alcohol 16 with TBSCl affords the silyl ether 17 and the
first fragment needed for cross-coupling. The (E)-vinylstan-
nane 20 was prepared via the hydrostannylation of TBS-
protected propargyl alcohol 19 (Scheme 2). Despite extensive
Scheme 3. Fragment Assembly and Reduction
Scheme 2. Preparation of the Vinylstannane
was then protected as the bis silyl ether 24 (Scheme 4).
Double deprotonation of the imidazole C2 positions with
n-BuLi and trapping with TsN3 provides the bis azide 25 in
71% yield (Scheme 4).16 Deprotection of the silyl ethers
occurred on treatment with TBAF leading to the formation
of the expected diol 26. At this stage the introduction of the
remaining nitrogen and the two dibromopyrrole moieties was
all that remained to complete the synthesis. Strategically,
one might envision accomplishing this task by conversion
of the primary alcohols to the primary amines via the azide
or phthalimide, followed by acylation. However, we had
previously demonstrated that the pyrrolecarboxamide moiety
could be introduced directly as a pyrrolehydantoin via a Pd-
catalyzed allylic substitution reaction.21,22 Therefore, it was
not difficult to envision using a similar type of substrate as
a nucleophile in a Mitsunobu reaction. Diol 26 was subjected
to a double Mitsunobu reaction with the dibromopyrrolehy-
dantoin derivative 27 leading to 28 (Scheme 4).23 In order
to prevent competitive formation of the iminophosphorane
by reaction of the triphenylphosphine with the azide moieties,
triphenylphosphine was reacted with DIAD prior to intro-
duction of the diol.24 In this way the full carbon skeleton of
nagelamide D was accessed, all that remained to complete
the synthesis was deprotection and azide reduction. Exposure
of 28 to aqueous sodium hydroxide led to hydrolysis of the
ureas, providing the pyrrolecarboxamide 29. Initial attempts
were made to complete the sequence by reduction of the
azides with NaBH4, which proceeded uneventfully; however
experimentation with conditions and protecting groups,
mixtures of the R- and ꢀ-isomers (∼3:2) were always
obtained, and unfortunately the regioselectivity of the hy-
drostannylation reaction could not be improved. The regio-
chemistry and the stereochemistry of this reaction were
determined by the magnitudes of the vicinal coupling
constants and Sn/H coupling constants. The imidazole-
substituted propargyl alcohol 19 in turn was prepared via a
Sonogashira reaction between 4-iodoimidazole 18 and TBS-
protected propargyl alcohol.16
With the requisite two fragments in hand we began to
investigate the cross-coupling reaction, and ultimately de-
termined that the fluoride-mediated Stille cross-coupling
conditions reported quite recently by Baldwin and co-workers
provided the bis vinylimidazole 22 in good yield after
treatment with TBAF to complete the partial desilylation.19
At this point, catalytic hydrogenation led to saturation of
both double bonds to give the diol 23 (Scheme 3),20 which
(9) (a) Endo, T.; Tsuda, M.; Okada, T.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Shima, H.;
Kikuchi, K.; Mikami, Y.; Fromont, J.; Kobayashi, J. J. Nat. Prod. 2004,
67, 1262. (b) Araki, A.; Tsuda, M.; Kubota, T.; Mikami, Y.; Fromont, J.;
Kobayashi, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2369. (c) Araki, A.; Kubota, T.; Tsuda,
M.; Mikami, Y.; Fromont, J.; Kobayashi, J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2099. (d)
Kubota, T.; Araki, A.; Ito, J.; Mikami, Y.; Fromont, J.; Kobayashi, J. i.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 10810.
(10) Arndt, H.-D.; Riedrich, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4785.
(11) He, Y.; Du, H.; Sivappa, R.; Lovely, C. J. Synlett 2006, 965.
(12) O’Malley, D. P.; Li, K.; Maue, M.; Zografos, A. L.; Baran, P. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4762.
(20) Attempts to perform the reduction on the TBS-protected diol only
resulted in saturation of the more substituted double bond. Although not
useful in the present context, this chemoselectivity will be useful en route
to the related nagelamide A (5).
(21) Krishnamoorthy, P.; Sivappa, R.; Du, H.; Lovely, C. J. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 10555. We have also investigated the use of the parent
pyrrolehydantoin in the Mitsunobu reaction and will describe these results
elsewhere. For related systems employing the Pd-catalyzed substitution of
(13) Koswatta, P. B.; Sivappa, R.; Dias, H. V. R.; Lovely, C. J. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 5055.
(14) Tonsiengsom, S. PhD Dissertation, Oregon State University
(Corvallis), 2006.
(15) Lovely, C. J.; Du, H.; Sivappa, R.; Bhandari, M. K.; He, Y.; Dias,
H. V. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3741.
allylic systems, see: Trost, B. M.; Dong, G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2357
(22) Papadopoulos, E. P. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 351
(23) For the preparation of compound 27, see: Spoering, R. M. PhD
Dissertation, Harvard University (Boston), 2005.
(24) Sakairi, N.; Hayashida, M.; Kuzuhara, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 2871.
.
(16) Lindel, T.; Hochguertel, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2806.
(17) Chen, Y.; Ekanayake, V.; Lovely, C. J. Heterocycles 2007, 74, 873.
(18) Comins, D.; Meyers, A. I. Synthesis 1978, 403.
(19) Mee, S. P. H.; Lee, V.; Baldwin, J. E. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11,
3294.
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 7, 2009
1537