R.J. Vega-Paulino, M.E. Zúniga-Hansen / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 76 (2012) 44–51
51
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the Project FONDEF
DO7I1045 of Chile and the CREAS. Also, we acknowledge financial
support (scholarship) of CONICYT and PUCV for the PhD student,
R. Vega. We are very grateful by the generous donations of Bio-
catalysts Ltd. (Wales, UK), Amano Enzyme USA Co., Ltd., DSM Food
Specialties Unltd (Santiago, Chile), Dimerco Comercial Ltda (Santi-
ago, Chile) and Blumos SA (Santiago, Chile).
References
[
[
[
1] M. Hirayama, Pure Appl. Chem. 74 (2002) 1271–1279.
2] M. Roberfroid, J. Nutr. 137 (2007) 830S–837S.
3] P.F. Monsan, F. Ouarné, in: D. Charalampopoulos, R.A. Rastall (Eds.), Prebiotics
and Probiotics Science and Technology, Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 293–320.
4] A. Nemukula, T. Mutanda, B.S. Wilhelmi, C.G. Whiteley, Bioresour. Technol. 100
[
[
(
2009) 2040–2045.
5] M.J. Mabel, P.T. Sangeetha, K. Platel, K. Srinivasan, S.G. Prapulla, Carbohydr. Res.
43 (2008) 56–66.
Fig. 9. Thermal inactivation kinetics of fructosyltransferase of Rohapect CM under
non-reactive conditions (᭹, 50 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.5) and reactive
3
[6] B. Andersen, N. Thiesen, P.E. Broe, Acta Chem. Scand. 23 (1969) 2367–2374.
[7] F. Maugeri, S. Hernalsteens, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 49 (2007) 43–49.
[8] P. Chuankhayan, C.Y. Hsleh, Y.C. Huang, Y.Y. Hsleh, H.H. Guan, Y.C. Hsleh, Y.C.
Tlen, C. De Chen, C.M. Chlang, C.J. Chen, J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2010) 23251–23264.
◦
conditions (ꢀ, 600 g/L methyl-␣-d-glucopyranoside in the same buffer) at 50 C and
1
92 UT/mL of incubation medium.
[
9] M. Álvaro-Benito, M. de Abreu, F. Portillo, J. Sanz-Aparicio, M. Fernández-
Lobato, Appl. Environ. Microb. 76 (2010) 7491–7499.
[
10] A. Ballesteros, F.J. Plou, M. Alcalde, M. Ferrer, H. García-Arellano, D. Reyes-
Duarte, I. Ghazi, in: R.N. Patel (Ed.), Biocatalysis in the Pharmaceutical and
3.7. Thermal stability of free enzyme
Biotechnological Industries, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007, pp. 463–488.
For any enzymatic process, long-term stability of the catalyst is
[11] A. Madlová, M. Anto sˇ ová, M. Baráthová, M. Polakovi cˇ , V.
Pap. 53 (1999) 366–369.
[
Sˇ tefuca, V. Bále sˇ , Chem.
a prerequisite for the success of large-scale operation [39]. Ther-
mal inactivation under non-reactive and reactive conditions of free
12] R.C. Fernandez, C.A. Ottoni, E. Sabino, R.M. Saito, J.M. Carter, L.R. Magossi, M.A.
Alves, M.F. De Andrade, B. Guilarte, A.E. Maiorano, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
75 (2007) 87–93.
13] L.E. Trujillo, J.G. Arrieta, F. Dafhnis, J. García, J. Valdés, Y. Tambara, M. Pérez, L.
Hernández, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 28 (2001) 139–144.
14] A. Zuccaro, S. Götze, S. Kneip, P. Dersch, J. Seibel, ChemBioChem 9 (2008)
143–149.
15] H. Taniguchi, in: C.T. Hou (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Biocatalysis, CRC Press,
Boca Raton, 2005, pp. 20-1–20-25.
16] J.W. Yun, S.K. Song, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 1 (1996) 18–21.
◦
enzyme (Rohapect CM) at 50 C is presented in Fig. 9. Reactive
[
[
[
[
conditions were mimicked by replacing sucrose with methyl-␣-
d-glucopyranoside. Results clearly show a stabilizing effect at high
concentrations of methyl-␣-d-glucopyranoside on enzyme activity
after a 60 h incubation time. In contrast, inactivation rate was faster
in buffer solution in which the half-life was approximately 10.2 h.
Similar behavior has been reported for Pectinex Ultra SP-L at the
same concentration of this glycoside during incubation [21]. With
these results, it is not surprising that high concentrations of sucrose
and sc-FOS may cause a protective effect in the same extent as that
exerted by methyl-␣-d-glucopyranoside on the transfructosylation
activity due to the fact that sucrose has been recognized as one of
the key stabilizers of proteins [39–41].
[17] Z. Onderková, J. Bryjak, M. Polakovi cˇ , Chem. Pap. 61 (2007) 359–363.
[
18] E. Aguiar-Oliveira, F. Maugeri, Int. J. Food Eng. 6 (2010), doi:10.2202/1556-
758.1894(article 9).
19] J.W. Yun, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 19 (1996) 107–117.
[20] Y.D. Hang, E.E. Woodams, Biotechnol. Lett. 17 (1995) 741–744.
[21] I. Ghazi, L. Fernandez-Arrojo, H. Garcia-Arellano, M. Ferrer, A. Ballesteros, F.J.
Plou, J. Biotechnol. 128 (2007) 204–211.
3
[
[
22] L. Cantarella, F. Alfani, M. Cantarella, in: J.R. Whitaker, A.G.J. Voragen, D.W.S.
Wong (Eds.), Handbook of Food Enzymology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,
2
003, pp. 805–822.
23] A.J. Straathof, A.P. Kieboom, H. van Bekkum, Carbohydr. Res. 146 (1986)
54–159.
24] S. Farine, C. Versluis, P.J. Bonnici, A. Heck, C. L’homme, A. Puigserver, A. Biagini,
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55 (2001) 55–60.
[
[
[
[
1
4
. Conclusions
25] R. Cruz, V.D. Cruz, M.Z. Belini, J.G. Belote, C.R. Vieira, Bioresour. Technol. 65
Three low-cost enzyme preparations were selected from a
(
1998) 139–143.
screening for transfructosylation activity. These preparations and
Pectinex Ultra SP-L exhibited a high ratio (UT/UH), selectivity for
the synthesis of sc-FOS and did not hydrolyze the produced sc-FOS
after a 12 h reaction time. Pectinex Ultra SP-L, Rohapect CM, Vis-
cozyme L and Pectinex Smash could serve as a source of food-grade
fructosyltransferase for the inexpensive and efficient production of
sc-FOS.
Sc-FOS synthesis catalyzed by Rohapect CM was not influenced
by operating variables such as temperature, pH, concentrations of
initial sucrose and enzyme. Yield was not affected by these vari-
ables within the ranges studied, except at the levels of pH 4.5 and
26] Y.D. Hang, E.E. Woodams, Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 29 (1996) 578–580.
[27] A. Tanriseven, Y. Aslan, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 36 (2005) 550–554.
28] I. Ghazi, A. Gómez De Segura, L. Fernández-Arrojo, M. Alcalde, M. Yates, M.L.
Rojas-Cervantes, F.J. Plou, A. Ballesteros, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 35 (2005)
[
19–27.
[29] P.T. Sangeetha, M.N. Ramesh, S.G. Prapulla, J. Food Eng. 68 (2005) 57–64.
[
[
30] O. Sánchez, F. Guio, D. Garcia, E. Silva, L. Caicedo, Food Bioprod. Process 86
2008) 109–115.
31] M.B. Prata, S.I. Mussato, L.R. Rodrigues, J.A. Teixeira, Biotechnol. Lett. 32 (2010)
837–849.
(
[32] S.I. Mussatto, C.N. Aguilar, R.L. Rodrigues, J.A. Teixeira, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym.
9 (2009) 76–81.
5
[
[
33] S.I. Mussatto, J.A. Teixeira, Biochem. Eng. J. 53 (2010) 154–157.
34] J.A.M. van Balken, ThJ.G.M. van Dooren, W.J.J. van den Tweel, J. Kamphuis, E.M.
Meijer, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35 (1991) 216–221.
8
00 g/L sucrose. Operational variables affected the reaction rate
[
35] M. Anto sˇ ová, V. Illeová, M. Vandáková, A. Dru zˇ kovská, M. Polakovi cˇ , J. Biotech-
being reflected in the volumetric productivity, but did not result in
any change in the sc-FOS formation. In addition, Rohapect CM was
nol. 135 (2008) 58–63.
[
36] K.J. Duan, J.S. Chen, D.C. Sheu, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 16 (1994) 334–339.
◦
thermally stable at 50 C when sucrose was replaced by methyl-
-d-glucopyranoside. Volumetric productivity of sc-FOS at initial
[37] K.-I. Iwasaki, M. Nakajima, S.-I. Nakao, Process Biochem. 31 (1996) 69–76.
38] A.E. Cruz-Guerrero, L. Gómez-Ruiz, G. Viniegra-Gónzalez, E. Bárzana, M. García-
Garibay, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 93 (2006) 1123–1129.
[
␣
sucrose concentrations above 700 g/L can be further improved by
response surface methodology. This strategy has been successfully
applied to Rohapect CM and the results will be reported in another
paper.
[
39] A. Madlová, M. Anto sˇ ová, M. Polakovi cˇ , V. Bále sˇ , Chem. Pap. 54 (2000) 339–344.
[40] Z. Onderková, J. Bryjak, K. Vanková, M. Polakovi cˇ , Enzyme Microb. Technol. 47
2010) 134–139.
41] J.C. Lee, S.N. Timasheff, J. Biol. Chem. 256 (1981) 7193–7201.
(
[