Decomposition of CH4 over a Ni-Cu-MgO Catalyst
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 52, 2004 20277
ature the lifetime of the Ni-Cu-MgO catalyst was strongly
dependent upon the reaction temperature. In addition, XRD
measurements indicated that the crystallite size of Ni-Cu alloy
particles in the Ni-Cu-MgO catalyst increased as a function
of reduction temperature. This aspect accounts for the finding
that for a constant reaction temperature the stability of the
catalyst was also strongly influenced by the reduction temper-
ature (Table 1). Furthermore, the fraction of surface Ni0 sites
in the Ni-Cu-MgO catalyst is enhanced during reaction and
the final composition of the particle surface is dependent upon
the reaction temperature. Therefore, methane conversion is not
only affected by the reaction temperature but also by the ultimate
number of surface Ni0 sites that the hydrocarbon encounters
during adsorption on the particle surface. This rationale accounts
for why the initial methane conversion did not exhibit an
exponential increase with reaction temperature for a constant
reduction temperature (Table 1).
A further fascinating aspect that emerges from this investiga-
tion concerns the structural characteristics of the carbon nano-
fibers generated from the Ni-Cu-MgO/CH4 reaction. The
finding that the nanofibers adopt a “platelet” conformation is
totally unexpected, since the interaction of this particular
bimetallic composition with other hydrocarbons always leads
to the formation of “herringbone” structures.21,27 Indeed, the
formation of “platelet” nanofiber structures has generally been
reported from reactions where CO has been passed over an iron-
containing catalyst.23-30 It would appear that the chemistry
involved in the interaction of the Ni-Cu-MgO system creates
metal particles that adopt specific crystallographic orientations
that favor the precipitation of carbon in the form of graphite
sheets that are aligned in a direction perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of the fiber.
adjacent graphite layers increases. The smaller dimensions of
the nanofibers generated from the new catalyst system is also
reflected in a larger value of the surface area.
References and Notes
(1) Pourier, M. G.; Sapundzhiev, C. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1997,
22, 429.
(2) Zhang, T.; Amiridis, M. D. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1998, 167, 161.
(3) Muradov, N. Z. Energy Fuels 1998, 12, 41.
(4) Aiello, R.; Fiscus, J. E.; zur Loye, H.-C.; Amiridis, M. D. Appl.
Catal. A: Gen. 2000, 192, 227.
(5) Ermakova, M. A.; Ermakov, D. Yu.; Kuvshinov, G. G. Appl. Catal.
A: Gen. 2000, 201, 61.
(6) Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Qin, Y.; Chang, L. Energy Fuels 2000, 14, 1188.
(7) Muradov, N. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2001, 26, 1165.
(8) Choudhary, T. V.; Sivadinarayana, C.; Chusuei, C. C.; Klinghoffer,
A.; Goodman, D. W. J. Catal. 2001, 199, 9.
(9) Takenaka, S.; Ogihara, H.; Yamanaka, I.; Otsuka, K. Appl. Catal.
A: Gen. 2001, 217, 101.
(10) Shah, N.; Panjala, D.; Huffman, G. P. Energy Fuels 2001, 15, 1528.
(11) Piao, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Chang, L. J.; Lin, Y. S. Catal. Today
2002, 74, 145.
(12) Ermakova, M. A.; Ermakov, D. Yu. Catal. Today 2002, 77, 225.
(13) Takenaka, S.; Shigeta, Y.; Otsuka, K. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 26.
(14) Villacampa, J. I.; Royo, C.; Romeo, E.; Montoya, J. A.; Del Angel,
P.; MonzOÄ n, A. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2003, 252, 363.
(15) De Jong, K. P.; Geus, J. W. Catal. ReV.-Sci. Eng. 2000, 42, 481.
(16) Khulbe, K. C.; Mann, R. S. Catal. ReV.-Sci. Eng. 1982, 24, 311.
(17) Ponec, V. Int. Quantum Chem. 1977, 12, 1.
(18) Sinfelt, J. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1977, 10, 15.
(19) Bernardo, C. A.; Altrup. I.; Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R. J. Catal. 1985,
96, 517.
(20) Tavares, M. T.; Bernardo, C. A.; Altrup, I.; Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R.
J. Catal. 1986, 100, 545.
(21) Kim, M. S.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1991,
131, 60.
(22) Rodriguez, N. M.; Chambers, A.; Baker, R. T. K. Langmuir 1995,
11, 3862.
(23) Baker, R. T. K.; Barber, M. A.; Harris, P. S.; Feates, F. S.; Waite,
R. J. J. Catal. 1972, 26, 51.
(24) Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R. J. Catal. 1972, 10, 221.
(25) Baker, R. T. K. In Gas Chemistry in Nuclear Reactors and Large
Industrial Plant; Dyer, A., Ed.; Heyden: 1980; p 18.
(26) Helveg, S.; Lopez-Cartes, C.; Sehested, J.; Hansen, P. L.; Clausen,
B. S.; Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Norskov, J. K. Nature
2004, 427, 426.
(27) Marotta, C. L.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003,
195, 209.
(28) Murayama, H.; Maeda, T. Nature 1990, 345, 791.
(29) Rodriguez, N. M.; Kim, M. S.; Baker, R. T. K. J. Catal. 1993,
144, 93.
A comparison is given in Table 3 of the respective yields
and physical and structural characteristics of “platelet” graphite
nanofibers grown from the decomposition of CH4 over NiX-
CuyMgzO (x:y:z ) 2.4:0.8:1) at 665 °C with similar materials
synthesized from the interaction of Cu-Fe (3:7) with CO/H2
at the same temperature.30 Inspection of these data reveals that
by using the new catalyst system one can synthesize “platelet”
graphite nanofibers having a significantly narrower width than
those grown from the traditional catalyst. It is also evident that
the van der Waals forces are weaker as the width of the
structures decreases, and as a consequence, the spacing between
(30) Carneiro, O. C.; Kim, M. S.; Yim, J. B.; Rodriguez, N. M.; Baker,
R. T. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4237.