Hersh et al.
4
3
strates the potentially high stability of the P-O linkage,
temperature is most reasonably attributed to the pres-
ence of unpredictable amounts of acid in solution at this
epimerization stage. Once the heterocycle forms from the
rapidly inverting chlorophosphine, however, we propose
that the ring closure is essentially irreversible, and
monitoring of reactions at early reaction time has never
given any indication of different stereoselectivities.
4
4
1
8 only forms in low yields. Elimination of 2,3-pro-
panediol to give cyclic glycine derivatives such as 19
occurs under mild conditions.45 The final reaction in
Scheme 4 was reported to give cis-20 as the major product
at -5 °C (>2:1 cis/trans), but upon refluxing, trans-20
was obtained as the major product (1:5 cis/trans).46
As this survey makes clear, transfer of chirality from
the organic fragment to phosphorus is not observed
An alternative explanation for thermodynamic product
formation is intramolecular isomerization by inversion
at phosphorus; while there is no evidence for it in any of
these cases, it is not precluded. For instance, measured
barriers to phosphorus inversion are relatively low in a
(
14a ,b) or has not been sought (15-19) in most cases.
Only for 20 where moderate selectivity was observed and
of course for ephedrine (1a , Scheme 1) has diastereose-
lectivity been reported previously. The synthesis of
ephedrine-derived 1b,c has been reported to give a 1:1
mixture of cis and trans diastereomers initially, followed
by isomerization to give exclusive formation of the trans
49
50
1
,3,2-dioxaphospholane as well as in acylphosphines
where the electron-withdrawing acyl group allows anal-
ogy to the carboxylate and sulfonamide groups here.
Nevertheless, epimerization of 7 and 9 is always ac-
companied by decomposition with formation of the free
N-toluenesulfonyl amino acid, so the isomerization here
might most reasonably arise via P-O or P-N cleavage
followed by ring-closure. Regardless of mechanism, the
observed isomerization of 7b to 7a , and of the 65:35
mixture of 9a /9b back toward the 89:11 mixture, suggests
the cis diastereomer is indeed thermodynamically favored
for these N-sulfonyl-1,3,2-oxazaphospholidinones.
diastereomer 1a before oxidation or reaction with BH
3
as shown in Scheme 1. Both in this case and that of 20,
formation of the trans product is evidently favored
thermodynamically, in apparent contrast to the cis-
selectivity for N-toluenesulfonyl heterocycles 8, 9, 11, and
1
2. With the exception of this study, no attempts to
correlate steric effects with diastereoselectivity at phos-
phorus have been reported. Clearly, the correlation of cis/
trans ratio with steric bulk here suggests a mechanism
by which the cis product is favored: the toluenesulfonyl
moiety adopts a conformation that is predominantly
s-trans to the R-amino acid substituent, so that if P-O
bond formation occurs first due to the higher acidity of
the carboxylic acid, then subsequent nucleophilic attack
of nitrogen on phosphorus occurs so as to minimize the
steric interaction of the toluenesulfonyl and the phenyl-
phosphorus groups, leaving the larger R-amino acid
substituent and phenyl groups mutually cis. For the
isopropyl moiety, not only was a 10:1 cis:trans ratio
observed for the phenyl moiety of 9, but a 6:1 cis:trans
ratio was observed for the smaller ethyl moiety of 12.
For 11, the observed 56:38:7 ratio would be generated
by a 3:1 cis/trans ratio for each of the two ring-forming
steps pitting the isopropyl group against the two-carbon
bridge, a ratio which seems low given the size of this
group, but we have no explanation for this result.
One might suppose that the P-O-C(dO)R linkage,
which is rigorously a mixed anhydride formed from the
corresponding phosphorus acid chloride and carboxylic
acid would be only somewhat less reactive than a PCl
linkage, albeit with the potential for added instability due
to Arbuzov-type rearrangement due to the presence of
51
51-56
the P-O bond. In fact, acyclic analogues are known
and, consistent with the range of syntheses and reaction
conditions in Scheme 4, show that this can be a surpris-
ingly robust linkage. Interesting examples of both stable
and unstable mixed anhydrides are known in biological
55,56
systems. The former include pyrophosphate analogues
and aminoacyl-adenylate, the high-energy intermediate
used at the outset of protein biosynthesis to charge
57
tRNA. The latter unstable mixed anhydrides include,
perhaps surprisingly, amino acid-derived heterocycles
proposed to be present only as transient intermediates
58,59
in solvolysis reactions of acyclic phosphonamides (21),
This explanation for thermodynamic product formation
requires that the intermediate chlorophosphine be al-
lowed to epimerize, if (as seems likely) the initial attack
of carboxylate on phosphorus is not diastereoselective.
and pentavalent phosphorus intermediates proposed to
be present in a laboratory peptide oligomerization se-
quence (22) and perhaps in prebiotic polypeptide syn-
60
thesis and/or protein biosynthesis (23).
We have noticed that reaction of 6 with PCl
3
gives a
heterocycle that undergoes rapid epimerization in the
(
49) Hommer, H.; Gordillo, B. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat.
+
-
3
presence of Et NH Cl on the NMR time scale, but gives
Elem. 2002, 177, 465-470.
4
7
sharp peaks in the NMR when it is crystalline. A recent
paper similarly shows that HCl can catalyze chlorophos-
phine epimerization,48 and the epimerizations of both 1a
(50) Egan, W.; Mislow, K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1805-1806.
(
51) Peterson, L. K.; Burg, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2587-
2
591.
52) Bilevich, K. A.; Evdakov, V. P. Zh. Obsch. Khim. 1965, 35, 365-
368.
(
and 20 occur in the presence of trialkylammonium
salts.2
5,46
(53) Nifant’ev, E. E.; Fursenko, I. V. Usp. Khim. 1970, 39, 2187-
216.
(
The source of the variability in diastereoselec-
2
1
tivity for the synthesis of 9 as a function of solvent and
54) Hargis, J . H.; Mattson, G. A. J . Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1597-
602.
(
43) Nesmerova, L. I.; Gololobov, Y. G. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1981, 51,
663-1664 (Engl. 1417-1418).
44) Lai, P.; Wang, H.; Chen, R.; Liu, A.; Xu, J . Gaodeng Xuexiao
Huaxue Xuebao 1992, 13, 191-194.
45) Devedjiev, I.; Petrova, K.; Glavchev, I. Synth. Commun. 2000,
0, 4411-4415.
46) Totschnig, K.; Ellmerer-M u¨ ller, E. P.; Peringer, P. Phosphorus,
(55) Ahlmark, M.; Veps a¨ l a¨ inen, J .; Taipale, H.; Niemi, R.; J a¨ rvinen,
1
T. J . Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1473-1476.
(56) Ahlmark, M. J .; Vapsalalnen, J . J . Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5213.
(57) Voet, D.; Voet, J . G.; Pratt, C. W. Fundamentals of Biochemistry;
Wiley: New York, 2002.
(
(
3
(58) J acobsen, N. E.; Bartlett, P. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
1613-1619.
(
Sulfur Silicon 1996, 113, 173-177.
(
(
(59) J acobsen, N. E.; Bartlett, P. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105,
1619-1626.
47) Hersh, W. H. Unpublished results.
48) Humbel, S.; Bertrand, C.; Darcel, C.; Bauduin, C.; J uge, S.
(60) Fu, H.; Li, Z.-L.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Tu, G.-Z. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 291-295.
Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 420-427.
2
158 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 6, 2004