nucleosides.10,11 For instance, Matzuda described the syn-
thesis of 3′-alkynyl cytosine and 3′-alkynyl uridine.10 The
presence of an additional electrophilic element (alkyne)
imparted to these molecules a high antitumor activity.
Additionally, 4′-alkynyl nucleosides have been prepared and
found to be remarkably active against HIV.11 The high
activity displayed by 3′- and 4′-alkynyl nucleosides poses
questions about the activity of other alkynyl nucleosides
including 1-alkynyl nucleoside analogues. With this in mind,
we set out to develop a synthetic route to families of
C-nucleosides 1 and 2 (Figure 1) that (a) allows the inclusion
Scheme 1. Inouye’s Synthesis of Scaffolds 7 and 812
The stereochemistry at the anomeric position was assigned
by NOE experiments: in the â anomer, positive NOE was
observed between the anomeric H-5 and H-2; in the R
anomer, positive NOE was observed between the anomeric
H-5 and H-3 and between the anomeric H-5 and H-6.
Scheme 2. Stereospecific Synthesis of 7 and 8
Figure 1. A family of 2-deoxyribose-based C-nucleosides.
of a wide variety of heterocyclic moieties, (b) allows the
introduction of an alkynyl moiety at C-1′, and (c) allows
the preparation of R and â C-nucleosides independently. We
now report a preliminary account of the studies we have
undertaken.
A retrosynthetic analysis of C-nucleosides 1 and 2 identi-
fied 1-alkynyl-2-deoxy-D-ribose 3 as a key synthon for their
preparation. For example, several compounds of general
structure 1 could potentially be prepared from 3 by reacting
the alkyne moiety in a cycloaddition reaction with various
1,3-dipoles. Alternatively, 1-alkynyl C-nucleosides of struc-
ture 2 could be obtained from 3 through a Sonogashira
coupling or through a reaction with a suitable electrophile.
A literature survey revealed that the preparation of 1-alkynyl-
2-deoxy-D-riboses 7 and 8 has been reported.12 In this report,
4 (Scheme 1) was converted to 7 and 8 by treatment with
alkynylmagnesium bromide followed by intramolecular
Nicholas reaction.
This route offered the advantage of avoiding the use of
highly sensitive Co2(CO)8 and rendered the preparation of 7
and 8 operationally simpler. Additionally, the chromato-
graphic separation of 5 and 6 was easier compared to the
separation of 7 from 8. With compounds 7 and 8 in hand,
we explored their potential for the preparation of C-
nucleosides of structures 1 and 2.
We began our studies by generating the lithium alkynoates
of 7 and 8 (Scheme 3 and Table 1) and then reacting them
On the basis of this report, we have developed a more
practical synthesis of compounds 7 and 8 that allowed their
selective preparation independently (Scheme 2). In our
synthesis, 3,5-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-D-ribofuranose 4 was
reacted with ethynylmagnesium bromide and the resulting
diastereoisomeric diols 5 and 6 were subsequently separated
by SiO2 column chromatography. Diols 5 and 6 were then
independently reacted with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride and
base to obtain 7 and 8, respectively, in stereospecific fashion.
Scheme 3. Preparation of Propargyl Alcohols 9-12
(10) Hattori, H.; Nozawa, E.; Iino, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Shuto, S.;
Shimamoto, Y.; Nomura, M.; Fukushima, M.; Tanaka, M.; Sasaki, T.;
Matzuda, A. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 2892.
(11) Ohrui, H.; Kohgo, S.; Kitano, K.; Sakata, S.; Kodama, E.;
Yoshimura, K.; Matsuoka, M.; Shigeta, S.; Mitzuya, H. J. Med. Chem. 2000,
43, 4516.
with aromatic or aliphatic aldehydes. 2-Furaldehyde and
cyclohexylcarboxaldehyde were selected as examples of an
aromatic and an aliphatic aldehyde. We were delighted to
observe that, in these experiments, propargylic alcohols 9-12
were obtained in high isolated yields (Scheme 3 and Table
(12) Masayoshi, T.; Morikawa, T.; Abe, H.; Inouye, M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 625.
4444
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 22, 2007