CARBON BLACK OXIDATION MECHANISM IN LOOSE AND TIGHT CONTACTS
845
4
+
3+
(
Fig. 1). At 392°ë total CB combustion is observed reduction of Ce ions into Ce ions with the reaction
during the catalytic test.
advance. Thus, the increase of the EPR intensity rela-
3
+
Another signal denoted S2 is observed. The S2 sig- tive to the Ce signal is more pronounced between
nal is isotropic with giso = 2.003 and a line width of 500–600°ë for loose contact and 300–400°ë for tight
∆
H = 3.5 G. The appearance of the S2 signal indicates contact mixtures, respectively (Fig. 1 and Table 1), in
the formation of new paramagnetic species consistent accordance with the temperature ranges for catalytic
with localized paramagnetic spins on the carbon parti- oxidation of CB in the presence of CeO in loose and
2
cles and catalyst interface and can be considered as a tight contacts.
fingerprint of the contact between the two solids [11]. It
is important to note that neither compressed carbon
CONCLUSIONS
black nor the catalyst, treated alone in the mixing con-
ditions, provides the S2 signal. This result supports the
above attribution of the S2 signal. The S2 signal is
observed only for the samples heated up to 100°ë. For
the mixture calcined at 200°ë, the S2 signal, attributed
to CB–catalyst contact, is not detectable. In parallel, on
the TG curve and in the range of 100–200°ë, we
observe a weight loss equal to 1.7%, whereas, in the
loose contact condition (absence of the S2 signal), this
weight loss is equal to 0.6%. Thus, the difference in the
weight losses at low temperature, due to contact condi-
tions, is 1.1% (corresponding to 22% of the total CB
weight in the sample). This latter can be related first to
The catalytic oxidation of carbon black was investi-
gated in the presence of CeO and Al O . The rate of
2
2
3
carbon black combustion increases considerably in
tight contact conditions. The CB oxidation process
starts by the elimination of the adsorbed hydrocarbons
leading to the formation of pores and to the increase of
the specific area with the calcination temperature. This
phenomenon would facilitate the adsorption of O mol-
2
ecules in order to oxidize the CB particulate. For tight
contact CB–catalyst mixtures, a new EPR signal, desig-
nated by S2, is observed. The appearance of the S2 sig-
nal indicates the formation of new paramagnetic spe-
cies consistent with localized paramagnetic spins on
the carbon particles and catalyst interface and can be
considered as a fingerprint of the contact between the
two solids. These new species increase the reactivity of
the effect of CeO as an oxygen storage catalyst and
2
second to the tight contact between CeO and CB sug-
2
gesting the first step in the mechanism of CB oxidation
in the presence of cerium oxide. Similar data have been
observed in such conditions and attributed to the high
reactivity of ceria–CB interface species [17]. In addi-
tion, the catalytic reaction continues at higher tempera-
tures taking advantage of heat diffusion related to the
partial oxidation of CB in the range of 100 and 200°C.
Therefore, the catalytic proprieties of cerium oxide
play an important role leading to an important shift in
the CB combustion temperature particularly in tight
contact conditions [17, 18]. Two general mechanisms
have been proposed to account for the diversified cata-
lytic effects of metals and oxides in carbon oxidation:
electron-transfer and oxygen-transfer mechanisms [19,
the tight contact CB + CeO mixtures in the catalytic
2
reaction of CB combustion. In addition, reduction of
4+
3+
Ce ions into Ce is evidenced simultaneously in the
catalytic oxidation process showing the participation of
ceria by means of its catalytic properties in the combus-
tion reaction of CB. These results may be considered an
important step in the elaboration of a general mecha-
nism explaining the catalytic oxidation process of die-
sel soot.
REFERENCES
2
0]. Several experimental facts have already permitted
1
2
. Abi-Aad, E., Cousin, R., Pruvost, C., Courcot, D.,
us to conclude in favor of oxygen-transfer mechanisms.
These facts are the following:
Noirot, R., Rigaudeau, C., andAboukais, A., Top. Catal.,
2
001, vols. 16/17, p. 263.
(
i) CeO is an active catalyst only in tight contact
2
. Heck, R.M. and Ferrauto, R.J., Catalytic Air Pollution
Control: Commercial Technology, New York: Van Nos-
trand Reinhold, 1995.
conditions with carbon black [16, 18],
(
ii) the formation of an interface reactive species
between ceria and CB [17],
3
4
5
. Rossignol, R. and Kappenstein, C., Int. J. Inorg. Mater.,
–
2
001, vol. 3, p. 77.
(
iii) the presence of O species on the ceria surface
2
. Neeft, J.P.A., Van Pruissen, O.P., Makkee, M., and Moul-
ijn, J.A., Appl. Catal., B, 1997, vol. 12, p. 21.
[13]. Thus, it is evident to conclude that paramagnetic
species responsible for the S2 signal can participate, at
very low temperature, in the mechanism of CB combus-
tion in the presence of cerium oxide. However, the pos-
sibility that cerium oxide participates in the combustion
reaction by means of its well-known catalytic proper-
ties towards oxidation reactions should not be omitted.
In fact, in both cases, loose and tight contacts, one can
observe the increase of the intensity of the EPR signal
relative to Ce3 ions with the increase of the reaction
temperature (Figs. 2a, 2b). These data clearly show the
. Neeft, J.P.A., Makkee, M., and Moulijn, J.A., Appl.
Catal., B, 1996, vol. 8, p. 57.
6. Trovarelli, A., Boara, M., Rocchini, E., De Leitenburg, C.,
and Dolcetti, G., J. Alloys Compd., 2001, vol. 584,
p. 323.
7. Faber, J., Seitz, M., and Mueller, M., J. Phys. Chem. Sol-
ids, 1976, vol. 37, p. 909.
+
8. Su, E.C. and Rotschild, W.G., J. Catal., 1986, vol. 99,
p. 506.
KINETICS AND CATALYSIS Vol. 48 No. 6 2007