10.1002/anie.201810141
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
attack onto one of the ketones. This type of fragmentation has
been reported previously on similar structures, and may be
enhanced by the motif of three adjacent electropositive carbon
atoms.9 The product of this fragmentation, enolate 5, can now
react via different pathways, depending on the conditions. It can
either attack the electrophilic disulfide to enter into the thioether
reaction pathway, or can undergo a self-aldol reaction with the
protonated enolate 4 to yield the observed hydroxyketone product
(2). The reaction with the disulfide, observed under LAG
conditions with the more polar solvents, and also in solution,
yields difluorinated thoiether 3a. Under longer reaction times, or
at higher temperatures, this can fragment further to
difluoromethylthioether 3b.7 In order to probe the validity of the
proposed mechanism, we designed several control experiments
to test the various aspects.
Table 1 Effect of different liquid additives on reaction selectivity.
O
O
HO Ph
S
Ph
F
H
Ph
S
O
O
Ph
Ph
Ph
(1 equiv)
F
F
F
F
F
Ph
Ph
Cs2CO3 (3 equiv)
1 h
2
F
F
4
O
1
F
S
DMSO (x µL)
S
Ph
Ph
F
F
F
[mixer mill]
3a
3b
x (µL)
Entry
Yield 2a
Yield 3aa
Yield 3ba
1
2
3
4
5
0
25
50
100
150
88% (72%b)
0%
16%
0%
32%
0%
0%
0%
10%
12%
19%
22%
62% (56%b)
32%
21%
entries below this line explore the effect of varying LAG and associated dielec. const.
Liquid (50 µL) dielec. const. Yield 2a Yield 3aa Yield 3ba Yield 4a
Entry
Initially, the fragmentation of the difluorinated diketone 1
was investigated (Scheme 2, equations A-D). It was observed that
under the standard reaction conditions (as shown in Table 1, entry
1), benzoic acid could be isolated as a side product in 84% yield
along with the tetrafluoro alcohol (2) (Scheme 2, equation A). This
suggests that the identity of the nucleophile initiating the
fragmentation could be water or carbonate. However, no water
was deliberately added to the reaction, so the only water available
would be present in one of the other reagents. Control
experiments (Scheme 2, equations B-D) revealed that in the
absence of cesium carbonate, no reaction was observed, with
only starting material observed in the crude reaction mixtures. The
-
-
88%
86%
66%
76%
60%
60%
74%
26%
15%
23%
55%
31%
0%
0%
1%
1%
1%
1%
3%
1%
1%
25%
27%
4%
25%
62%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
12%
0%
10%
4%
6%
5%
7%
4%
3%
8%
5%
4%
4%
0%
5%
35%
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
hexane
toluene
EtOAc
THF
1.88
2.38
6.02
7.58
8.93
17.9
24.5
32.2
36.7
37.5
37.8
46.7
80.1
DCM
iPrOH
EtOH
NMP
DMF
MeCN
DMA
DMSO
H2O
18
19
28%
a Yield determined by 19F NMR compared to trifluorotoluene as an internal standard. b Isolated yield.
DMSO (Table 1, Entries 2-5). Beyond 50 μL, none of the
fluorinated alcohol 2 was observed, and the highest yield of 3a
was achieved by milling with 50 μL of DMSO. This is therefore an
example of a reaction where the pathway can be
completely altered by neat milling. Under neat milling conditions,
the disulfide is untouched, whereas use of LAG or solution phase
reaction conditions leads to the consumption of disulfide and
formation of the thioether products 3a and 3b.
2-
requirement for cesium carbonate supports the notion that CO3
acts as the initiating nucleophile, with subsequent
decarboxylation to benzoic acid (as depicted in the proposed
mechanism). The next part of the mechanism explored was the
presence and identity of the proposed intermediate difluoroketone
4 and its corresponding enolate 5 that is common to both reaction
pathways (Scheme 2, equations E & F). Indeed, preparation of
ketone 4 and subjection to both neat grinding and LAG conditions
yielded the expected products, demonstrating its competence in
both reaction pathways and supporting the notion that 4 is an
intermediate in both of these processes.10 Finally, in order to test
whether this process could be under thermodynamic control, the
reversibility of each step was examined (Scheme 2, equations G-
I). It was found that subjecting tetrafluoro alcohol 2 to stirring in
DMSO resulted in no transformation and full recovery of 2
(Scheme 2, equation G). Whereas, stirring alcohol 2 in DMSO
with cesium carbonate (no disulfide), led to the generation of
ketone 4 in 67% NMR yield (Scheme 2, equation H). Under
analogous conditions, but with inclusion of disulfide,
difluoromethylthioether 3b was observed in 84% yield (Scheme 2,
equation I). Reversibility was also observed in the mixer mill under
LAG conditions. On subjecting alcohol 2 to ball milling for one
hour in the presence of phenyl disulfide, cesium carbonate and
DMSO, thioethers 3a and 3b were observed (Scheme 2, equation
K). Whilst these experiments support the proposed mechanism,
they do not provide an explanation to the origin of the observed
chemoselectivity differences. In order to probe this phenomenon
further, different reaction times were investigated under both LAG
and neat conditions, the results are depicted in Scheme 3. Under
extended reaction times in the absence of a liquid additive,
thioether 3a was observed, in stark contrast to the observed
product after 1 hour. However, the formation of 3a appears to be
Having established that liquid assisted grinding has a
significant effect on the outcome of this reaction, it was
hypothesized that the nature of the solvent could lead to different
results. Indeed, it has been observed previously that solvents of
different polarities can be used for LAG to form different
polymorphs of cocrystals.8 We therefore tested a wide range of
solvents, with varying dielectric constants (Table 1, Entries 7-19).
It can be seen that the reactivity can again be switched,
depending on how polar the solvent is. The most polar solvents
tested (ε > 30, entries 14-19) seem to favour the reaction with
disulfide to form thioether 3a (with the exception of acetonitrile
and water). Indeed, in the case of water there appears to be very
little discrimination between the reaction products with the major
component of this reaction being the difluoroketone 4, thus
suggesting that water is not a critical factor in determining the
selectivity. However, the less polar solvents (entries 7-13) appear
to favour the formation of 2. These intriguing observations are, to
the best of our knowledge, unprecedented. While there are
previous examples where the selectivity, rate or products of a
reaction have been changed, switching to a different reaction
pathway using neat and LAG milling has not been previously
reported. It was therefore important to attempt to propose and
understand the mechanism of this process. Our proposed
mechanism is presented in Scheme 2, and commences with the
fragmentation of difluorodiketone 1, likely initiated by nucleophilic
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.