ChemCatChem
10.1002/cctc.201901742
FULL PAPER
shows that in the 7-15 bars pressure range no mass transfer limitations
occur being 10 bars sufficient to assure oxygen availability without
influencing the product distribution. After pressurizing, the temperature
was raised to 70ºC and the reaction mixture was stirred at approximately
Experimental Section
Catalyst series
4
00 rpm for 4 hours. Then the reactor was introduced into an ice bath and
The samples used in this study are selected from a series of previously
the reaction mixture was centrifuged and filtered. Afterwards, a sample
was taken and diluted before the test in an Agilent Infinity 1260 liquid
chromatograph equipped with a DAD detector and an Aminex HPX-87H
reported catalysts [16]. In a typical preparation, 5.10-4 M HAuCl
(Johnson
4
Matthey) aqueous solution is stirred together with a polyvinyl alcohol
solution (PVA, 1 wt.% in water), used as stabilizer, for 20 min at 600 rpm
2 4
300 mm × 7.8 mm column using 0.005 M H SO as eluent. The stability
(room temperature). Afterwards, an appropriate amount of 0.1 M freshly
was studied over the spent samples recovered from the post-reaction
mixture and dried at 120ºC overnight. The samples were used directly after
drying without any further treatment in a newly charged reactor with
HMF:Au:NaOH molar ratios kept constant. Conversion, selectivity and
yields are calculated after calibration using as reference commercial
samples, according to the following equations:
prepared NaBH solution was added to reduce the gold precursor. The
4
preformed colloid (2wt% Au nominal value) is immobilized on commercial
activated charcoal Darco© (Sigma Aldrich, 100 mesh). After ageing for 45
min, the resulting solid was recovered by centrifugation, filtered, dried and
finally calcined in static air at 300°C for 2 h. The gold particle size is
4
modified by wisely selecting different Au:PVA:NaBH ratios. This allows
selecting a series of catalysts s with mean particle size in the 4-40 nm
range. The selected catalysts, the Au:PVA:NaBH4 ratios used for their
preparation, their mean particle size and actual gold loadings are
summarized in table 1.
[
HMF]ꢃ−[HMF]I
Coꢂversioꢂ (%) =
x ꢄ00
(2)
(3)
(4)
[HMF]ꢃ
FDꢇꢈ mꢉꢊꢋ
ꢅꢆCA Selectivity (%) =
x ꢄ00
HMF mꢉꢊꢋI−HMF mꢉꢊꢋꢃ
2
High specific surface area (968 m /g) activated charcoal is used in this
ꢇꢉꢌꢍꢎꢏꢋꢐꢉꢌ
ꢅꢆCA Yield (%) =
x Selectivity
study with dominant microporosity. The activated charcoal presents low to
moderate acid character, which decrease with gold metal addition [35]. A
blank test of the reaction over this charcoal does not produce any products
but an adsorption of around 8 % of the initial HMF.
ꢑꢒꢒ
Acknowledgements
Characterization
Financial support has been obtained from the Spanish Ministerio
de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (ENE2017-82451-C3-3-
R) co-financed by E.U. FEDER funds.
Gold loadings were measured by using a Horiba Jobin Yvon ICP
spectrometer.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM/STEM) studies on particle size
and dispersion of the catalysts were performed on a FEI TECNAI F20
microscope operating at 200keV. The average gold particle size was
estimated based on surface distribution calculations as shown in equation
Keywords: HMF oxidation, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, gold
catalysts, size/selectivity dependence
1:
References
n
1
n
1
ꢀ
푖
ꢁ
푖
∑
∑
D
D
푣푖
푣푖
퐷 [3,2] =
(1)
[1]
A. Gandini, A. J. D. Silvestre, C. P. Neto, A. F. Sousa, M. Gomes, J.
Polymer Scie.: A: Polymer Chem., 2009, 47, 295–298;
M. Gomes, A. Gandini, A. J. D. Silvestre, B. Reis, J. Polymer Scie.: A:
Polymer Chem., 2011, 49, 3759–3768
where D
i
is the geometric diameter of the ith particle, and v
i
the number of
[
2]
particles with this diameter. The particle size distribution is evaluated using
over 200 particles for every sample.
[
[
3]
4]
W. Partenheimer, V. V. Grushin, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 102–111.
L. Ardemani, G. Cibin, A. J. Dent, M. A. Isaacs, G. Kyriakou, A.F. Lee,
C. M. A. Parlett, S. A. Parryb , K. Wilson Chem. Sci, 2015, 6, 4940–4945.
A.S. Amarasekara, D. Green, E. McMillan, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9,
286–288.
XPS measurements were carried out on SPECS spectrometer equipped
with PHOIBOS 150 MCD analyzer working with fixed pass energy of 40
eV and 0.1 eV resolution for the studied zones. As monochromatic source
of radiation Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV) was used working on 250W and
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
S. E. Davis, L. R. Houk, E. C. Tamargo, A. K. Datye, R. J. Davis, Catal.
Today, 2011, 160, 55-60.
1
2.5 kV voltage. The analytical chamber operates at ultra-high vacuum at
−
10
around 10 mbar pressure. Prior use the samples were pressed into a
thin disk. The XPS spectra were recorded at room temperature and the
binding energy was calibrated on C1s at 284,6 eV with an uncertainty ±0.2
eV.
M. Ventura, A. Dibenedetto, M. Aresta, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2018, 470, 11–
21.
S. Albonetti, A. Lolli, V. Morandi, A. Migliori, C. Lucarelli, F. Cavani, Appl.
Catal. B: Environm., 2015, 163, 520-530.
[
[
[
9]
M. Boronat, A. Corma, Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 8538–8546.
10] N. López, J. K. Nørskov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11262-11263.
11] T. Jiang, D. J.Mowbray, S. Dobrin, H. Falsig, B. Hvolbæk, T. Bligaard, J.
K. Nørskov, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 10548-10553.
Catalytic tests
The oxidation of HMF was carried out in a 100 mL volume autoclave
reactor, provided with mechanical stirrer and temperature/pressure
controllers. In a typical experiment, the reactor was charged with an
aqueous solution of HMF (approx. 25 mL, 0.08 M), the necessary amount
of NaOH, and the catalyst in the HMF:Au:NaOH ratio of 1:0.01:2. Before
[
[
[
12] J.A. van Bokhoven, C. Louis, J. T. Miller, M. Tromp, O. V. Safonova, P.
Glatzel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 4651 –4654.
13] A.P. Woodham, G. Meijer, A. Fielicke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135,
1
727-1730.
14] P.Fristrup, L. Bahn Johansen, C.H. Christensen, Chem. Commun., 2008,
750–2752
test, the reactor was purged twice with pure O
pressurized to 10 bars. The variation of the oxygen pressure (Figure SI. 1)
2
(10 bar) and finally
2
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.