thermal release of pyridine, was investigated through
both iso-conversional and multivariate non-linear-regression
methods. The thermal behavior of [Ni(ampy)2(NO3)2] shows
thermal decomposition in three steps with the removal of ligand
in an exothermic process. The microscopic surface morphology
◦
shows a thread like fiber of NiO calcined at 600 C. Thermoki-
netics plays an important role in this magnetically impulsive
compound providing the scheme of kinetic process with itera-
tions. The kinetics of elimination of pyridine can be described
with a generalized expanded Prout–Tompkins equation. The
considerable improvement of the fit quality of DSC data was
achieved by single step kinetic model. At the best of our knowl-
edge, the novelty of this work provides the determination of
half-life period based on first-order kinetics. The multifarious-
ness application of thermokinetics can be used as a device to
n
corresponds to expanded Prout–Tompkins equation (1 − α)
a
α having Fexp, F 1.00 and 1.09, respectively. Next to this
crit
model the others like Fn, Cn and F2 fit better. Cn, which corre-
Table 3
Arrhenius parameters in multivariate non-linear-regression methods
E (kJ mol 1)
−
log A (s
−1
)
Correlation coefficient
n or a or log Kcat
Fexp
Fcrit (0.95)
Model
Bna
An
Cn
D2
D3
D4
F2
42.23 ± 0.03
41.71 ± 0.96
42.17 ± 0.03
41.82 ± 0.73
47.69 ± 0.68
43.69 ± 0.73
41.12 ± 0.04
42.43 ± 0.03
3.12 ± 0.003
2.73 ± 0.12
3.11 ± 0.01
2.12 ± 0.09
2.36 ± 0.08
1.75 ± 0.09
2.95 ± 0.01
3.14 ± 0.004
0.999998
0.997951
0.999998
0.993862
0.996045
0.994710
0.999983
0.999998
1.0236E−3 (n = 2.08)
n = 0.6582
−1.8412 (n = 2.07)
1.00
180.5
1.00
289.4
207.3
247.6
1.09
1.09
1.10
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
8.58
1.18
Fn
n = 2.0883