Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 84, No. 4, 26 January 2004
Cho et al.
573
FIG. 4. Change in the Al 2p XPS spectra of a Hf–Al–O ͑15 Å͒ film as a
function of annealing temperature at ͑a͒ as-grown, ͑b͒ 850 °C, and ͑c͒
900 °C for 5 min in the UHV circumstances. The reported binding energy
related to the Al silicate and Al O are located from 74.4 eV to 74.8 eV and
2
3
from 75.5 to 75.8, respectively.
gen in HfO is evacuated to form a silicide layer. The simple
2
dissociation process of the oxides can be written as ͑In this
FIG. 3. XPS peak spectra of Si 2p and Hf 4f after the Al–Hf–O ͑15 Å͒ film
was annealed at a temperature of 850 °C for 5 min in the UHV conditions.
Si 2p spectra and Hf 4f spectra ͑inset͒ were obtained at different take-off
angles of 90° and 30° with respect to film surface. Si and Si** are caused
by the Si surface reconstruction structure and the Hf silicide layer, respec-
tively.
process, SiO2 is included because silicate and interfacial
SiO should be considered.͒
2
s
HfO ϩSiO ϩSi→HfSi ϩSiO͑g͒ϩSi, Al O ϩSiO
2
2
x
2
3
2
ϩSi→AlO ͑g͒ϩSiO͑g͒ϩSi.
x
In summary, peak changes of Hf, Al, and Si indicate that
charge transfer is closely related to changes in the bonding
characteristics, suggesting that the thermal stability of Hf–
Al–O films is largely dependent on the incorporation of Al-
temperature of 700 °C ͑data not reported in this article͒.9
Figure 3 shows the changed chemical state of the film, i.e.,
the Si peaks related to the interfacial SiO and silicate are
2
reduced, and metallic Hf peaks appear. The peak difference
is dependent on the take-off angle, indicating that the disso-
ciation and outdiffusion process occur preferentially at the
surface region, and not at the interface. The Hf peak related
to the Hf silicate and Al O incorporation can be deconvo-
oxide into the HfO film. This suggests that the metal oxide
can be stabilized by changing the bonding characteristics via
the addition of a metal oxide as a dopant.
2
This work was supported by the National Program for
Tera-level Nanodevices of the Ministry of Science and Tech-
nology as one of the 21 Century Frontier Programs.
2
3
luted from the difference of the peak profile between the
surface and the interface. If the incorporation of Al O into
2
3
HfO has the same role as the SiO in HfO , the charge
1
2
3
2
2
2
A. Kurokawa, K. Nakamura, S. Ichimura, and D. W. Moon, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 76, 493 ͑2000͒.
H. Fukuda, M. Yasuda, and T. Iwabuchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 693
͑1992͒.
transfer would be similar because the covalent cation Al is
able to affect the charge transfer process similar to covalent
Si in the Hf–Si-oxide.11 The NEXAFS spectra are also con-
sistent with that the covalent character of the bonding of the
Al O responsible for this peak shift, which is consistent
M.-Y. Ho, H. Gong, G. D. Wilk, B. W. Busch, M. L. Green, W. H. Lin, A.
See, S. K. Lahiri, M. E. Loomans, Petri I. Raisanen, and T. Gustafsson,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4218 ͑2002͒.
¨ ¨
2
3
4
5
G. Lucovsky and G. B. Rayner, Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2912 ͑2000͒.
K. Kukli, J. Ihanus, M. Ritala, and M. Leskela, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3737
with the formation of Hf–O–Al cross-linking bonds as the
Hf silicate is formed.6,10
͑
1996͒.
6
An abrupt change in Al O in the Hf–Al–O was ob-
M.-H. Cho, Y. S. Roh, C. N. Whang, K. Jeong, H. J. Choi, S. W. Nam,
2
3
served, i.e., the decrease in Al O due to the dissociation of
D.-H. Ko, J. H. Lee, N. I. Lee, and K. Fujihara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1071
2
3
͑
2002͒.
the Al O and outdiffusion under vacuum annealing at a
2
3
7
8
V. V. Afanas’ev, A. Stesmans, and W. Tsai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 245
2003͒.
temperature of 850 °C influences the peak shift as shown in
͑
1
2
Fig. 4. This temperature is similar to the formation tem-
perature for a HfO /Al O multilayer to a mixed structure,
O. Renault, D. Samour, J.-F. Damlencourt, D. Blin, F. Martin, S. Marthon,
N. T. Barrett, and P. Besson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3627 ͑2002͒.
M.-H. Cho, Y. S. Roh, C. N. Whang, K. Jeong, S. W. Nam, D.-H. Ko, J. H.
Lee, N. I. Lee, and K. Fujihara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 472 ͑2002͒.
M. S a´ nchez-Agudo, L. Soriano, C. Quir o´ s, J. Avila, and J. M. Sanz, Surf.
2
2
3
9
which is related to the dissociation temperature of amor-
phous Al O because the dissociation of pure Al O starts at
10
2
3
2
3
the temperature employed in the formation of the mixed
structure. Moreover, elemental Hf readily reacts with Si to
form Hf silicide, while Al does not react with Si. Thus, the
Sci. 482, 470 ͑2001͒.
M. J. Guittet, J. P. Crocombette, and M. Gautier-Soyer, Phys. Rev. B 63,
1
1
125117 ͑2001͒.
12
M.-H. Cho, Y. S. Roh, H.-J. Choi, S. W. Nam, D.-H. Ko, J. H. Ku, H. C.
Kang, D. Y. Noh, C. N. Whang, and K. Jeong, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 20,
865 ͑2002͒.
decomposed Al O is evacuated into the vacuum in gaseous
2
3
states, such as Al O and Al O , while the dissociated oxy-
2
2
2
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
32.203.227.62 On: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 11:26:52
1