4
F. Nabeel et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 308 (2020) 113034
2.8. Determination of Stern-Volmer constant
2.87 ppm (l, l′) in HSP-TPE. Further signal peak at δ 12.3 ppm (proton
a) due to –COOH, has become almost negligible. These results con-
firmed the synthesis of HSP-TPE. The percentage of TPE grafted to HSP
was calculated by comparing the integral peaks of protons (A) of –CH3
groups of HSP core and integral peaks of the protons of TPE using the re-
lation ‘(STPE/19)/(SA/3) or (3STPE/19SA)’ and it was about 31%. The dif-
ferential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was conducted of HSP-TPE
copolymer and glass transition (Tg) was observed at temperature =
29.37 °C from DSC curve given in Fig. S7 (supporting information).
Another useful information regarding the sensitivity of the probe for
PA was obtained by plotting Stern-Volmer plot and determining the
Stern-Volmer constant (KSV) [28,50,51]. The plot is obtained as a func-
tion of [PA] using the following relationship:
Io=I ¼ 1 þ KSV ꢀ ½PAꢁ
where ‘Io’ is the initial fluorescence intensity when [PA] is zero and ‘I' is
the fluorescence intensity at any point.
3.2. Self-assembly and morphology of HSP-TPE aggregates
The self-assembled aggregates of HSPs (concentration = 1 mg/mL)
obtained by direct hydration [48,49] were subjected to TEM, DLS and
AFM spectroscopy which confirmed the vesicle configuration (Fig. S8
supporting information). The HSP-TPE self-assemble into vesicles
(Fig. 2) when water is introduced to their THF solution (5 μg × mL−1).
The TEM image of HSP-TPE (3:7 THF/Water v/v) (Fig. 2a) displays a ve-
sicular morphology with a clear dark boundary outside compared to the
internal pool. The average size of the spherical vesicles measured by DLS
is Ca. 712 nm with PDI of 0.38 (Fig. 2b). The AFM image (Fig. 2c) shows
spherical morphology of the HSP-TPE vesicles. The height profile
(Fig. 2d) shows an average diameter and height of HSP-TPE vesicles is
704 nm and 3.6 nm, respectively (diameter to height ratio is 1:196).
One reason for the large size vesicles is due to aggregation from direct
hydration method. Another possible reason is the increase in the hydro-
phobic character by the introduction of TPE molecules in the amphi-
philic hyperbranched HSPs which further increased hydrophobic
interaction between large-sized TPE molecules inside the vesicle.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of HSPs and HSP-TPEs
The synthetic route for the HSP-TPE copolymer is given in Scheme 3.
The monomers TPE (i.e., 2-(4-vinylphenyl)ethene-1,1,2-triyl)
tribenzene) was prepared by using Suzuki coupling reaction employing
catalyst (i.e., tetrakis-(triphenylphosphine) palladium) [31] whereas
TPE-OH was prepared by simple addition reaction using AIBN as an ini-
tiator. The TPE-OH was successfully grafted to carboxylic acid termi-
nated poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) arms of HSP-COOH by esterification.
The 1H NMR spectrum of HSP is given in Fig. S2 in supporting informa-
tion. When compared, 1H NMR peaks signals of the samples HSP-COOH
(DParm ≈ 10), TPE-OH and HSP-TPE in Fig. 1, spectral signals A-E and f-k
were from HBPO core and PEO arms respectively. The 1H NMR spectra
for HSP-COOH (Fig. 1) displayed new signals at δ 12.3 ppm from –
COOH, protons a, δ 4.39 ppm from protons f and δ 2.43 ppm from
CH2– (butanedioic anhydride) protons b, b' when compared to 1H
NMR for HSP (Fig. S2) confirmed successful conversion of –OH (end
group) of HSP to –COOH groups [52,53]. The conversion percentage of
–OH groups to –COOH was calculated to be approximately 77% by inte-
gral peaks comparison from A and b, b' using the relation ‘(Sb, b′/4)/(SA/
3) or (3Sb, b′/4SA)’. The 1H NMR spectra of HSP-TPE when compared
with HSP-COOH, new signals peaks are observed at δ 7.08 to 6.93 ppm
are assigned to protons from TPE. Moreover, signals at δ 4.03 (proton
c), 2.75 (proton d, d') and 2.67 (proton e) ppm are resultant of ester
linkage formation. Also the protons b, b' in HSP-COOH are shifted to
3.3. Photoluminescence of HSP-TPE aggregates
TPE molecules with multiple aryl groups are soluble in good solvents
where the aryl groups can rotate freely around the central stator linked
through single bonds are virtually non-luminescent. These intramolec-
ular free rotations are responsible for the conversion of photonic energy
into heat thus deactivates the excited states non-radioactively. How-
ever, in a poor solvent (i.e. water), it forms aggregates and becomes
AIE active due to restriction in intramolecular free rotation. In the cur-
rent case, aggregates of HSP-TPE at concentration = 5 μg × mL−1
were obtained by introducing water into their THF solution while vigor-
ous stirring. The electronic absorption from UV spectra and fluorescence
emission intensity from emission spectra of HSP-TPE aggregates in THF/
water (3:7 v/v) mixture is observed at peaks ~333 nm and 390 nm re-
spectively (Fig. S9 in supporting information).
Representatively, as shown in Fig. 3a, the HSP-TPE in solution form
show a weak PL at excitation wavelength λ = 333 nm, whereas, HSP-
TPE solutions in THF become photoluminescent when water in different
concentrations is used as precipitant. As the amount of water is in-
creased up to 70% in the THF solution, the value of PL is also increased
and an intense PL peak is recorded at ~390 nm under similar measure-
ment conditions. TPE unit in HSP-TPE polymer is hydrophobic in nature
therefore, the polymer must show aggregation in THF/water mixtures.
Consequently, HSP-TPE polymer is induced to turn on light by aggrega-
tion and is AIE active under high water content. The restricted intramo-
lecular rotation of TPE in HSP-TPE aggregates resulted in excimers
formation and become emissive by blockage of non-radiative channels.
By adding water more than 70% in THF solution of HSP-TPE, decreased
the PL intensity, this was caused by the low solubility of the polymer.
Another reason for this behavior is the decrease in the number of AIE-
active molecules per unit volume [1]. The PL intensity of the THF/
water aggregates with different amount of water is shown in
Fig. 3b and shows maximum PL intensity at 3:7 (v/v) of THF/water
mixture.
The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) of HSP-TPE aggregates (con-
Fig. 1. 1H NMR spectra of (a) HSP-COOH, (b) TPE-OH and (c) HSP-TPE in chloroform‑d.
centration = 5 μg × mL−1) were estimated in order to determine the