3
798
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3798-3799
(
r-Am in oa lk yl)cu p r a tes P r ep a r ed fr om
tions of (R-aminoalkyl)cuprates to a variety of carboxylic
acid derivatives (eq 1).
Solu ble Cop p er (I) Sa lts: Con ju ga te
Ad d ition s to r,â-Un sa tu r a ted Ca r boxylic
Acid Der iva tives
R. Karl Dieter* and Sadanandan E. Velu
Hunter Laboratory, Department of Chemistry,
Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-1905
Received March 11, 1997
In initial studies, (R-aminoalkyl)cuprates prepared
from tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc)-protected pyrrolidine (1)
or N,N-dimethylamine (2) and CuCN in either Et
2
O or
The development of (R-aminoalkyl)cuprate chemistry
has been hampered by the limited reactivity of these
reagents. While they undergo conjugate addition to R,â-
THF failed to undergo conjugate addition to either methyl
acrylate or methyl crotonate. Cuprates prepared from
the Boc carbamate of N-methyl-N-[(tri-n-butylstannyl)-
methyl]amine via transmetallation ((i) n-BuLi, -78 °C,
THF, absence of sparteine; (ii) CuCN) also failed to react
with methyl acrylate.11 Low yields of conjugate adducts
could be obtained with the alkylcopper reagent prepared
1
enones, the reaction could not be extended to R,â-enoates
consistent with cuprate-enoate reactivity profiles. Al-
though numerous homo and mixed organocuprates readily
transfer alkyl ligands to the â-carbon atom of R,â-enones,
the conjugate addition reaction is often sluggish with the
less reactive enoate substrates. Cuprates prepared from
2
3
CuCN (2 RLi + CuCN), cuprous thiophenoxides, and
2 2 2
from CuI in Et O (9%) or CH Cl
(28%).11 Subsequent
experimentation revealed that preparation of the cuprate
4
copper(I) (trimethylsilyl)acetylide have provided partial
solutions to this problem. The reactivity of the latter
reagent was enhanced by solvent composition (4:1 ether:
THF) and by the addition of chlorotrimethylsilane.4
Gilman reagents also effect high-yield conjugate addition
reactions with mono â-alkyl-substituted enoates, en-
amides, and enecarbamates in ether in the presence of
TMSCl.5 Alkylcopper compounds also participate with
enoates in conjugate addition reactions in synthetically
reagent from 1 or 2 [i. sec-BuLi, (-)-sparteine, THF, -78
°
C, 1 h; (ii) CuCN‚2LiCl, THF, -78 to -55 °C, 45 min]
and LiCl-solubilized CuCN generated efficacious reagents
that underwent conjugate addition to methyl acrylate
[THF, TMSCl, -55 °C, 0.5 h to room temperature (1.5
h)] in the presence of TMSCl in high yields (Table 1,
entries 1 and 2). Utilization of ethyl crotonate resulted
in significantly reduced yields of conjugate adducts
accompanied by recovered carbamates (Table 1, entries
useful yields in the presence of additives such as BF
3
2
‚Et O
and chloro- or iodotrimethylsilane.6
3
(
and 8). Deprotonation of 1, aided by either TMEDA or
-)-sparteine, gave similar results for the subsequent
cuprate conjugate additions to ethyl crotonate (52% vs
6-77% yields, respectively), and the use of CuCN‚2LiI
The choice of copper(I) salt often plays a significant
role in the chemistry of the resultant organocopper and
cuprate reagents, and CuCN and CuBr‚SMe have been
2
5
promoted as the best Cu(I) precursors.7 Organocopper
reagents prepared from CuCN and either 1 or 2 equiv of
an alkyllithium reagent often display superior attributes
with regard to chemical yields, suggesting an important
role of the cyanide anion. The structure of the latter
reagent has been the subject of considerable interest
centering around the location of the cyanide ion.8 Al-
though THF-soluble CuCN‚2LiCl has been extensively
used by Knochel in the Cu-promoted reactions of organo-
(
(
53%) or excess LiCl (i.e., CuCN‚4LiCl) had little effect
58% vs 56-77%, Table 1, entry 8).1 Cuprates prepared
a
from 2 failed to react with ethyl tiglate or with methyl
cyclohexene-1-carboxylate, while cuprates prepared from
1
gave low yields with the former (Table 1, entry 17) and
no conjugate adduct with the latter (Table 1, entry 19).
In an effort to circumvent the deleterious effects of
R-alkyl substitution, the corresponding thiol ester func-
tionality was examined with the expectation that the
lower LUMO energies of these substrates might enhance
9
zinc reagents, this source of Cu(I) has not been widely
used in the generation of cuprates from alkyllithium or
Grignard reagents.10 We have found that the combined
use of LiCl-solubilized CuCN and TMSCl synergistically
improve chemical yields in the conjugate addition reac-
1
2
their reactivity with cuprate reagents.
Anticipating
competitive acylation13 and conjugate addition pathways,
both the n-butyl and tert-butyl thiol esters were exam-
ined. Surprisingly, both derivatives gave good to excel-
lent yields of conjugate adducts with no acylation prod-
ucts being observed (Table 1, entries 4, 6, 10, and 12).
The thiol esters offered little advantage in the reactions
with the acyclic R-alkyl-substituted substrates (Table 1,
entry 18) but facilitated the reaction with the 1-cyclo-
hexene derivative (Table 1, entry 20). In an effort to
probe the greater reactivity of the thiol esters, a series
of organocopper reagents were examined. The cyano-
(1) (a) Dieter, R. K.; Alexander, C. W. Synlett 1993, 407. (b) Dieter,
R. K.; Alexander, C. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5693.
(
(
(
(
2) Lipshutz, B. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 127.
3) Behforousz, M.; Curran, T. T.; Bolan, J . Ibid. 1986, 27, 3107.
4) Sakata, H.; Kuwajima, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5719.
5) Alexakis, A.; Berlan, J .; Besace, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27,
1
047.
(
6) (a) Bergdahl, M.; Lindstedt, E.-L.; Nilsson, M. Tetrahedron 1988,
4
4, 2055. (b) Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Yatagai, H.; Ishihara, Y.;
Maruyama, K. J . Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 119.
7) Bertz, S. H.; Gibson, C. P.; Dabbagh, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987
8, 4251.
8) (a) Bertz, S. H.; Miao, G.; Eriksson, M. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1996, 815. (b) Snyder, J . P.; Bertz, S. H. J . Org. Chem. 1995,
0, 4312. (c) Barnhart, T. M.; Huang, H.; Penner-Hahn, J . E. J . Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 4310. (d) Lipshutz, B. H.; J ames, B. Ibid. 1994, 59,
(
2
(11) Alexander, C. W. Ph.D Dissertation, Clemson University, 1993.
(12) AM1 calculations obtained from the MacSpartan program
(Wavefunction, Inc., 18401 Von Karman Ave, #370, Irvine, CA 92715)
gave the following relative ordering of LUMO energies: thiol esters <
esters < imides. The calculated magnitude of the LUMO energies
displayed no clear correlation with the observed chemical yields.
(13) (a) Anderson, R. J .; Henrick, C. A.; Rosenblum, L. D. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3654. (b) Corey, E. J .; Hopkins, P. B.; Kim, S.;
Yoo, S.; Nambiar, K. P.; Falck, J . R. Ibid. 1979, 101, 7131. (c) Collum,
D. B.; McDonald, J . H.; Still, W. C. Ibid. 1980, 102, 2120.
(
6
7
585.
(9) Knochel, P.; Singer, R. D. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2117.
10) Backvall, J .-E.; Persson, E. S. M.; Bombrun, A. J . Org. Chem.
(
1
6
994, 59, 4126. (b) Schlosser, M.; Bossert, H. Tetrahedron 1991, 47,
287.
S0022-3263(97)00443-X CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society