been reported concerning metal atoms directly attached to
the (tetraphenyl)porphyrin skeleton via a metal-to-carbon σ
bond. Notable examples include direct meso-metalation11 and
ortho-metalation of a pyridylporphyrin.12 In search of novel
peripherally metalated porphyrins, we anticipated that a
robust metal-ligand system would be highly desirable as
the extra-annular metal site. If this metal-ligand system, in
addition, were to have other interesting properties, this would
only add to the impetus of connecting such a system to a
porphyrin. Hence, the metallo-ECE-pincer system (with ECE
pincer being the monoanionic, potentially tridentate ligand
[2,6-(ECH2)2C6H3]- (E ) NR2, SR, PR2)) was selected
because it is known to be chemically robust and because of
its catalytic and physicochemical properties.13,14 Linear,
Hammett-type relations are known between substituents at
the para position with respect to the metal in metallopincers
and both the electron density at the metal and the catalytic
activity of the complexes.15 Since the electronic properties
of a porphyrin can be fine-tuned by the introduction of a
metal, metallopincer-metalloporphyrin hybrid systems might
provide an interesting and novel entry into catalyst modula-
tion. Taking these facts into account, we sought for a way
to combine both (metallo)porphyrin chemistry and metallo-
pincer chemistry and, hence, to construct a molecular hybrid
of both. Because these materials can, in theory, incorporate
a plethora of different metals in both coordination moieties,
we anticipated that their synthesis would provide access to
interesting homo- and heteromultimetallic systems.
Scheme 1a
a (a) pyrrole, propionic acid, reflux; (b) HBr/HOAc, CH2Cl2, rt;
(c) HNMe2, CH2Cl2, rt; (d) LiPPh2-BH3, THF, -40° C; (e)
thiophenol or 4-tert-butylthiophenol, K2CO3, 18-C-6, THF, rt; (f)
Et2NH, THF, reflux.
Since several pincer ligand systems are known (i.e., SCS,
NCN, and PCP), we were interested in synthesizing a
common hybrid ligand precursor. Most of the synthetic routes
to these types of ligands involve nucleophilic substitution
of a benzylic bromine atom by the desired heteroatom-
containing nucleophile. Hence, a tetraphenylporphyrin de-
rivative containing benzyl bromide moieties at all of its 3,5-
phenyl positions would be highly desirable. Thus, starting
from 3,5-dimethylaniline, 3,5-bis(methoxymethyl)benzalde-
hyde 1 was obtained in a 29% overall yield (4 steps) and
subsequently used in an Adler-type condensation reaction
with pyrrole to yield 12% of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3,5-bis-
(methoxymethyl)phenyl) porphyrin 2 (see Scheme 1).
1
The structure of porphyrin 2 was confirmed by H NMR
and 13C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental
analysis, and X-ray crystallography (see Supporting Informa-
tion, Figure S1). Following a modified literature procedure,16
treatment of 2 with HBr/AcOH in CH2Cl2 gave 5,10,15,20-
tetrakis(3,5-bis(bromomethyl)phenyl) porphyrin 3 in 67%
yield.
This compound proved to be an excellent general ligand
precursor for the syntheses of tetrakis(ECE-pincer)porphyrins
4, 5, 6a, and 6b (E ) N, P, and S, respectively; see Scheme
1). Nucleophilic replacements of the bromine atoms by the
appropriate nucleophiles proceeded smoothly under standard
conditions under exclusion of light and molecular oxygen.
Tetrakis(NCN)porphyrin 4 was obtained after treatment of
3 with an excess of dimethylamine in CH2Cl2 as a purple,
crystalline solid in 96% yield. Its structural composition was
confirmed by X-ray crystallography; however, the disorder
in the crystal was too high to warrant publication. Notably,
in contrast to most porphyrins, 4 dissolves in solvents ranging
from polar (MeCN, MeOH) to nonpolar (pentane, hexane)
at room temperature.
(10) For selected examples, see: (a) Wang, H. J. H.; Jaquinod, L.; Nurco,
D. J.; Vicente, M. G. H.; Smith, K. M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2646-2647.
(b) Gryko, D. T.; Zhao, F.; Yasseri, A. A.; Roth, K. M.; Bocian, D. F.;
Kuhr, W.; Lindsey, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7356-7362. (c) Gogan,
N. J.; Siddiqui, Z. U. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50, 720-725.
(11) (a) Arnold, D. P.; Sakata, Y.; Sugiura, K.; Worthington, E. I. Chem.
Commun. 1998, 2331-2332; Arnold, D. P.; Healy, P. C.; Hodgson, M. J.;
Williams, M. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 607, 41-50. (c) Hodgson, M.
J.; Healy, P. C.; Williams, M. L.; Arnold, D. P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2002, 4497-4504. (d) Hartnell, R. D.; Arnold, D. P. Organometallics
2004, 23, 391-399. (e) Hartnell, R. D.; Arnold, D. P. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2004, 6, 1262-1269.
(12) Darling, S. L.; Goh, P. K. Y.; Bampos, N.; Feeder, N.; Montalti,
M.; Prodi, L.; Johnson, B. F. G.; Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Commun. 1998,
2031-2032.
Using LiPPh2-BH3 in THF as a nucleophile, borane-
protected tetrakis(PCP)porphyrin 5BH3 was obtained in 99%
yield. Deprotection with Et2NH quantitatively yielded tet-
rakis(PCP)porphyrin 5. Fourfold platination of 5 by a
transcyclometalation (TCM) reaction17 with NCN-PtCl was
(13) Albrecht, M.; van Koten, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 40, 3750-
3781.
(14) Singleton, J. T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1837-1857.
(15) (a) van de Kuil, L. A.; Luitjes, H.; Grove, D. M.; Zwikker, J. W.;
van der Linden, J. G. M.; Roelofsen, A. M.; Jenneskens, L. W.; Drenth,
W.; van Koten, G. Organometallics 1994, 13, 468-477. (b) Slagt, M. Q.;
Rodr´ıguez, G.; Grutters, M. P.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M.; Klopper, W.;
Jenneskens, L. W.; Lutz, M.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G. Chem. Eur. J.
2004, 10, 1331-1344.
(16) Jux, N. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2129-2132.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 18, 2004
3024