A. Quaranta et al. / Chemical Physics 354 (2008) 174–179
179
[
[
8] J.M. Haider, Z. Pikramenou, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34 (2005) 120.
9] R. Villalonga, R. Cao, A. Fragoso, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 3088.
4
. Conclusion
[
10] T. Andersson, G. Westman, O. Wennerström, M. Sundahl, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 2 (1994) 1097.
Our pulse radiolysis investigation on 2:1 c-cyclodextrin/[60]ful-
lerene inclusion complexes in aqueous solutions, establishes an
[11] C.N. Murthy, K.E. Geckeler, Chem. Commun. (2001) 1194.
[12] K.I. Priyadarsini, H. Mohan, J.P. Mittal, D.M. Guldi, K.D. Asmus, J. Phys. Chem.
Å
Å
important property of c-CD radicals, which are generated by HO
98 (1994) 9565.
radicals abstracting hydrogen atoms of a glucose ring, component
of the cyclodextrin: their ability to act as reducing species when
reacting with C60 in 2:1 c-CD/C60 inclusion complexes via
[
[
13] A.J. Swallow, Radiation Chemistry, An Introduction, Longman Group Ltd.,
London, 1973.
14] G.E. Adams, J.W. Boag, B.D. Michael, J. Currant, in: M. Ebert, J.H. Baxendale, J.P.
Keene, A.J. Swallow (Eds.), Pulse Radiolysis, Academic Press, London, 1965, p.
117.
15] Z.-I. Yoshida, H. Takekuma, S.-I. Takekuma, Y. Matsubara, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 33 (1994) 1597.
16] P. Wardman, E.D. Clarke, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans. I 72 (1976) 1377.
17] L.M. Dorfman, D.A. Harter, I.A. Taub, J. Chem. Phys. 41 (1964) 2954.
Å
-CDox=C þ Hþ
Åꢀ
c
-CD =C60
!
c
ð8Þ
6
0
[
Reaction (8) allows us to estimate that the oxidation potential of
[
[
Å
c
-CD radicals is more negative than ꢀ250 mV vs. NHE, because
Å
the
c
-CD radicals are capable of reducing the inclusion complex
[18] M. Roder, L. Wojnarovits, G. Foldiak, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 36 (1990) 175.
[
[
19] R.V. Bensasson, E. Bienvenue, M. Dellinger, S. Leach, P. Seta, J. Phys. Chem. 98
1994) 3492.
2
:1
c-CD/C60 which has a reduction potential
(
Åꢀ
20] D.J. Holder, D. Allan, E.J. Land, S. Navaratnam, in: T. Garvey, J. Le Duff, P. Le
Rux, C. Petit-Jean-Genaz, J. Poole, L. Rivkin (Eds.), Proceedings of eighth
European Particle Accelerator Conference, European Physical Society, Paris,
Eð2 : 1
c
-CD=C60=2 : 1
c
-CD=C Þ ꢂ ꢀ250 mV vs: NHE ½33ꢄ:
6
0
Å
These
c
-CD radicals can also reduce another electron acceptor
2002, p. 2804.
molecule, 9,10-anthraquinone-2-sulfonate ion (AQS). Thus, these
[
21] J. Butler, B.W. Hodgson, B.M. Hoey, E.J. Land, J.S. Lea, E.J. Lindley, F.A.P. Rushton,
A.J. Swallow, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 34 (1989) 633.
Å
c
-CD radicals have an oxidation potential more negative than
Åꢀ
[
[
[
22] G.V. Buxton, C.R. Stuart, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91 (1995) 279.
23] C. Ferradini, J.-P. Jay-Gerin, Can. J. Chem. 77 (1999) 1542.
24] R.V. Bensasson, E.J. Land, T.G. Truscott, Flash Photolysis and Pulse Radiolysis,
Contributions to the Chemistry of Biology and Medicine, Pergamon Press,
Oxford, 1983. pp. 6–8.
25] S. Leach, M. Vervloet, A. Deprès, E. Bréheret, J.P. Hare, T.J. Dennis, H.W. Kroto, R.
Taylor, D.R.M. Walton, Chem. Phys. 160 (1992) 451.
26] R.V. Bensasson, E. Bienvenue, M. Dellinger, S. Leach, P. Seta, J. Phys. Chem. 98
the reduction potential of AQS, E (AQS/AQS ) which is ꢂꢀ390 mV
vs. NHE [44].
At radiation doses higher than 12 Gy, a doubly reduced fuller-
2
6
ꢀ
2ꢀ
ene, C , is observed. This doubly reduced fullerene, C60 , decays
0
[
[
to give the C60 monoanion via a reduction of neighbouring inclu-
sion complexes:
(
1994) 3492.
2
6
ꢀ
Åꢀ
c
-CDox=C
þ
c-CD=C60 ! 2ð
c
-CD=C Þ
ð10Þ
[27] T. Andersson, G. Westman, G. Stenhagen, M. Sundahl, O. Wennerström,
Tetrahedron Lett. 36 (1995) 597.
[28] Á. Buvári-Barcza, L. Barcza, T. Braun, I. Konkoly-Thege, K. Ludányi, K. Vékey,
Fullerene Sci. Technol. 5 (1997) 311.
29] M. Sundahl, T. Andersson, K. Nilsson, O. Wennerström, G. Westman, Synth.
Met. 55–57 (1993) 3252.
[30] T. Loftsson, M. Masson, M.E. Brewster, J. Pharm. Sci. 93 (2004) 1091.
[31] A.J. Swallow, Radiation Chemistry, An Introduction, Longman Group Ltd.,
London, 1973.
0
60
It can be emphasised that the
c
-CD environment does not sig-
nificantly modify the absorption spectrum and the molar absorp-
tion coefficient of the mono-anion of C60 as compared to those
previously determined in organic solvents, such as benzonitrile
35], dichloromethane [36], methyltetrahydrofuran [37], toluene
38,39] toluene/2-propanol/acetone (8:1:1) [38], 2-propanol [40]
[
[
[
[
32] G.V. Buxton, C.L. Greenstock, W.P. Helman, A.B. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
7 (1988) 513.
2
and toluene/CH Cl [41].
1
[
[
33] N.M. Dimitrijevic, P.V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 7623.
34] C.R. Cantor, P.R. Schimmel, Biophysical Chemistry Part II: Techniques for the
Study of Biological Structures and Function, W.H. Freeman & Company, NY,
Acknowledgments
1980. pp. 349–408.
The authors acknowledge for financial support the European
Commission (Contract ‘‘WONDERFUL”, HPRN-CT-2002-00177)
and the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (No. ANR-05-
JCJC-0211-03). Pulse radiolysis was carried out at the Free Radical
Research Facility in the Synchrotron Radiation Department of the
STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, UK, with the support of
the European Commission through the ‘‘Improving Human Poten-
tial Transnational Access to major Research Infrastructures” (Con-
tract HPRI-CT-2002-00183). The authors thank Professor Yong
Chen of Nankai University (China) for fruitful discussions.
[35] J.W. Arbogast, C.S. Foote, M. Kao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 2277.
[
[
[
[
36] G.A. Heath, J.E. McGrady, R.L. Martin, J. Chem. Soc. – Chem. Commun. 17 (1992)
272.
37] T. Kato, T. Kodama, T. Shida, T. Nakagawa, Y. Matsui, S. Suzuki, H. Shiromaru, K.
Yamauchi, Y. Achiba, Chem. Phys. Lett. 180 (1991) 446.
1
38] D.M. Guldi, H. Hungerbuhler, E. Janata, K.D. Asmus, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993)
11258.
39] R.J. Sension, A.Z. Szarka, G.R. Smith, R.M. Hochstrasser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 185
(1991) 179.
[
[
[
40] D.M. Guldi, Res. Chem. Intermed. 23 (1997) 653.
41] M.A. Greaney, S.M. Gorun, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 7142.
42] G.O. Phillips, Radiat. Res. 18 (1963) 446.
[43] B.E. Hulme, E.J. Land, G.O. Phillips, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 68 (1972) 1992.
[
[
[
44] P. Wardman, J. Phys. Chem., Ref. Data 18 (1989) 1637.
45] N.M. Dimitrijevic, P.V. Kamat, R.W. Fessenden, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 615.
46] J.R. Morton, K.F. Preston, P.J. Krusic, S.A. Hill, E. Wasserman, J. Phys. Chem. 96
References
(
1992) 3576.
47] P.J. Krusic, E. Wasserman, P.N. Keizer, J.R. Morton, K.F. Preston, Science 254
1991) 1183.
[
[
[
[
[
1] J. Szejtli, Chem. Rev. 98 (1998) 1743.
[
2] E. Engeldinger, D. Armspach, D. Matt, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 4147.
3] T. Loftsson, M. Masson, Int. J. Pharm. 225 (2001) 15.
4] K. Uekama, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 52 (2004) 900.
(
[
[
[
48] M. Walbiner, H. Fischer, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 4880.
49] N.M. Dimitrijevic, Chem. Phys. Lett. 194 (1992) 457.
50] P.J. Krusic, E. Wasserman, B.A. Parkinson, B. Malone, E.R. Holler, P.N. Keizer, J.R.
Morton, K.F. Preston, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 (1991) 6274.
51] L.B. Gan, S.H. Huang, X.A. Zhang, A.X. Zhang, B.C. Cheng, H. Cheng, X.L. Li, G.
Shang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 13384.
5] L. Ribeiro, A. Falcão, J. Patrício, D. Ferreira, F. Veiga, J. Pharm. Sci. 96 (2007)
2
018.
[
[
6] H. Chen, J. Gao, F. Wang, W. Liang, Drug Deliv. 14 (2007) 201.
7] F. Cacialli, J.S. Wilson, J.J. Michels, C. Daniel, C. Silva, R.H. Friend, N. Severin, P.
Samori, J.P. Rabe, M.J. O’Connell, P.N. Taylor, H.L. Anderson, Nature Mater. 1
[
[
52] C.A. Reed, R.D. Bolskar, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 1075.
(
2002) 160.