Hehlen et al.: Electron–phonon interacting in CsCdBr :Yb3
ϩ
4891
3
Pab . Consequently, the above two ratios would be overesti-
mated, a complication in numerous past studies.4
spatial extent of electron–phonon interactions is estimated to
be approximately 3 Å. These results all have important con-
sequences for phonon-assisted energy transfer and mul-
tiphonon relaxation of RE3 excited states. The present re-
search has shown that vibrational energy release during
relaxation of the electronic excited state of Yb3 occurs
through excitation first of local modes, and subsequently via
energy transfer through resonances with bulk modes which
complete the nonradiative relaxation process. For materials
Instead, we assume that the weakly absorbing vibronic
ϩ
transitions are unaffected by saturation ͑i.e., IϰP͒, and we
1
2
only calculate the ratio I
/I
ϭ S using Eq. ͑3͒ and
a0→b2 a0→b1
ϩ
the spectra of Fig. 5. For the modes B and L we then
obtain Sbulkϭ0.15Ϯ0.03 and Slocalϭ0.010Ϯ0.002, respec-
tively. Note that SbulkϾSlocal . This result reflects the fact that
the relative intensity of the modes B and L in the one-
phonon and two-phonon replica ͑Fig. 5͒ is reversed. Al-
though both Huang–Rhys factors found here are within the
such as RE3 -doped CsCdBr , where local and bulk mode
ϩ
3
frequencies differ markedly, the significant detuning of many
such potential resonances undoubtedly suppresses some re-
laxation pathways.
3ϩ
typical range of values reported for other RE -doped
7
,39
solids,
they indicate quite different electron–phonon cou-
pling strengths of the two modes.
Whereas the configurational coordinate for the A1g local
mode is most likely the ͑average͒ Yb–Br bond length, the
configurational coordinate describing the coupling to the
bulk mode in the second coordination sphere or beyond is
not directly obvious. The relatively large value of Sbulk indi-
cates the occurrence of local structural changes upon excita-
tion of the respective vibronic transitions and, on the basis of
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
M.P.H. gratefully acknowledges support through a Swiss
National Science Foundation fellowship. We thank Naomi
Furer, Karl Kr a¨ mer, and Hans U. G u¨ del, University of Bern,
Switzerland, for growing and preparing the crystal, and
Geoffrey F. Strouse, Los Alamos National Laboratory, for
assistance in the resonant Raman experiments.
both the one-dimensional nature of CsCdBr and the struc-
3
ture of the dominant Yb3 pair center in CsCdBr , we can
ϩ
3
1
speculate on the nature of this structural rearrangement.
From our results on the spatial extension of electron–phonon
interactions ͑Sec. III B͒ we conclude that vibronic coupling
is not only confined to within the linear chains in CsCdBr3
but more specifically does not extend beyond the vibrational
modes of the nearest-neighbor coordination units in the
K. H. Hellwege, Ann. Phys. 40, 529 ͑1941͒.
W. F. Krupke, Phys. Rev. 145, 325 ͑1966͒.
G. Blasse, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 11, 71 ͑1992͒.
G. Blasse, A. Meijerink, and C. de Mello Doneg a´ , J. Alloys Comp. 225,
2
3
4
24 ͑1995͒.
5
L.-S. Lee, S. C. Rand, and A. L. Schawlow, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6901 ͑1984͒.
C. de Mello Doneg a´ and G. Blasse, Chem. Phys. Lett. 183, 367 ͑1991͒.
C. de Mello Doneg a´ , A. Meijerink, and G. Blasse, J. Phys. Condensed
6
7
3
ϩ
chain. With the dominant Yb
Yb -vacancy-Yb
pair center being a
Matter 4, 8889 ͑1992͒.
A. Meijerink, C. de Mello Doneg a´ , A. Ellens, J. Sytsma, and G. Blasse, J.
3ϩ
3ϩ
3ϩ
8
arrangement, the Yb
ion therefore
typically has a ͓CdBr ͔ coordination unit on one side and a
Lumin, 58, 26 ͑1994͒.
A. Meijerink, G. Blasse, J. Sytsma, C. de Mello Doneg a´ , and A. Ellens,
6
9
͓
vacancy-Br ͔ coordination unit on the other side along the
6
Acta Phys. Pol. A 90, 109 ͑1996͒.
G. Blasse and G. J. Dirksen, J. Solid State Chem. 96, 258 ͑1992͒.
G. Meyer, Inorg. Synth. 25, 146 ͑1989͒.
D. Visser, G. C. Verschoor, and D. J. W. Ijdo, Acta Crystallogr. B 36, 28
linear chain. Since the vacancy is likely to be easily com-
pressed, the vibronic excitation of the A1g bulk mode, which
involves stretching of the Cd–Br bonds, may push the Yb3
ion towards the vacancy and thus induce changes in bond
10
11
ϩ
12
͑
1980͒.
13
G. L. McPherson and L. M. Henling, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1889 ͑1977͒.
L. M. Henling and G. L. McPherson, Phys. Rev. B 16, 4756 ͑1977͒.
R. B. Barthem, R. Buisson, and R. L. Cone, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 627
3ϩ
lengths and angles of the bromide ions linking the Yb and
14
15
2
ϩ
the Cd ion. The overall result of this vibronic excitation
would be the introduction of coupling between local and
͑
1989͒.
16
bulk modes and a reduction of the Yb3 –Yb distance.
ϩ
3ϩ
N. J. Cockroft, G. D. Jones, and R. W. G. Syme, J. Lumin. 43, 275 ͑1989͒.
J. P. Chaminade, R. M. Macfarlane, F. Ramaz, and J. C. Vial, J. Lumin.
17
While there is currently no experimental evidence supporting
this picture, we wish to point out that EPR measurements on
a sample strongly excited into the bulk-mode vibronic tran-
4
8&49, 531 ͑1991͒.
1
1
8
9
N. J. Cockroft, G. D. Jones, and D. C. Nguyen, Phys. Rev. B 45, 5187
1992͒.
͑
´
ore,
Ϫ1
F. Ramaz, R. M. Macfarlane, J. C. Vial, J. P. Chaminade, and F. Made
J. Lumin. 55, 173 ͑1993͒.
M. P. Hehlen and H. U. Gudel, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1768 ͑1993͒.
sition at 162.5 cm could provide direct information on the
magnitude of this structural rearrangement.14
2
2
0
1
¨
Ph. Goldner, F. Pell e´ , D. Meichenin, and F. Auzel, J. Lumin. 71, 137
1997͒.
͑
2
2
2
2
3
4
IV. CONCLUSIONS
J. P. Mathieu, Spectres de Vibration et Symmetrie ͑Herman et Cie, Paris,
945͒.
1
The incorporation of Yb3 into CsCdBr leads to the
ϩ
3
D. L. Rousseau, R. P. Bauman, and S. P. S. Porto, J. Raman Spectrosc. 10,
253 ͑1981͒.
G. L. McPherson and A. M. McPherson, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 41, 495
formation of ͓YbBr ͔ coordination units, the vibrational
6
properties of which differ markedly from those of the host
lattice. From a comparison of Raman spectra which probe
host vibrations, and Yb3 luminescence excitation spectra
which provide a probe of local vibrations, we have shown
that vibronic coupling occurs predominantly to modes of the
first coordination sphere, and that vibronic contributions
from the second or higher coordination sphere are weak. The
͑
1980͒.
25
C. W. Tomblin, G. D. Jones, and R. W. G. Syme, J. Phys. C 17, 4345
͑1984͒.
O. Pilla, E. Cazzanelli, B. Blanzat, C. Andraud, and F. Pell e´ , Phys. Status
Solidi B 144, 845 ͑1987͒.
G. L. McPherson and Jin Rong Chang, Inorg. Chem. 12, 1196 ͑1973͒.
M. P. Hehlen, K. Kr a¨ mer, H. U. G u¨ del, R. A. McFarlane, and R. N.
ϩ
2
2
6
7
28
Schwartz, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 475 ͑1994͒.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 107, No. 13, 1 October 1997
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
129.174.21.5 On: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 21:59:36