Action of diatomaceous earth on cuticle of A. siro
hydrocarbon of A. siro.15 Although the function of this
compound is unknown, it has been suggested that it
may serve as a solvent for the semiochemicals such
as neral and neryl formate that are produced by some
mite species.16
As in a previous study,12 there were no obvious
signs of puncture marks, gouges or other signs of overt
damage caused by the DE. However, it is possible
that the thin epicuticle may have been uniformly worn
down or removed, and this would not have been
obvious unless viewed as a section. Further work is
needed to confirm any abrasive action of the DE,
using thin-layer electron microscopy (TEM).
However, this study does raise questions about the
role of tridecane. With the lack of other evidence to the
contrary, and regardless of its volatile nature, it may
play a role as a waterproofing agent. This is further
supported by the fact that the pheromone 2-hydroxy-
6-methylbenzaldehyde,16,20 which was present in
greater quantities in the mites, was only absorbed
at 1.5–10% as much as tridecane. If tridecane does
have this role, then it could be concluded that DE has
a similar mode of action against mites as hypothesised
for insects. More in-depth studies are needed to
support these results.
In the present study, three major volatile, non-lipid-
like components were identified: phenylacetaldehyde,
2-hydroxy-6-methylbenzaldehyde and an unidentified
aromatic aldehyde. Five of the seven major cutic-
ular hydrocarbon components were also putatively
identified and two positively identified: tridecane and
ethyl Z-11-eicosenoate, peaks 4 and 6 (Fig. 1). Two of
these identified major components (n-tridecane and an
unsaturated hydrocarbon of the same chain length) are
of identical chain length to one found in Acarus immo-
bilis Griffiths.15 The other five were esters of long-chain
fatty acids >C20. ‘Conventional wisdom’ dictates that
these longer-chain lipids (>C20) are the most likely
to be responsible for waterproofing of the cuticle,
as longer-chain hydrocarbons give more protection
against water loss and are non-volatile, so are not
constantly lost through evaporation, as is n-tridecane.
However, all the major cuticular components detected
are liquids at room temperature.
The results reported here are important additions
to current knowledge. The cuticle has been identified
as one of several potential physiological targets for the
development of new acaracides. Not only is the cuticle
an important site for osmoregulation/respiration but it
is also an anchorage for muscles and protects against
physical damage and penetration of pathogens.17 For
example, a current study at this laboratory is looking
to develop an entopathogenic fungal-based biocontrol
agent, and such information is useful when deciding
upon formulation.
The only cuticular lipid detected in significant
amounts on all of the DE products that had been
rinsed off the mites was tridecane (Table 2). This was
perhaps not surprising, as this is the most abundant
lipid available for uptake (Fig. 1). Only in one case did
DE appear to absorb a wider range of A. siro lipids. It
is interesting that these were only found on Protect-It,
which was marginally the most effective DE product
against mites in an earlier study.18 It was surprising
that these two longer-chain lipids (C23:2 and C25:2
FAEEs) were not subsequently redetected at the
longest exposure, but this may indicate that recovery
of these was near the limit of detection of the method.
In contrast, medium chain-free fatty acids – palmitic
acid, stearic acid, oleic acid and linoleic acid – have
been detected by other workers on DE removed
from the bruchids Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and
Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) after only 6.5 h exposure
at 25 ◦C, extracted in hexane and analysed by gas
chromatography.19 However, the amount of lipids
available for extraction from the bruchids would have
been very much higher, and it may have been that the
higher temperature in this study also had an effect,
increasing the rate at which the lipids were removed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are very grateful to their retired
colleague (and research leader) Dr John Chambers
for his encouragement and guidance and his helpful
comments on this manuscript. This work was funded
by the Sustainable and Food Science Group (formerly
the Arable Crops Division) of the Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
REFERENCES
1 Subramanyam B, Swanson CL, Madamanchi N and Nor-
wood S, Effectiveness of Insecto, a new diatomaceous earth
formulation in suppressing several stored-grain insect species,
in Proc 6th International Working Conference on Stored-
product Protection, Canberra, Australia, 1994, ed. by Higley E,
Wright EJ, Banks HJ and Champ BR. CAB International,
Oxford, UK, pp. 650–659 (1994).
2 McLaughlin A, Laboratory trials on desiccant dust insecticides,
in Proc 6th International Working Conference on Stored-
product Protection, Canberra, Australia, 1994, ed. by Higley E,
Wright EJ, Banks HJ and Champ BR. CAB International,
Oxford, UK, pp. 638–645 (1994).
3 Armitage DM and Wildey KB, The Grain Storage Guide, 2nd
edition. Home Grown Cereals Authority, London, UK, 36
pp. (2003).
4 Armitage DM and Chambers J, Preventing and controlling
mites in stored cereals. HGCA Topic Sheet No. 62, 2 pp.
(2002).
5 Cook DA, Insect and mite control in empty grain stores using
DE. HGCA Topic Sheet No. 78, 2 pp. (2004).
6 Armitage DM and Collins DA, Use of chemicals in integrated
grain storage. HGCA Topic Sheet No. 86, 2 pp. (2005).
7 Cook DA and Armitage DM, Integrated pest management for
stored grain in the U.K. incorporating diatomaceous earths
to prevent surface infestations of insects and mites, in
Integrated Protection of Stored Products, IOBC Bulletin No.
3, pp. 221–229 (2002).
8 Cook DA, Collins DA and Collins LE, Efficacy of diatomaceous
earths, applied as structural treatments, against stored product
insects and mites. HGCA Project Report No. 344, 50 pp.
(2004).
9 Ebeling W, Sorptive dusts for pest control. Ann Rev Entomol
16:123–158 (1971).
Pest Manag Sci 64:141–146 (2008)
145
DOI: 10.1002/ps