Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
P. Mallick et al. / Solid State Communications 150 (2010) 1342–1345
1345
different sizes (with volume V2) as seen in our TEM data. Fig. 4
shows a good correlation of the distribution of TB obtained from the
ZFC data and that calculated from the TEM data. Our observation of
larger TB for 3 at.% than that of 5 at.% Mn doped NiO is in accordance
with the characteristic behaviour of superparamagnetic system,
since the crystallite size for 5 at.% Mn doped NiO samples is less
than that of 3 at.% Mn doped NiO.
21 nm for 5 at.% Mn doping in NiO. The antiferromagnetic proper-
ties of NiO is retained up to 1 at.% Mn doping. Increasing Mn doping
concentration to 3 and 5 at.% in NiO led to superparamagnetic be-
haviour. The distribution of blocking temperature of the Mn doped
NiO particles matches well with the distribution of particle size as
obtained from TEM. The observed antiferro to superparamagnetic
transition on Mn doping in NiO is understood on the basis of Mn
occupying Ni site and breaking the translational symmetry of the
parent antiferromagnetic correlation.
The observed magnetic behaviour of Mn doped NiO nanoparti-
cles can have contribution from the magnetization resulting from
(i) the finite size effect arising due to the reduced coordination of
the surface spins of NiO nanoparticles, (ii) the secondary Mn re-
lated impurity phases and (iii) the Mn2+ ions occupying the Ni. We
examine the occurrence of these possibilities in our samples.
NiO nanoparticles are shown to exhibit finite size effect, where
8-, 6-, or 4-sublattice spin configurations arise due to the reduced
coordination of surface spins, leading to anomalous magnetic
properties like large moments and coercivity, and loop shifts [28].
In some cases, finite size effect leads to ferromagnetism [29]
(for particles of size, D ≤ 24 nm), superparamagnetism (D ≤
31.5 nm) [28], spin glass behaviour (D ≤ 10 nm) [31] and even
core–shell like structure (4 ≤ D ≤ 22 nm) [36], where the core of
NiO nanoparticle behaves like a ferrimagnet and the shell contains
randomly oriented spins with low coordination. Thus depending
upon the particle size, different anomalous magnetic properties
emerge at the expense of antiferromagnetic property of the host
NiO. In our case, the crystallite size remained almost invariant with
Mn doping. The magnetic behaviour however showed a dramatic
modification with Mn concentration. These results indicate that
more than the finite size effect, the Mn content dictates the
magnetic property of NiO.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. P.V. Satyam, IOP, Bhubaneswar for providing
TEM facility. We acknowledge the UGC-DAE CSR, Indore for
providing magnetic measurement facility. DST Govt. of India is
acknowledged for providing PPMS-VSM at UGC-DAE, CSR, Indore
by which magnetic measurements were carried out.
References
[1] I. Zutic, J. Fabian, S. Das Sarma, Rev. Modern Phys. 76 (2004) 323.
[2] T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, D. Ferrand, Science 287 (2000) 1019.
[3] K. Sato, H. Katayama-Yoshida, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17 (2002) 367.
[4] A. Tiwari, C. Jin, A. Kvit, D. Kumar, J.F. Muth, J. Narayan, Solid State Commun.
121 (2002) 371.
[5] M.D. Mukadam, S.M. Yusuf, Physica B 403 (2008) 2602.
[6] C. Rath, P. Mallick, D. Pandey, D. Sa, A. Banerjee, N.C. Mishra, J. Phys.: Condens.
Matter 21 (2009) 075801.
[7] S.J. Pearton, W.H. Heo, M. Ivill, D.P. Norton, T. Steiner, Semicond. Sci. Technol.
19 (2004) R59.
[8] D.C. Kundaliya, S.B. Ogale, S.E. Lofland, S. Dhar, C.J. Metting, S.R. Shinde,
Z. Ma, B. Varughese, K.V. Ramanujachary, L. Salamanca-Riba, T. Venkatesan,
Nat. Mater. 3 (2004) 709.
[9] J.D. Bryan, S.A. Santangelo, S.C. Keveren, D.R. Gamelin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127
(2005) 15568.
[10] A.P. Douvalis, L. Jankovic, T. Bakas, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 436203.
[11] J.H. He, S.L. Yuan, Y.S. Yin, Z.M. Tian, P. Li, Y.Q. Wang, K.L. Liu, C.H. Wang, J. Appl.
Phys. 103 (2008) 023906.
[12] S. Ogale, D. Kundaliya, S. Mehraeen, L.-F. Fu, S. Zhang, A. Lussier, J. Dvorak,
N. Browning, Y. Idzerda, T. Venkatesan, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) 1344.
[13] K. Potzger, S. Zhou, Phys. Status Solidi (b) 246 (2009) 1147.
[14] S.A. Ahmed, Cryst. Res. Technol. 44 (2009) 971.
The similar ionic radius of Ni2+ (0.69 Å) and Mn2+ (0.66 Å)
and their preferred chemical coordination being same (octahe-
dral) [37], the Mn2+ is expect to occupy Ni2+ site in the NiO matrix.
Absence of signature of any secondary phase up to 5 at.% Mn doped
NiO in the XRD spectra plotted in log scale (Fig. 1(b)), thus indicates
that Mn occupies Ni site in NiO matrix. We now consider the effect
of Mn occupying Ni site on the magnetic properties of Mn doped
NiO.
Though the exact mechanism of observed magnetic behaviour
in this system is still not clear, the physical origin of superpara-
magnetism in Mn doped NiO samples beyond 3 at.% Mn can be
understood as follows. The antiferromagnetic structure of NiO is
determined by dominating super-exchange interactions in linear
Ni–O–Ni atomic chains with opposite spins along [111] direc-
tion [38]. This translational symmetry of NiO is broken on dop-
ing with Mn, which randomly occupies Ni sites [39]. This leads to
the formation of Ni–O–Ni–O–Mn–O–Ni–O–Ni quasi-paramagnetic
coupling [40] with a net magnetization per particle in the back-
ground of the antiferromagnetic correlation of the host NiO. The
superparamagnetic response arising from the broken antiferro-
magnetic symmetry of NiO shows up at low fields and the anti-
ferromagnetic response of the host NiO dominates at high fields.
We thus observe a rapid increase of magnetization at low fields
followed by unsaturation of the same at high fields in the M–H
curve (Fig. 3). For Mn doping below 3 at.%, the formation of quasi-
paramagnetic coupling is too small and its contribution is masked
due to the dominating contribution of the antiferromagnetic
ordering [10].
[15] Z. Lu, H.-S. Hsu, Y. Tzeng, J.-C.-A. Huang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 152507.
[16] Z.H. Zhang, X. Wang, J.B. Xu, S. Muller, C. Ronning, Q. Li, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4
(2009) 523.
[17] A. Tiwari, V.M. Bhosle, S. Ramachandran, N. Sudhakar, J. Narayan, S. Budak,
A. Gupta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 142511.
[18] H. Sato, T. Minami, S. Takata, T. Yamada, Thin Solid Films 236 (1993) 27.
[19] U.S. Joshi, Y. Matsumoto, K. Itaka, M. Sumiya, H. Koinuma, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252
(2006) 2524.
[20] J. Wu, C.-W. Nan, Y. Lin, Y. Deng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 217601.
[21] O. Bidault, M. Maglione, M. Actis, M. Kchikech, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 4191.
[22] F.J. Morin, Phys. Rev. 93 (1953) 1199.
[23] S. Lany, J. Osorio-Guillén, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 241203(R).
[24] Y.-H. Lin, J. Wang, J. Cai, M. Ying, R. Zhao, M. Li, C.-W. Nan, Phys. Rev. B 73
(2006) 193308.
[25] J. Wang, J. Cai, Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Nan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 202501.
[26] J. Nowotny, M. Rekas, Solid State Ion. 12 (1984) 253.
[27] P.D. Battle, A.K. Cheetham, G.A. Gehring, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) 7578.
[28] R.H. Kodama, S.A. Makhlouf, A.E. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 1393.
[29] L. Li, L. Chen, R. Qihe, G. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 134102.
[30] K. Lord, T.M. Williams, D. Hunter, K. Zhang, J. Dadson, A.K. Pradhan, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 88 (2006) 262105.
[31] S.D. Tiwari, K.P. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 104433.
[32] T. Bitoh, K. Ohba, M. Takamatsu, T. Shirane, S. Chikazawa, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 64
(1995) 1305.
[33] J. Jeong, S. Lee, J. Kim, S. Shin, Phys. Status Solidi (b) 241 (2004) 1593.
[34] S.A. Makhlouf, F.T. Parker, F.E. Spada, A.E. Berkowitz, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997)
5561.
[35] P. Mallick, C. Rath, R. Biswal, N.C. Mishra, Indian J. Phys. 83 (2009) 517.
[36] S. Thota, J. Kumar, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 68 (2007) 1951.
[37] W.-L. Lai, L.-Y. Chou, C.-Y. Ting, R. Kirby, Y.-C. Tsai, A.H.-J. Wang, S.-H. Liaw,
J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 13962.
[38] E. Cazzanelli, A. Kuzmin, N. Mironova-Ulmane, G. Mariotto, Phys. Rev. B 71
(2005) 134415, and references therein.
4. Conclusion
The structural and magnetic properties of chemically synthe-
sized Mn doped NiO samples are reported. We show that the struc-
ture and microstructure of NiO is not influenced considerably, but
the magnetic properties undergo a drastic change with Mn dop-
ing. The average crystallite size was found to remain almost con-
stant (28 nm) up to 3 at.% Mn doping beyond which it decreases to
[39] A. Bajpai, A. Banerjee, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 8996.
[40] F. Zhao, H.M. Qiu, L.Q. Pan, H. Zhu, Y.P. Zhang, Z.G. Guo, J.H. Yin, X.D. Zhao, J.Q.
Xiao, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 (2008) 425208.