Oxidation Pathways for (FulValendiyl)dirhodium
Organometallics, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2006 1655
through ion-pairing effects are more widely known. For
example, with cathodic processes involving product anions, the
one-electron product is thermodynamically destabilized under
stronger ion-pairing conditions typified by replacement of
tetraalkylammonium ions by alkali metal ions.6 An essentially
“mirror image” effect7 is expected for anodic processes involv-
ing product cations if “traditional” anions such as [PF6]-8 are
replaced by strong ion-pairing anions such as halide ions.
However, the greatly increased nucleophilicities of the latter
often lead to unwanted side reactions. A new expedient to this
strategy has been recently introduced. Weakly coordinating
In contrast to complexes 1 and 2, significant structural
changes are not likely to accompany the oxidation of Rh2Fv-
(COD)2, 3, COD ) 1,5-cyclooctadiene. In this case, steric
factors prevent formation of a metal-metal bond and allow
retention of a transoid configuration of the Rh(COD) moieties
in all three oxidation states of 3. This causes the ∆E1/2 value to
be positive, albeit small, even in traditional electrolyte solutions.
As shown below, replacement of [PF6]- by a WCA leads to an
increase in ∆E1/2 (i.e., an increasingly positiVe value), stabilizing
the intermediate 3+ and making possible the recording of its
ESR spectrum. To complete the manipulation of the EE
responses of complexes 1-3, solvation effects were used to
induce a negatiVe change in ∆E1/2 sufficient to achieve potential
inVersion, as manifested in a single two-electron cyclic volta-
mmetry (CV) wave for the process 3/32+. This family of three
dirhodium complexes therefore provides a model example of
how solvent and electrolyte effects can be exploited in an
integrated manner to achieve desired thermodynamic goals in
multielectron anodic reactions.
anions (WCA)9 having highly dispersed negative charges (e.g.,
[B(C6F5)4]-, TFAB,10-12 and [B(C6H3(CF3)2)4]-, BArF24
)
13
provide the desired weak nucleophilicity in addition to being
much more weakly ion-pairing than the traditional anions in
low-polarity solvents.12 These properties make possible the
manipulation of anodic ∆E1/2 values by ion-pairing effects with
little concern about nucleophile-induced follow-up reactions.
A systematic study of media containing halide, traditional, or
weakly coordinating anions has provided an integrated model
for the manipulation of ∆E1/2 values in lower-polarity sol-
vents.7,11 Here we give an example of how this integrated
approach to medium effects makes possible either two separate
one-electron processes or a single (inverted) two-electron
process for the oxidation of compounds having a fulvalene-
type bridge between two Rh atoms.
Two of these complexes, namely, Rh2Fv(CO)4, 1, and Rh2-
Fv(CO)2(µ-dppm), 2 [Fv ) fulvalenediyl, C10H8; dppm ) bis-
(diphenylphosphino)methane], were shown earlier to have single
two-electron oxidations14 in which potential inversion is linked
to formation of strong Rh-Rh bonds in the dications. In neither
case was the radical monocation (1+ or 2+) detected, hindering
judgment on the question of whether the metal-metal bond
forms in the first or second oxidation process. The fact that the
reported values14 of ∆E1/2 were not very large in CH2Cl2/[NBu4]-
[PF6] (-140 mV for 1 and -10 mV for 2) suggested to us that
these compounds might have positiVe ∆E1/2 values in less ion-
pairing media, hopefully allowing direct characterization of the
monocations 1+ and 2+. This expectation was realized by
electrochemistry and spectroscopy, as shown below.
Experimental Section
General Procedures. The dirhodium compounds 1-3 and the
dicobalt compound 4 were prepared by literature methods.14,15 All
procedures were carried out under dinitrogen using rigorous Schlenk
conditions, except for electrochemical experiments, which were
carried out in a Vacuum Atmospheres drybox. Dichloromethane
was twice distilled from CaH2, the second time under static vacuum.
Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate was prepared by me-
tathesis of [NBu4]I with [NH4][PF6] in acetone/water, recrystallized
three times from ethanol, and dried under vacuum. [NBu4][B(C6F5)4]
was prepared by metathesis of [NBu4]Br with Li[B(C6F5)4]‚nOEt2
(Boulder Scientific Co.) in methanol and recrystallized at least twice
from CH2Cl2/hexane. A detailed description of the metathesis
procedure is available.12 Na[B(C6H3(CF3)2)4] (Boulder Scientific
Co.) was used as received. The tetraethylammonium and tetrabut-
ylammonium salts of [B(C6H3(CF3)2)4]- were prepared by similar
metatheses and recrystallizations. [FeCp2][B(C6F5)4] was prepared
by oxidation of sublimed ferrocene with anhydrous FeCl3, followed
by treatment with Li[B(C6F5)4]‚nOEt2, analogous to the literature
preparation of the [PF6]- analogue.16b,17 A standard three-electrode
configuration was used for voltammetry and coulometry experi-
ments. In the case of bulk electrolyses a three-compartment cell
was used in which the working and auxiliary compartments were
separated by two fine frits to minimize mixing of the solutions.
The experimental reference electrode was a AgCl-coated Ag wire
prepared by anodic electrolysis of the wire in 1 M HCl. All
potentials in this paper are referred, however, to the ferrocene/
ferrocenium reference couple.16 This was accomplished by adding
either ferrocene or decamethylferrocene to the solution as an internal
standard at an appropriate time in the experiment. When deca-
methylferrocene was used as the working internal reference,
(6) Although ion-pairing shifts both the A/B and B/C couples to more
positive potentials, the effect on the latter is stronger owing to the increased
electrostatic effect in the dianion. Early work in this area is nicely
summarized in (a) Swarc, M.; Jagur-Grodzinski, J. In Ions and Ion Pairs
in Organic Reactions; Swarc, M., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York,
1974; Vol. 2, Chapter 1. Other representative studies: (b) Levin, G.; Swarc,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 4211. (c) Smith, W. H.; Bard, A. J. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 1977, 76, 19 [cyclooctatetraene; see also ref 6f]. (d)
Bo¨hm, A.; Meerholz, K.; Heinze, J.; Mu¨llen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 688 (polyarenes). (e) Himeno, S.; Takamoto, M.; Ueda, T. J.
Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 485, 49 (keggin-type complexes). (f) Baik,
M.-H.; Schauer, C. K.; Ziegler, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11167
(density functional theory of ion-pairing interactions). See also ref 2d.
(7) Barrie`re, F.; Geiger, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press. See ref 11
for preliminary communication of this work.
(8) We include in this category the anions most commonly used in
nonaqueous solutions such as [BF4]-, [ClO4]-, and [CF3SO3]-.
(9) (a) Beck, W.; Su¨nkel, K. H. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1405. (b) Strauss,
S. H. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 927. (b) Reed, C. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998,
31, 133. (d) Chen, E. Y.-K.; Marks, T. J. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1391. (e)
Krossing, I.; Raabe, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2066.
(10) LeSuer, R. J.; Geiger, W. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 38, 248.
(11) Barrie`re, F.; Camire, N.; Geiger, W. E.; Mueller-Westerhoff, U.
T.; Sanders, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7262.
(12) LeSuer, R. J.; Buttolph, C.; Geiger, W. E. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76,
6395.
(13) Hill, M. G.; Lamanna, W. M.; Mann, K. R. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30,
4687.
(14) Chin, T. T.; Geiger, W. E.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 5002.
(15) Rausch, M. D.; Spink, W. C.; Conway, B. G.; Rogers, R. D.;
Atwood, J. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 383, 227.
(16) (a) Gritzner, G.; Kuta, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1984, 56, 461. (b)
Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 877.