5778
F. Baycan Koyuncu et al. / Polymer 52 (2011) 5772e5779
Fig. 7. Electrochromic switching, optical absorbance monitored at 522 and 950 nm for poly(SNSC-BSe) film between 0 and 1.1 V.
(DT%) of poly(SNSC-BSe) between the neutral (at_0 V) and oxidized
Appendix. Supplementary material
states (at 1.1 V) were found to be 29% for 522 nm and 51% for
950 nm (Fig. 7). Besides, the oxidation and reduction response
times were measured to be 1.4 and 0.8 s for poly(SNSC-BSe).
Optical activity of the co-polymer film was retained by 94.6% even
after 1000 cycles of operation. Finally, poly(SNSC-BSe) exhibits
reversible redox behavior, fast response time, high resistance to
over oxidation, and especially high contrast ratio at the NIR region
and can thus be useful for electrochromic applications. On the other
hand, the coloration efficiency (CE) was calculated by using
Supplementary material associated with this article can be
References
[1] (a) Chiang CK, Park YW, Heeger AJ, Shirakawa H, Louis EJ, MacDiarmid AG. J
Chem Phys 1978;69:5098e104;
(b) Skotheim TA, Reynolds JR. Handbook of Conducting polymers. CRC Pres-
Taylor Francis; 2006;
(c) Roncali J. Chem Rev 1997;97:173e206.
CE ¼
D
OD/Qd and
D
OD ¼ log (Tcolored/Tbleached), where Qd is the
injected/ejected charge between neutral and oxidized states, Tcol-
ored and Tbleached are the transmittance in the oxidized and neutral
states, respectively. Using this equation, CE of poly(SNSC-BSe) was
measured to be 274 cm2 Cꢁ1 by chronoamperometry, while
switching the co-polymer film between oxidized and reduced
states. The results clearly show that both coloration efficiency of
poly(SNSC-BSe) is about a half times greater and the response time
is much better than that of PTSeT at the same wavelength (950 nm)
[15]. Based on foregoing results, it can be easily seen that the pol-
y(SNSC-BSe) of has much better electrochromic performance then
that of the thiophene analogue.
[2] Havinga EE, Tenhoeve W, Wynberg H. Synth Met 1993;55:299e306.
[3] Cho MJ, Choi DH, Sullivan PA, Akelaitis AJP, Dalton LR. Prog Poly Sci 2008;33:
1013e58.
[4] Agrawal A, Jeneche SA. Chem Matter 1993;5:633e40.
[5] (a) Holmes AB, Burroughes JH, Bradley DDC, Brown AR, Marks RN, MacKay K,
Friend RH, Burn PL. Nature 1990;347:539e41;
(b) Akcelrud L. Prog Polym Sci 2003;28:875e962;
(c) Cheng YJ, Yang SH, Hsu CS. Chem Rev 2009;109:5868e923;
(d) Grimsdale AC, Chan KL, Martin RE, Jokisz PG, Holmes AB. Chem Rev 2009;
109:897e1091;
(e) Chen S, Deng L, Peng L, Xie L, Fan Q, Huang W. Adv Mater 2010;22:
5227e39;
(f) Kraft A, Grimsdale AC, Holmes AB. Angew Chem Int Ed 1998;37:202e428.
[6] (a) Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen JC, Wudl F, Heeger AJ. Science 1995;270:1789e91;
(b) Chen L, Godovsky D, Inganas O, Hummelen JC, Janssen RAJ, Svensson M,
Andersson MR. Adv Mater 2000;12:1367e70;
4. Conclusion
(c) Cravino A, Zerza G, Maggini M, Buchella S, Svensson M, Andersson MR,
Neugebauer H, Brabec CJ, Sariciftci NS. Monatshefte für Chemie 2003;134:
519e27;
(d) Colladet K, Fourier S, Cleij TJ, Lutsen L, Gellan J, Vanderzande D, Nguyen LH,
Neugebauer H, Sariciftci NS, Aguierre A, Janssen G, Goovaerts E. Macromole-
cules 2007;40:65e72;
(e) Microyannidis JA, Stylianakis MM, Sharma GD, Balraju P, Roy MS. J Phys
Chem C 2009;113:7904e12;
(f) Mikroyannidis JA, Kabanakis AN, Balraju P, Sharma GD. Macromolecules
2010;43:5544e53;
Herein, the conjugated donor-acceptor co-polymer based on 3-
(2,5-di-2-thienyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-9-ethyl-9H-carbazole
(SNSC-
donor) with 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazole (BSe-acceptor) unit, pol-
y(SNSC-BSe), was synthesized via Kumada coupling reaction.
FTeIR, 1H NMR spectroscopy results used for the structural char-
acterization. The co-polymer exhibits moderate solubility in
organic solvents, thermally stable, low molecular weight and PDI
value. Poly(SNSC-BSe) film was prepared via spray-casting process
onto transparent ITO/glass surface to give very stable electro-
chromic material with reversible electrochemical oxidation, low
driving voltage, high coloration efficiency, high redox stability and
(g) Zhang Q, Cirpan A, Russell TP, Emrick T. Macromolecules 2009;42:
1079e82;
(h) Li Z, Zhang Y, Tsang S-W, Du J, Tao Y, Ding J. J Phys Chem C 2011;115:
18002e9.
[7] (a) Morana M, Koers P, Aldauf C, Koppe M, Muehlbacher D, Denk P, Scharber A,
Waller D, Brabec C. Adv Funct Mater 2007;17:3274e83;
(b) Champion RD, Cheng K-F, Pai C-L, Chen W-C, Jeneckhe SA. Macromol Rapid
Commun 2005;26:1835e40.
[8] Sonmez G, Sonmez HB. J Mater Chem 2006;16:2473e7.
[9] (a) Panero S, Prosperi P, Klaptse B, Scrosati B. Electrochim Acta 1986;31:
1597e600;
(b) Kaneto K, Yoshino K, Inuishi Y. Jpn J Appl Phys Part 2 1983;22:567e8;
(c) Yamamoto T. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 1981;4:187e8.
[10] (a) Beaujuge PM, Reynolds JR. Chem Rev 2010;110:268e320;
(b) Amb CM, Dyer AL, Reynolds JR. Chem Mater 2011;23:397e415;
(c) Sonmez G, Sonmez HB, Shen CKF, Jost RW, Rubin Y, Wudl F. Macromole-
cules 2005;38:669e75;
especially a high contrast ratio in the NIR region (
D
T ¼ 51% at
950 nm). Due to having high contrast change in the NIR region, the
poly(SNSC-BSe) co-polymer may be one of the most important
materials for the NIR application. On the other hand, poly(SNSC-
BSe) may be one of the most important materials in opto-electronic
application such as organic solar cells (OSCs) and organic light
emitting diodes (OLEDs) due to excelent electrochemical and
optical properties.
(d) Schwendeman Hickman I, Hickman R, Sonmez G, Schottland P, Zong K,
Welsh DM, Reynolds JR. Chem Mater 2002;14:3118e22;
(e) Durmus A, Gunbas GE, Camurlu P, Toppare L. Chem Commun 2007;31:
3246e8;
Acknowledgments
(f) Liou GS, Hsiao SH, Huang NK, Yang YL. Macromolecules 2006;39:5337e46;
(g) Wang H-M, Hsiao SH, Liou GS, Sun CH. J Poly Sci Part A Poly Chem 2010;
48:4775e89;
We gratefully acknowledge the supports from Scientific and
Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, project #: 109T516)
for financial support.
(h) Li X-G, Wang H-Y, Huang M-G. Macromolecules 2007;40:1489e96.