J. D. Carballeira et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 951–962
961
3
0
potential using a 6-31G* basis set. The solvating
energies of the substrates were calculated with a con-
12. Nakamura, K. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1998, 5, 1129–
132.
13. Nakamura, K.; Yamanaka, R.; Matsuda, T.; Harada, T.
1
30;31
tinuos polarised model
using 6-31G* basis set. The
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 2659–2681.
4. Williamson, V. M.; Paquin, C. E. Mol. Gen. Gent. 1987,
09, 374–381.
5. Benach, J.; Atrian, S.; Gonzalez-Duarte, R.; Ladenstein,
R. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289, 335–355.
6. Jornwall, H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1970, 16, 25–40.
QSAR table for CoMFA included the steric and elec-
tronic field values, the stabilisation energy of enzyme
substrate complex, the solvating energy and the yield in
alcohol obtained for each carbonylic group. The elec-
trostatic and steric fields were calculated at each lattice
1
1
1
2
ꢁ
intersection grid of 2 A.
17. Jornwall, H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1977, 72, 425–442.
1
8. Vanni, A.; Pessione, E.; Anfossi, L.; Baggiani, C.; Cava-
leto, M.; Gulmini, M.; Giunta, C. J. Mol. Catal. B:
Enzym. 2001, 9, 283–291.
3
2;33
The partial least squares (PLS) analysis
obtain straight lines from the matrix. Leave one out
LOO) cross-validation method was used to select the
was used to
1
9. Korkhin, Y.; Kalb, A. J.; Peretz, M.; Bogin, O.; Burstein,
Y.; Fromlow, F. J. Mol. Catal. 1998, 278, 967–981.
(
number of main components of QSAR-3D analysis and
2
20. Theorell, H.; Chanwe, B. Acta Chem. Scand. 1951, 5,
127–1144.
to calculate the statistic parameters (q ).
1
2
1. Svensson, S.; H o€ o€ g, J. O.; Schneider, G. Y.; Sandalova, T.
J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 302, 441–453.
2. Waagen, V.; Partalli, V.; Hollingsaeter, I.; Huang, M. Sh.
S.; Anthonsen, T. Acta Chim. Scand. 1994, 48, 506–
510.
23. Molinari, F.; Gandolfi, R.; Villa, R.; Occhiata, E. G.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 3515–3520.
4. Shimizu, S.; Kataoka, M.; Katoh, M.; Morikawa, T.;
Miyoshi, T.; Yamada, H. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990,
The CoMFA model was generated using a no cross-
validation method and the number of components
indicated by the LOO validation. QSAR-3D/CoMFA
analysis was performed with the QSAR module of SY-
2
33
BYL 6.5 program. The calculations were performed
using GAUSSIAN-98.
34
2
2
374–2377.
2
2
5. Rodriguez, S.; Kayserm, M.; Stewart, J. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 1547–1555.
Acknowledgements
6. (a) Yasohara, Y.; Kizaki, N.; Hasegawa, J.; Takahashi, S.;
Wada, M.; Kataoka, M.; Shimizu, S. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 847–851; (b) Wada, M.; Kawabata,
H.; Yoshizumi, A.; Kataoka, M.; Nakamori, S.; Yaso-
hara, Y.; Kizaki, N.; Hasegawa, J.; Shimizu, S. J. Biosci.
Bioeng. 1999, 87, 144–148.
This paper was supported by the grants BIO2000-0747-
C05-01 and BQU 2001-1301, from Ministerio de Ciencia
y
Tecnolog ꢀı a of Spain. The authors gratefully
acknowledge the collaboration of Dr. Vega, Dr.
Martinez-Lagos and Mr. Quezada in the experimental
work.
2
7. (a) Martinez-Lagos, F.; del Campo, C.; Llama, E. F.;
Sinisterra, J. V. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 2002, 30, 895–
9
01; (b) Martinez-Lagos, F. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad
Complutense, Madrid, January 2003-04-11 104.
8. Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry: A
Textbook, 4th ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2001.
9. Stahl, S.; Ikemoto, N.; King, R.; Greasham, R.; Chartain,
M. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1999, 88, 495–499.
30. (a) Cramer, R. D., III; DePriest, S. A.; Patterson, D. E.;
Hecht, P. The Developing Practice of Comparative
Molecular Field Analysis. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design;
Kubinyi, H., Ed.; ESCOM: Leiden, 1993; pp 443–485; (b)
Klebe, G.; Abraham, U. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 70–
80.
2
2
References and notes
1
. (a) Wandrey, Ch.; Liese, A.; Kihumb, U. Org. Process
Res. Dev. 2000, 4, 286–290; (b) Dordick, S.; Clark, D.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 123–124; (c) Panke, S.;
Wubbolts, M. G. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002, 13, 111–
16.
. Ward, O. P.; Young, C. S. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999,
2, 482–493.
1
2
3
1
. Chartrain, M.; Greasham, R.; Moore, J.; Reider, P.;
Robinson, D.; Bucklan, D. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001,
31. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C.; Gould, I. R.; Merz,
K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.;
Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 5179–5197.
32. Miertus, S.; Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55,
117–129.
33. (a) Dunn, W. J.; Wold, S.; Edlund, U.; Hellberg, S.;
Gasteiger, J. Quant. Struct.–Act. Relat. 1984, 3, 131–137;
(b) Wold, S.; Ruhe, A.; Wold, H.; Dunn, W. J. I. SIAM J.
Sci. Stat. Comput. 1984, 5, 735–743; (c) Cramer, R. D.;
Bunce, J. D.; Patterson, D. E. Quant. Struct.–Act. Relat.
1988, 7, 18–25; (d) Wold, S.; Albano, C.; Dunn, W. J. I.;
Edlund, U.; Esbensen, W.; Geladi, P.; Hellberg, S.;
Johansson, E.; Lindberg, W.; Sj o€ str o€ m, M. Multivariate
Data Analysis in Chemistry. In Chemometrics: Mathemat-
ics and Statistics in Chemistry; Kowwalsky, B. R.,
Ed.; Reidel: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984; pp 17–
95.
1
1, 503–512.
4
5
. Nakamura, K.; Kawai, Y.; Nakajima, N.; Ohno, A. J.
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4778–4788.
. de Conti, R. M.; Porto, A. L. M.; Augusto, J.; Rodr ꢀı guez,
A. R.; Moran, P. J. S.; Manfio, G. P.; Marsaioli, A. J.
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 233–236.
6
7
8
9
. Barbieri, C.; Bossi, L.; DꢀArrigo, P.; Fantoni, G. P.; Servi,
S. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 415–421.
. Heidlas, J.; Engel, K.-H.; Tressi, R. Enzyme Microb.
Technol. 1991, 13, 817–821.
. Egri, G.; Kolbert, A.; Balint, J.; Fogassy, E.; Nov ꢀa k, L.;
Poppe, L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 271–283.
. Sih, Ch. J.; Chen, Ch. Sh. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1
984, 23, 570–578.
1
0. Shimizu, S.; Kataoka, M.; Kita, K. J. Mol. Catal. B:
Enzym. 1998, 5, 321–325.
1
1. Martinez, F.; del Campo, C.; Sinisterra, J. V.; Llama, E.
F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4651–4660.
34. SYBYL. Tripos Inc., 1699 South Handley Rd., St. Louis,
MO 63144, USA.