8702
M. J. Chmielewski et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 8699–8703
À
Also there is an unusually small effect of Cl binding on
amide signal shifts. This is most probably due to the fact
that the amide protons had already been engaged in
intramolecular hydrogen bonding before complexation.
Further evidence concerning the conformation of ligand
applications of anions as effectors in supramolecular
switching devices.
We thank the State Committee for Scientific Research
for Financial Support (Project T09A 087 21).
4
in anion complexes comes from the 2D NOESY spec-
tra (Fig. 3). In the case of the chloride complex of 4
4 + 1.1equiv of TBACl in DMSO-d ) incidental signal
(
6
Supplementary data
overlapping of amide protons and internal aromatic
CH protons precluded observation of the NOE between
them. However, in accordance with the proposed struc-
ture, no effect could be detected between the amide and
The synthetic procedure and characterization data for
compound 4; details concerning determination of bind-
ing constants and X-ray crystal data for 4 and
· Ph PCl are available. Crystallographic data (exclud-
1
the external aromatic protons. In the H NMR spectra
4
4
of fluoride and acetate complexes of 4 all aromatic
and amide signals were clearly distinguishable and
NOE were observed between amide NH protons and
internal aromatic CH protons. At the same time, no ef-
fect was detected between the amide protons and the
external aromatic protons. These spectra indicate that
in the presence of anions the syn–syn conformation of
the isophthalic moieties largely predominates. Taken to-
gether, it is evident that anion induced conformational
change took place and consequently all amide NHs
point toward the cavity (Scheme 2).
ing structure factors) for the structures in this paper
have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Centre as supplementary publication num-
bers CCDC 246610and 246611. Copies of the data can
be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12
1
Summing up, simple isophthalamides may exist as a
mixture of three possible conformers: syn–syn, syn–anti,
and anti–anti. In the case of tetraamide 4 however,
macrocyclic topology and intramolecular hydrogen
bonds impose additional constraints to the system and
lock both isophthalic units in a syn–anti conformation.
We have shown here that anion binding is able to break
these two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and switch
both isophthalic moieties into a syn–syn conformation
leading to a completely different shape for the entire
molecule. Analogous behavior was previously observed
for amides derived from 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid.
They may be switched from the preferred syn–syn con-
formation to an anti–anti conformation through either
References and notes
. (a) Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3348–3391; (b) Stoddart, J. F. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 409–522.
. (a) Petitjean, A.; Khoury, R. G.; Kyritsakas, N.; Lehn,
J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6637–6647; (b)
Barboiu, M.; Vaughan, G.; Kyritsakas, N.; Lehn, J.-M.
Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 763–769; (c) B u¨ schel, M.; Helldo-
bler, M.; Daub, J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1338–1339.
. For recent reviews on anion receptors see: (a) Bondy, C.
R.; Loeb, S. J. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 77–99; (b)
Choi, K.; Hamilton, A. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240,
1
2
3
1
01–110; (c) Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 486–516; (d) Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M.
Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609–1646; (e) Supramolecular
Chemistry of Anions; Bianchi, A., Bowman-James, K.,
Garc ´ı a-Espa n˜ a, E., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997.
1
4
15
cation binding or protonation. This second method
was used to reversibly switch acyclic oligoamides of this
1
5
type between linear and helical forms. We hope that
the above analogy between cation and anion controlled
conformational regulation will promote further fruitful
4. (a) Huang, H.; Mu, L.; He, J.; Cheng, J.-P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 2255–2258; (b) Suh, S. B.; Cui, C.; Son, H.
S.; U, J. S.; Won, Y.; Kim, K. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002,
1
06, 2061–2064; (c) Blanco, J. L. J.; Benito, J. M.; Mellet,
C. O.; Fernandez, J. M. G. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1217–
220.
. (a) Mart ´ı nez-M a´ n˜ ez, R.; Sancen o´ n, F. Chem. Rev. 2003,
03, 4419–4476; (b) Wu, F.-Y.; Li, Z.; Wen, Z.-C.; Zhou,
N.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Jiang, Y.-B. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3203–
205; (c) Demuth, C.; Zerbe, O.; Rognan, D.; S o¨ ll, R.;
Beck-Sickinger, A.; Folkers, G.; Spichinger, U. E. Biosens.
Bioelectron. 2001, 16, 783–789.
6. Keaveney, C. M.; Leigh, D. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1222–1224.
7. Szumna, A.; Jurczak, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 21,
1
5
1
3
H
N
O
O
O
O
O
anion
complexation
NH
NH
HN
HN
N
O
H
H
O
A
N
4
031–4040.
. Chmielewski, M.; Jurczak, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
007–6010.
. Szumna, A.; Gryko, D. T.; Jurczak, J. Heterocycles 2002,
6, 361–368.
N
O
8
9
H
6
5
1
0. Kavallieratos, K.; Bertao, C. M.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 1675–1683.
11. Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151–6170.
Scheme 2.