produced diols, which were protected with DMP to afford
1,3-diol acetonides 11. Since the C(2)-acetals in 11a and 11b
had 13C chemical shifts of 100.75 and 98.00 and differences
between two 13C methyl signals in 11a and 11b were 0.01
and 12.42, they should have anti-acetonide and syn-acetonide
moieties, respectively.
Scheme 3
Scheme 2
With alcohol 10a in hand, we attempted an esterification
reaction of 10a and 12 accompanied by stereochemistry
inversion using Mitsunobu’s method.9 However, under
several standard conditions such as using Ph3P/DEAD or
Ph3P/DIAD as activators and THF or toluene as solvent, no
desired product 13 was isolated. In contrast, esterification
of 10a and 12 using Yamaguchi’s method13 provided ester
14 in good yield.
On the basis of the above observations, we adjusted our
synthetic plan by running stereochemistry inversion prior to
esterification. For this purpose the oxidation/reduction
strategy was considered. As demonstrated in Scheme 3, after
the aldehyde 9a was oxidized to the corresponding acid,
coupling with D-leucine-derived alcohol 15 was carried out
to afford ester 16. Dess-Martin oxidation of 16 followed
by NaBH4 reduction delivered protected syn-1,3-diol 17 as
a single product. Next, coupling of 17 with the acid 12
mediated with 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride and diisopro-
pylethylamine in benzene resulted in ester 18. The allyl
protecting group in 18 was removed via palladium chemis-
try14 to yield an acid, which was connected with a liberated
amine from tripeptide 19 to deliver amide 20. Finally,
sequential liberation of allyl ester and Fmoc-protected amine
moieties in 20 with Pd(Ph3P)4/NMA and diethylamine
followed by macrocyclization with HATU produced a cyclic
peptide in 30% yield, which was treated with 5% HF in
acetonitrile to furnish 115 in 83% yield.
MeOH)), which clearly ruled out the proposed structure for
palau’amide. For H NMR data, the major difference came
1
from the proton signals of C-4. Compound 1 has a chemical
shift of 3.16, whereas the reported one is 3.36, which implied
that the stereochemistry of its surrounding amino acid
residues were misassigned. Similar problems have often been
observed.16 In addition, the stereochemistry of C-37 might
also cause the above difference if it was misassigned.
The synthetic 1 displayed potent cytotoxicity against Hela,
A549, and BGC cell lines with IC50 values of 39, 19, and
26 nM, respectively. Although different tumor cells were
used, these data indicated that compound 1 has a similar
potency against tumor cells as palau’amide and implied that
(15) Selected data for 1: [R]20 ) +18.3 (c 0.15, MeOH); 1H NMR
D
(500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 7.65 (m, 1H), 7.55 (m, 1H), 7.24 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz,
1H), 7.15 (d, J ) 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.10 (t, J ) 6.8 Hz, 2H), 6.76 (m, 1H), 5.47
(dd, J ) 5.7, 9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (m, 1H), 4.93 (dd, J ) 10.1, 13.7 Hz, 1H),
4.90 (m, 1H), 4.51 (q, J ) 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (d, J ) 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.80
(m, 1H), 3.48 (m, 1H), 3.16 (s, 3H), 3.11 (d, J ) 18.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (s,
3H), 3.02 (dd, J ) 9.7, 14.7 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (m, 1H), 2.91 (s, 3H), 2.82 (m,
1H), 2.58 (m, 1H), 2.20 (t, J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (m, 2H), 1.93 (s, 3H),
1.86 (m, 1H), 1.84 (m, 1H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.79 (m, 1H), 1.58 (m, 2H),
1.53 (m, 2H), 1.49 (d, J ) 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.39 (m, 1H), 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.33
(m, 1H), 0.99 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J )
3.5 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (d, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.83 (d,
J ) 7.2 Hz, 3H); ESI-MS m/z 852 (M + H)+, 874 (M + Na)+; HRMS
calcd for C46H69N5O10SiNa (M + Na)+ requires 874.4937, found 874.4938.
(16) For recent examples, see: (a) Xu, Z.; Peng, Y.; Ye, T. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2821. (b) Peng, Y.; Pang, H.; Ye, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3781.
Unfortunately, both rotation ([R]20 ) +18.3 (c 0.15,
D
MeOH)) and NMR data for synthetic 1 were not in agreement
with those reported for palau’amide ([R]23 ) -22 (c 0.4,
D
(12) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Rogers, B.; Yang, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
3511.
(13) (a) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi, M.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989. (b) Hikota, M.; Sakurai, Y.; Horita,
K.; Yonemitsu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6367.
(14) Ciommer, M.; Kunz, H. Synlett 1991, 593.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 19, 2005
4239