358
BYCHKOV et al.
At 700°C the reactivity of Pt/Al2O3 toward ëé2 is nickel according to which the process occurs via the
intermediate formation of nickel carbide. In our exper-
iments with a small amount of coke, there are only pre-
cursors of these bulk carbon particles, but the results
agree well with the published data.
Different reactivities of carbon on Pt/Al2O3 and
Ni(Co)/Al2O3 reveal themselves in different catalytic
stabilities of these samples. In the pulse regime at
700°ë, the catalytic activity of Ni(Co)/Al2O3 in CO2
reforming of methane was stable and high [3, 4]. The
activity of Pt/Al2O3 noticeably decreases with the num-
much lower than the reactivity toward reduced Ni(Co)
catalysts for which a 2–3% conversion of ëé2 into CO
was observed [3, 4]. In the case of Pt/Al2O3, no CO for-
mation was detected. This is probably due to the insuf-
ficiently high value of the binding energy of oxygen
with the platinum surface, which can be judged from
the value of the heat of oxidation, kJ/mol O2: Qox =
260–290 (Pt/Al2O3), 470–490 (Ni/Al2O3) [3], and 450–
470 (Co/Al2O3) [4]. This means that, as in the case of
the Ni(Co) system, the activation of ëé2 via reactions (II)
and (III) does not play an important role in ëé2 reform- ber of pulse (Fig. 5). Additional coking of the Pt/Al2O3
catalyst due to a 100% ëç4 pulse decreases the yield of
CO and ç2 (Fig. 5, pulse 15). In further pulses of the
ëç4 + ëé2 mixture, the catalytic activity increases but
does not restore the initial value. In the case of
ëÓ/Al2O3 in an analogous experiment [4], additional
catalyst coking only lead to a slight reversible decrease
ing of methane.
The rate of ëé2 reaction with surface carbon (IV)
on Pt/Al2O3 is much higher than the rate of reaction (II).
However, it is an order of magnitude lower than the rate
of the analogous reaction on the Ni(Co) samples, and
the maximal conversion of ëé2 (~2.5%) is much lower in the catalytic activity.
than the ëé2 conversion under conditions of catalysis
at the same temperature (70–80%). It is likely that this
is due to different properties of the surface carbon on
Earlier we concluded that the interaction of ëé2
with the carbide carbon (IV) is the main route of ëé2
activation on Ni(Co) catalysts [3, 4]. In the case of
Pt/Al2O3. Because a decrease in the rate of methane Pt/Al2O3, the rate of reaction between ëé2 and graphite
carbon cannot be responsible for the apparent conver-
sion of ëé2 under catalytic conditions. The carbon spe-
cies that has a shorter lifetime (less than a second) on
Pt/Al2O3 is probably more reactive toward ëé2 than
graphite carbon, and such short-lived carbon is the
main intermediate in ëé2 reforming of methane.
decomposition with an increase in the number of ëç4
pulses is due to site blocking with coke on the surface
of metallic particles, the effect of the time interval
between ëç4 methane pulses on the dependence of the
ç2 yield on the number of pulses would point to the
motion of surface carbon for the time between pulses.
It was shown for ëÓ/Al2O3 [4] that, in the interval 10–
20 min after the formation of surface carbon in the
decomposition of methane, carbon diffusion with the
formation of its more stable form and a cleaning of the
cobalt surface are observed. In this case the value of the
enthalpy of formation (30–60 kJ/mol [4]) for this car-
bon is close to carbon in cobalt carbide. Conversely, in
the case of Pt/Al2O3, the formation of ç2 in the series
of ëç4 pulses with intervals between pulses 20 s and
10 min is practically identical (Fig. 2). This means that
the form of carbon formed during first seconds after
methane decomposition is rather stable under the reac-
tion conditions. Calorimetric measurements suggest
Thus, in the course of ëé2 reforming of methane, car-
bon formed by methane decomposition (reaction (V)) par-
ticipates in two competing processes: (1) a reaction
with ëé2 (IV) to form CO and (2) an agglomeration
with the formation of stable carbon. In the case of
Ni(Co)/Al2O3 catalysts, this stable form of carbon is
carbide carbon. It is highly reactive toward ëé2 and is
an active intermediate of ëé2 reforming of methane.
Moreover, carbide carbon does not block the surface of
metallic particles. In the case of Pt/Al2O3, carbon is sta-
bilized right on the platinum surface in a graphite-like
state and blocks the catalytic sites. The reactivity of
graphite carbon toward ëé2 is an order of magnitude
lower than the reactivity of carbide carbon. This pre-
vents it from being an active intermediate of CO2
reforming of methane.
that the value of ∆HCf for this carbon is close to zero,
and this value characterizes it as graphite carbon, in
contrast to carbide carbon on ëÓ/Al2O3.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Different states of carbon on platinum and nickel
catalysts have been observed many times using micros-
copy, although in all cases the sample contained a large
amount of carbon after long treatment under reaction
conditions. These results suggest that, when the amount
of coke in nickel and cobalt systems is large, the forma-
tion of carbon filaments and nanotubes is observed [11,
12]. On platinum, large agglomerates with an undefined
indeterminate shape and containing graphite-like impu-
rities are formed [13, 14]. Zaikovskii et al. [11] pro-
posed a mechanism for carbon nanotube formation on
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation
for Basic Research (grant no. 01-03-32554).
REFERENCES
1. Bradford, M.C.J. and Vannice, M.A., Catal. Rev.–Sci.
Eng., 1999, vol. 41, no. 1, p. 1.
2. Krylov, O.V., Ross. Khim. Zh., 2000, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 19.
3. Bychkov, V.Yu., Krylov, O.V., and Korchak, V.N., Kinet.
Katal., 2002, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 94.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 44 No. 3 2003