3076
S. Hajra et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 3073–3077
solution of substrate 4a was treated with NBS
(1.5 equiv) in the presence of the Yb(OTf)3 catalyst
(15 mol %) at rt, it gave the desired bromomethoxycar-
bonyl compounds in 52% yield (entry 1). The iodometh-
oxylation of 4a under the same reaction conditions using
NIS instead of NBS provided the iodomethoxycarbonyl
compounds in 87% yield with moderate diastereoselec-
tivity (entry 2). The stereochemistry of the major isomer
8a was assigned by analogy with the above halohydr-
oxylation reactions. The compound 8a could easily be
transformed into the N-protected syn-b-methoxy-
phenylalanine, the unusual amino acid component of
cyclomarins.14,6a The electron-rich cinnamoyl substrates
4b, 4c and the b-(2-naphthyl)enoyl substrate 4h re-
sponded to the bromomethoxylation with moderate to
good diastereoselectivities (entries 3, 4 and 7) and the
more electron-rich cinnamoyl substrates 4d and 4e pre-
ferred to undergo iodomethoxylation with NIS (entries
5 and 6). Similar to the halohydroxylation, the elec-
tron-deficient cinnamoyl substrates 4i and 4j did not un-
dergo any halomethoxylation even under more vigorous
reaction conditions. We also studied the halomethoxyla-
tion of alkenoyl substrates 4k and 4l under the same
reaction conditions, which showed 100% regioselectiv-
ity, with moderate diastereoselectivity, in good yields.
pur and A.K. thanks CSIR, New Delhi for their
fellowships.
References and notes
1. (a) House, H. O. Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd ed.;
W.A. Benjamin: Menlo Park, CA, 1972, p 432; (b) March,
J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.; Wiley: New
York, 1992, 815; (c) Carey, F.; Sundberg, R. Advanced
Organic Chemistry, Part B, 4th ed.; Plenum: New
York, 2001, p 203.
2. UllmannÕs Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 6th ed.;
Electronic Release, 1998 Cabanal-Duvillard, I.; Berrier, J.
F.; Royer, J.; Husson, H. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
5181.
3. (a) El-Qisairi, A.; Hamed, O.; Henry, P. M. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 2790; (b) Dewkar, G. K.; Srinivasarao, V. N.;
Sudalai, A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4501; (c) Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Semmelhack,
M. F., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 4, pp 344–347.
4. (a) Ohno, M.; Otsuka, M. In Recent Progress in Chemical
Synthesis of Antibiotics; Lukas, G., Ohno, M., Eds.;
Springer: New York, 1990; (b) Dong, L.; Miller, M. J. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4759; (c) Evans, D. A.; Ellman, J. A.;
De Vries, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8912; (d)
Evans, D. A.; Weber, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
7151; (e) Tseng, T. C.; Wu, M. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 1633; (f) Nicolaou, K. C.; Kataoka, T. C.;
Caulfield, T.; Kumazawa, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
7910; (g) Sheehan, J. C.; Mania, D.; Nakamura, S.; Stock,
J. A.; Maeda, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 462; (h)
Boger, D. L.; Memezes, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
4331.
In summary, we have developed a Lewis acid catalyzed
asymmetric halohydrination, (halohydroxylation as well
as halomethoxylation) of chiral a,b-unsaturated car-
bonyl compounds with NXS (X = Br, I) as the halogen
source. Regio- and anti-selectivity of 100% and moder-
ate to good diastereoselectivity with good yields was
observed when bornanesultam was used as the chiral
auxiliary. Most of the metal halides and acetates did
not catalyze the halohydrin reactions, but metal triflates
showed good catalytic activity for the halohydrination
of a,b-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Among the
metal triflates, Yb(OTf)3 was found to be the best cata-
lyst. Alkenoyl, cinnamoyl and moderately electron-rich
cinnamoyl substrates smoothly underwent the Yb(OTf)3
catalyzed bromohydrin reactions with NBS whilst the
more electron-rich cinnamoyl substrates preferred to un-
dergo iodohydrin reactions with NIS. The cinnamoyl
substrates possessing electron-withdrawing substituents
on the aromatic ring did not respond to the Lewis acid
catalyzed halohydrin reaction with either NCS, NBS
or NIS. This methodology offers an alternative method
for the synthesis of chiral a-halo-b-hydroxy/methoxy
carboxylic acid derivatives using easily available N-halo-
succinimide as the halogen source. A better understand-
ing of Lewis acid catalyzed halohydrin reactions may
provide a catalytic and enantioselective method for the
halohydrination of olefins. We are currently attempting
to improve the diastereoselectivity of this process and we
are applying this concept to other catalytic 1,2-halo
functionalizations of olefins.
5. (a) Ishihara, T.; Mima, K.; Konno, T.; Yamanaka, H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3493; (b) Guindon, Y.;
Rancourt, J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6554; (c) Nagano,
H.; Kuno, Y.; Omori, Y.; Iguchi, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin. Trans. 1 1996, 389; (d) Hart, D. J.; Krishnamur-
thy, R. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4457.
6. (a) Hajra, S.; Karmakar, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
3185; (b) Hajra, S.; Karmakar, A.; Bhowmick, M.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2279.
7. Smietna, M.; Gouverneur, V. Mioskowski Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 193.
8. (a) McKennon, M. J.; Meyers, A. I. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 3568; (b) Evans, D. A.; Mathre, D. J.; Scott, W. L.
J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1830; (c) Evans, D. A.; Dow,
R. L.; Shih, T. L.; Takacs, J. M.; Zahler, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 5290.
9. Pure compounds 2a and 2a0 were fully characterized and
their stereochemistry was assigned in our earlier report.6b
10. The dr of 3a/3a0 was also the same as for the halohydrins.
It was determined by 13C NMR spectral analysis because
no separated 1H NMR signal was found for the diaste-
1
reomers of dibromocarbonyl compound 3a/3a0 in the H
NMR spectrum in CDCl3.
11. Representative spectral data of 2b: H NMR (200 MHz,
1
CDCl3) d 7.35 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J = 6.7 Hz,
2H), 5.88 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H),
4.49–4.45 (m, 1H), 4.28–4.23 (m, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.71–
2.25 (m, 2H), 0.93 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (d,J = 7.0 Hz,
3H);13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3) d 168.9, 159.6, 153.0,
131.3, 128.4, 113.7, 74.2, 63.5, 58.3, 55.1, 45.1, 28.0, 17.6,
14.7. 2b0: 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.36 (d, J =
6.7 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 6.00 (d, J = 7.5 Hz,
1H), 5.10 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.39 (m, 1H), 4.26–
4.17 (m, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.45–2.20 (m, 1H), 0.89 (d,
Acknowledgements
We thank DST, New Delhi and CSIR, New Delhi for
providing financial support. M.B. thanks IIT, Kharag-