more than two orders higher than those at room temperature.
However, we have not observed emissions at 495 and 600 nm
for o-HBDI as reported in ref. 17 under our examined
conditions (it is noteworthy that the emission in nonpolar
solvents such as C6H12 usually blue-shifts compared to that in
polar solutions such as water). The results clearly showed that
it is the thermal motions that lead to the non-radiative
quenching of o-HBDI at room temperature. This further
supports the existence of an oxazolone-like structure of
o-HBMO because, in the coumarin-like isomer, the labile
proton is not located at a key position that would influence
the thermal motions of the rings. In such a case, an emission
wavelength shift, as observed at À100 1C for o-HBMO,
instead of fluorescence quenching is more reasonable.
transitions among multiple configurations (less likely). A high
E–Z transition energy barrier has been reported in a GFP
analogue (compound 4c in ref. 5).
On the contrary, o-HBMO provided only one set of signals
at low pH and two sets at high pH (Fig. 2). The two sets of
NMR signals are possibly from (1) E- and Z-forms of
o-HBMO or (2) o-HBMO and its coumarin-like isomer. Since
a coumarin-like structure lacks the aryl-alkene bond, its
fluorescence is less likely to be so sensitive to temperatures.
Therefore, the loss of fluorescence at room temperature
implies that the two sets of NMR signals are from E- and
Z-forms of the molecule.
In conclusion, two GFP chromophore analogues o-HBDI
and o-HBMO have been designed and synthesized. A single
atom substitution in the imidazole ring converts non-
fluorescent o-HBDI (f o 0.001) to fluorescent o-HBMO
(f = 0.09) at room temperature. The former lacks a hydrogen-
bond (pKa = 9.1) while the latter emits in a pH-dependent
manner (pKa = 10.7). At À100 1C, both o-HBDI (f = 0.11
and 0.14) and o-HBMO (f = 0.24 and 0.51) possess strong
fluorescence with and without the hydroxyl proton. Although
further investigations are necessary on the detailed mechanism
leading to the difference and the biological implications of the
molecules, the results provide clues to design probes with less
non-radiation quenching.
The studies in different solvents excluded viscosity as the
determining factor for the fluorescence behaviours of the two
molecules. The absence of the intramolecular hydrogen-bond
or only a very weak hydrogen-bond, at least in aqueous
solutions, plays the key role for the quenching of o-HBDI at
room temperature. Correspondingly, the pKa of o-HBDI is 9.1
from UV-vis absorption study, lower than the pKa of about 10
for phenol. At the same time, the hydrogen from the hydroxyl
group could not been detected by NMR in aqueous solution
and can only be detected in organic solvents (see ESIw). These
results suggest that the hydroxyl proton in o-HBDI undergoes
fast exchange with solvent protons.
We are grateful for the financial support of this work by the
NSFC grant 30870491 to W. Y.
Such a weak hydrogen-bond in o-HBDI is unexpected as an
intramolecular hydrogen-bond has been observed in o-HBDI
crystals.17 In addition, compared to o-HBMO, the proton
donor and acceptor for the hydrogen-bond as well as the
allowed configurations are all maintained in o-HBDI. A
TD-DFT calculation has suggested that excited-state intra-
molecular proton transfer via the hydrogen-bond is thermally
favourable with an energy difference of B7.8 kcal molÀ1 for
o-HBDI.17 Clearly, the model did not fully present the real
state of o-HBDI in solution.
The crystal structure of o-HBDI17 and the NOE study on
o-HBMO show that the hydrogen bond connects the hydroxyl
group and the nitrogen atom. To satisfy the O–N distance
requirement for the hydrogen-bond,18 the molecules need to
adopt several irregular bond lengths and angles as found in the
crystal structure of o-HBDI,17 or allow two rings to be twisted
out of the same plane.
Notes and references
1 N. C. Shaner, G. H. Patterson and M. W. Davidson, J. Cell Sci.,
2007, 120, 4247–4260.
2 R. Y. Tsien, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1998, 67, 509–544.
3 X. He, A. F. Bell and P. J. Tonge, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1523–1526.
4 S. Kojima, H. Ohkawa, T. Hirano, S. Maki, H. Niwa, M. Ohashi,
S. Inouye and F. I. Tsuji, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 5239–5242.
5 L. Wu and K. Burgess, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4089–4096.
6 I. V. Yampolsky, A. A. Kislukhin, T. T. Amatov, D. Shcherbo,
V. K. Potapov, S. Lukyanov and K. A. Lukyanov, Bioorg. Chem.,
2008, 36, 96–104.
7 I. V. Yampolsky, S. J. Remington, V. I. Martynov, V. K. Potapov,
S. Lukyanov and K. A. Lukyanov, Biochemistry, 2005, 44,
5788–5793.
8 M. Zimmer, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 759–781.
9 M. Ormo, A. B. Cubitt, K. Kallio, L. A. Gross, R. Y. Tsien and
S. J. Remington, Science, 1996, 273, 1392–1395.
10 F. Yang, L. G. Moss and G. N. Phillips Jr., Nat. Biotechnol., 1996,
14, 1246–1251.
11 J. Dong, K. M. Solntsev and L. M. Tolbert, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 12038–12039.
12 C. W. Cody, D. C. Prasher, W. M. Westler, F. G. Prendergast and
W. W. Ward, Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 1212–1218.
13 A. Follenius-Wund, M. Bourotte, M. Schmitt, F. Iyice, H. Lami,
J. J. Bourguignon, J. Haiech and C. Pigault, Biophys. J., 2003, 85,
1839–1850.
Either of these two configurations enhances the energy level
of the molecules, which needs to be compensated by the
formation of the hydrogen-bond. In solution and at room
temperatures, the strength of the hydrogen-bond in o-HBDI
hardly stabilizes the configuration while that in o-HBMO
does. Currently, we assign this bond energy difference as
resulting from the local electron density difference between
two molecules. The substitution of a nitrogen atom with an
oxygen atom in the imidazole ring provides an additional lone
pair of electrons, which should facilitate the proton relocation.
14 J. Cornforth and M. H. Du, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1991,
2183–2187.
15 D. F. Eaton, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 1988, 2, 523–531.
16 S. Forsen and S. Linse, Trends Biochem. Sci., 1995, 20, 495–497.
17 K. Y. Chen, Y. M. Cheng, C. H. Lai, C. C. Hsu, M. L. Ho,
G. H. Lee and P. T. Chou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
4534–4535.
1
In H NMR spectra, o-HBDI provided one set of signals
at all pHs (Fig. 2), possibly due to the molecule either
having only one major state (more likely) or undergoing fast
18 W. W. Cleland, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2000, 382, 1–5.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
2870 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 2868–2870