Photodissociation Dynamics of n-Butylbenzene Molecular Ion
J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 100, No. 32, 1996 13371
ment via a distonic ion intermediate (DII) as shown in Scheme
1
. The reaction occurs on a double-well potential energy
surface, the first step being rate-determining while the second
step determines the KERD.
As the first step to investigate the dynamics of this reaction,
the KERD determined in this work is compared with the
prediction from a statistical theory. The phase space theory
32
formalism which is easily applicable to dissociation occurring
via a loose transition state without a reverse barrier would be
adequate for this purpose.
E-E0-T
n(T;J,E) ∝
∫
F(E - E - T - R)P(T,J,R) dR (7)
0
Rm
Here, n(T;J,E) is the KERD at a given angular momentum J
and internal energy E. The root-mean-square average J value
Figure 6. The 91/92 branching ratio as a function of n-butylbenzene
ion internal energy. The present photodissociation results are shown
as filled circles (b). The PEPICO results of Baer et al. (0) and PD-
ICR results of Dunbar and co-workers (4) are also shown. The solid
curve represents the theoretical result calculated from the rate-energy
curves in Figures 7 and 8 at 298 K.
3
3
evaluated at the ion source temperature has been used. F and
P are the product vibrational and angular momentum state
densities, respectively. R is the product rotational energy and
Rm is its minimum. E0 is the reaction critical energy which
may be set equal to the reaction endoergicity at 0 K under the
assumption of an extremely loose transition state. According
to Scheme 1, 5-methylene-1,3-cyclohexadiene ion and propene
are the reaction products. The heat of formation of the ionic
product is not well established. The values of E0 estimated from
the PEPICO and PD-ICR data in Figure 6. The original PD-
2
1
ICR data reported by Dunbar and co-workers have been
corrected for the thermal energy. Agreement among the data
is remarkable considering that the three methods being compared
operate on totally different principles. The results render a
partial support to the general validity of the present PD-MIKES
techniques, the method for the internal energy estimation in
particular.
2
1,31
two recent heats of formation data
(Table 2) are 1.07 and
1
.27 eV. E0 of 1.17 eV, average of the two, has been used in
the present calculation. KERDs have been calculated at various
internal energies and averaged over the internal energy distribu-
tions for the molecular ions undergoing MID and photodisso-
It has been generally accepted that the 91/92 ratios reported
by Beynon and co-workers15 in the photodissociation of
34,35
ciation, respectively. The molecular parameters
used in the
n-butylbenzene ion generated by 70 eV electron ionization
deviate from other results due to the neglect of the internal
energy of the ion getting photoexcited. In this regard, we have
measured the 91/92 ratios in PD-MIKES of molecular ions
generated by 70 eV electron ionization also. These are 0.23,
calculations are listed in Table 3. Theoretical KERDs shown
in Figure 4a,b agree with the experimental ones virtually within
error limits, respectively. It is to be noted that rearrangement
reactions usually display kinetic energy releases much larger
3
6
than statistical predictions. Hence, the above results indicate
that the separation of the ionic and neutral products in reaction
0.54, and 0.66 at 607.5, 514.5, and 488.0 nm excitations, re-
spectively. These values are smaller than reported by Beynon
and co-workers. Such a difference is thought to arise from the
fact that ions are irradiated perpendicularly near the intermediate
focal point in the present experiment while the entire second
field-free region was irradiated by Beynon and co-workers.
Comparing the present results with the solid curve in Figure 6
which is the energy dependent 91/92 ratio obtained through
RRKM-QET fitting to be described later, the average internal
energies of 3.14, 3.60, and 3.74 eV are estimated for the
photoexcited molecular ions with 607.5, 514.5, and 488.0 nm,
respectively. (Since the solid curve has been estimated at 298
K, the additional rotational energy of 0.02 eV at 473 K, the ion
source temperature in this photodissociation experiment, is
added.) Then, subtracting the photon energies, the average
internal energies of molecular ions getting photoexcited esti-
mated from 607.5, 514.5, and 488.0 nm experiments become
1
occurs via a loose transition state without a significant reverse
barrier over a microsecond to nanosecond time scale, in
agreement with Scheme 1.
The rate constant for this reaction has been calculated with
2
,3
the RRKM-QET formalism.
q
W (E - E )
0
k(E) ) σ
(8)
hF(E)
q
Here, F is the density of states of the reactant ion, W is the
state sum at the transition state, and σ is the reaction path
degeneracy. Since the difference in the external rotational
moments of inertia between the reactant and the transition state
is generally ignored, the rotational energy has not been included
in the estimation of the ion internal energy. In a usual RRKM
fitting of rate-energy data for a particular channel, the critical
1.10, 1.19, and 1.20 eV, respectively. The molecular ions
q
energy and the activation entropy at 1000 K (∆S ) are treated
getting photoexcited possess ∼1.16 eV of internal energy, the
value being remarkably consistent in the three experiments. This
suggests overall validity of the present method again. Also,
this supports the argument that the neglect of the ion internal
energy in the previous ion-beam photodissociation experiment
was responsible for its mismatch with other data.
37
as two parameters to be adjusted. These two parameters have
been varied to fit both the present and PEPICO rate constant
data. Assuming that the isomerization in Scheme 1 is the rate-
determining step, a C-H stretching mode (3000 cm ) has been
taken as the reaction coordinate and σ of 2 has been used. Even
-1
2
7
-1
C. Production of C7H8•+. As was pointed out in an earlier
though Baer et al. took a 910 cm mode as the reaction
section, the rate-energy dependence for this channel measured
SCHEME 1
with PEPICO27 required the participation of a tight transition
2
8
state while the KERD measured by Holmes and Osborne
indicated dissociation via a loose transition state. To accom-
modate these apparently conflicting results, Baer et al. suggested
that the reaction occur by the stepwise MaLafferty rearrange-