Chemistry Letters Vol.35, No.3 (2006)
285
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
100
shown in Figure 2a, the selectivity has increased with narrowing
the reaction channel at a given retention time, and thus the appli-
cation of micro channels can prevent the reduction in reaction ef-
ficiency due to the coking on the surface of Pd membrane.
We investigated the recovery of hydrogen at perm-side
(
a)
90
Selectivity
Micro–3
Micro–2
Micro–1 80
Normal
(
Figure 2b). The recovery has been defined as permeation
7
6
0
0
amount of hydrogen divided by all amount of produced hydro-
gen. The application of micro channels increased these values
at a given retention time, despite an increase in produced hydro-
gen due to the enhancement of cyclohexane conversion. This
result is attributable to an increase in hydrogen distribution ratio
at perm-side due to decreasing the volume at react-side. The
increase in hydrogen recovery is another advantage arising from
narrowing a reaction channel.
Conversion
Micro–3
Micro–2
Micro–1
Normal
0
50
0
.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Retention Time at React-Side / min
8
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
(
b)
Narrowing a reaction channel extends the surface area per
volume of Pd membrane. Micro-1, Micro-2, Micro-3, and the
normal reactor have each surface area per volume of 2.4, 2.7,
2
ꢁ1
3
.3, and 2.0 mm mL , respectively. The yield of benzene was
Micro–3
Micro–2
Micro–1
Normal
affected by varying the surface area per volume of Pd mem-
brane, and these values enhanced approximately two times as
compared to the value with normal reactor at 0.05 min as reten-
tion time (Figure 2c). This result evidently indicates one of the
advantages of microreactor for dehydrogenation of cyclohexane,
namely, the increase in catalytic reaction on Pd membrane due to
the increase in the surface area per volume of Pd membrane, as
discussed above.
0
0
.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Retention Time at React-Side / min
Micro–3
1
1
2
0
(c)
In this study, the significant effects of applying micro chan-
nels have been found on dehydrogenation of cyclohexane in the
simple manner; despite constructing a microreactor has been
conventionally regarded difficult and/or expensive. The im-
provement in cyclohexane dehydrogenation with decreasing
channel size is mainly caused by catalytic reaction on the Pd
membrane. The dehydrogenation efficiencies should be able to
further increase by a combination of any other catalysts and/or
pressure control in the reactors. We anticipate some advantages
of the micro channels to benzene hydrogenation.
Micro–2
Micro–1
Normal
8
6
4
2
0
1
.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2
–1
Surface Area per Volume / mm µL
Figure 2. (a) Dependence of cyclohexane conversion, selectiv-
ity to benzene and (b) hydrogen recovery at perm-side on reten-
tion time at react-side, and (c) dependence of benzene yield on
Pd membrane surface area per volume (retention time: 0.05
min) during dehydrogenation of cyclohexane in microreactors.
Micro-1, Micro-2, Micro-3, and normal had each fluid channel
of 600, 500, 370, and 2000-mm width.
The research was financially supported by the Project of
Micro-Chemical Technology for Productions, Analysis and
Measurement Systems of NEDO in Japan. We appreciate to
NEDO for their support.
References
1
2
3
W. Ehrfeld, V. Hessel, H. L o¨ we, Microreactors: New Technology
for Modern Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000, Chap. 1;
K. F. Jensen, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 293; G. Kolb, V. Hessel,
Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 98, 1.
N. Itoh, AIChE J. 1987, 33, 1576; N. F. Gr u¨ nenfelder, T. H.
Schucan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1989, 14, 579; A. M. Mondal,
S. Illas, Sep. Sci. Technol. 2001, 36, 1101; R. Dittmeyer, V.
H o¨ llein, K. Daub, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 173, 135.
S. Niwa, M. Eswaramoorthy, J. Nair, A. Raj, N. Itoh, H. Shoji, T.
Namba, F. Mizukami, Science 2002, 295, 105; K. Sato, S. Niwa, T.
Hanaoka, K. Komura, T. Namba, F. Mizukami, Catal. Lett. 2004,
96, 107.
ered mainly caused by heterogeneous catalytic reaction on the
Pd membrane. The improvement in cyclohexane conversion
with decreasing channel size is, therefore, attributable not to
the transition of thermodynamic equilibrium due to hydrogen
segregation but to the enhancement of catalytic dehydrogenation
due to increasing the surface area per volume of Pd membrane.
For all four reactors, more than 98% of the molecular balan-
ces of carbon and hydrogen were obtained form benzene, hydro-
gen gas, and cyclohexane at outlet flow. However, the values of
selectivity below 80% were observed (Figure 2a). It is supposed
that the insufficiency of produced benzene is caused by deposi-
tion of some carbon compounds on the surface of Pd membrane.
Actually, slight decreases in cyclohexane conversion and hydro-
gen recovery with time were observed through a repetition of de-
hydrogenation reaction, and this reduction in reaction efficiency
was restored by a treatment with oxygen flow at 573 K. As
4
5
6
R. Dittmeyer, V. H o¨ llein, K. Daub, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001,
1
73, 135; A. G. Dixon, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2003, 1, R6.
R. F. Goldstein, The Petroleum Chemicals Industry, 2nd ed., E. &
F. N. Spon, London, 1958, p. 218.
T. C. Brown, K. D. King, T. T. Nguyen, J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90,
4
19; S. R. Smith, A. S. Gordon, J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65, 1124;
S. E. Orchard, B. A. Thrush, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1974,
337, 257.