ChemComm
Communication
hydrophobic aromatic shell that makes the molecule hardly soluble of the fluorescent behaviour observed for H+@Py-TPE and
in water–ethanol mixtures. However, the experimental results show M3+@Py-TPE (M = Cr, Fe, Al) indicates that the colorimetric and
that Cr3+@Py-TPE, Fe3+@Py-TPE and Al3+@Py-TPE exhibit identical ratiometric responses of Py-TPE to M3+ come intrinsically from a
fluorescent behaviour and no precipitates have been observed for proton-binding-induced fluorescence change.
the three systems (Fig. 2B, Fig. S6 and S7, ESI†). Furthermore, the
In summary, pyridinyl-functionalized TPE (Py-TPE) has been
absorption spectra of Cr3+@Py-TPE, Fe3+@Py-TPE and Al3+@Py-TPE synthesized and displays weak blue FL in solution. When various
systems all show evidently red-shifted absorption bands as mono-, di- and trivalent metal cations were added into the Py-TPE
compared to Py-TPE (Fig. S8 to S11, ESI†). These results indicate ethanol solution, only Fe3+, Cr3+ and Al3+ can alter the emission
that the addition of M3+ to Py-TPE ethanol solution must have feature from weak blue to strong red. By analyzing the similarity
triggered the formation of new species in the mixture.
between the fluorescent responses of Py-TPE to Fe3+, Cr3+ and Al3+
We next turned our attention to the pyridinyl moiety on Py-TPE and comparing the Ksp values of M(OH)n for all the measured metal
which is a typical proton acceptor. Since water–ethanol mixture was cations, we deduced that the red emission band originates from
used as the detection medium, it is possible to capture protons. protonated Py-TPE. This deduction has been validated by both a
Moreover, checking the database of Ksp (the constant of solubility comparative study of the fluorescent responses of Py-TPE to TFA in
product) of M(OH)n (n = 1, 2, and 3 for M+, M2+, and M3+ different concentrations and theoretical predictions. It is concluded
respectively), we found that Fe(OH)3, Al(OH)3 and Cr(OH)3 are the that the differentiated FL response of Py-TPE to M3+ over other tested
smallest three in all of our tested metal cations.13 Meanwhile, the M2+ and M+ ions depends on the higher hydrolyzing ability of the
order of Ksp for Fe(OH)3, Al(OH)3 and Cr(OH)3 is completely M3+, which releases more protons in the water–ethanol mixture. This
consistent with the order of I630/I488 shown in Fig. 1B. It implies fluorescent detection of trivalent cations is achieved by a mechanism
that M3+ is intensively hydrolyzed in water according to the master distinct from literature reported ones. The colorimetric (blue to red)
3Àx
equation M3+ + xH2O 2 M(OH)x
+ xH+. Thus the addition of and ratiometric (I630 vs. I488) characteristics of this kind of fluorescent
M3+ aqueous solution into Py-TPE ethanol solution is equivalent to probe have their own advantages. In addition, the emission maxima
the addition of acid. at 630 and 488 nm perfectly match with red and blue laser sources.
Following this concept, we investigated the influence of protons This colorimetric and ratiometric FL probe may find promising
on the FL behavior of Py-TPE. As shown in Fig. 3, on adding applications as an active element of chemo- and biosensors.
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) into Py-TPE ethanol solution, the FL
This work was supported by the National Science Founda-
features gradually change. The red emission peak at 630 nm tion of China (51273175); the key project of the Ministry of
manifests in the spectra at a TFA concentration ([TFA]) of 4 mM. Science and Technology of China (2013CB834704), the
This red band becomes predominant when [TFA] is equal to and/or Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (603509, HKUST2/
higher than 8 mM. The blue emission of Py-TPE (peak at 488 nm) CRF/10, and 604711), and the University Grants Committee of
vanishes when [TFA] is equal to or higher than 40 mM. The proton- Hong Kong (AoE/P-03/08).
induced changes in FL intensity and colour are demonstrated by
the plot of I630/I488 vs. [TFA] and the images in the inset of Fig. 3B.
In addition, there exists an isosbestic point at 535 nm in Fig. 3A,
which indicates that the blue and red emission bands are ascribed
Notes and references
1 J. B. Vincent, Nutr. Rev., 2000, 58, 67.
2 A. M. Zayed and N. Terrey, Plant Soil, 2003, 249, 139.
to Py-TPE and protonated Py-TPE species, respectively (inset of
Fig. 3B, Fig. S12, ESI†). Theoretical calculations suggest that the
protonated Py-TPE, as compared to Py-TPE, has an extended
conjugation and a narrowed energy gap (Fig. S13, ESI†). Thus the
protonated species can emit red FL. The remarkable homology
3 E. Delhaize and P. R. Ryan, Plant Physiol., 1995, 107, 315.
4 (a) S. K. Sahoo, D. Sharma, R. K. Bera, G. Crisponi and J. F. Callan,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 7195; (b) N. F. Olivieri, N. Engl. J. Med.,
1999, 341, 99.
5 (a) Y. Lei, Y. Su and J. Huo, J. Lumin., 2011, 131, 2521; (b) W. Liu,
S. Pu, D. Jiang, S. Cui, G. Liu and C. Fan, Microchim. Acta, 2011,
174, 329; (c) Z. Zhou, M. Yu, H. Yang, K. Huang, F. Li, T. Yi and
C. Huang, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3387.
´
6 A. Barba-Bon, A. M. Costero, S. Gil, M. Parra, J. Soto, R. Martınez-
´˜
Manez and F. Sancenon, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3000.
7 X. Qu, Q. Liu, X. Ji, H. Chen, Z. Zhou and Z. Shen, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 4600.
8 Y. Han, Y. You, Y. Lee and W. Nam, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 2748.
9 Y. Lu, S. Huang, Y. Liu, L. Zhao and X. Zeng, Org. Lett., 2011,
13, 5274.
10 T. Y. Han, X. Feng, B. Tong, J. B. Shi, L. Chen, J. G. Zhi and
Y. P. Dong, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 416.
11 (a) Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,
40, 5361; (b) S. Zhang, A. Qin, J. Z. Sun and B. Z. Tang, Prog. Chem.,
2011, 23, 623; (c) Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 4332.
12 (a) Q. Zhao, X. A Zhang, Q. Wei, J. Wang, X. Y. Shen, A. Qin, J. Z. Sun
and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 11671; (b) Q. Zhao, K. Li,
S. Chen, A. Qin, D. Ding, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, B. Liu, J. Z. Sun and
B. Z. Tang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 15128; (c) Q. Zhao, S. Zhang,
Y. Liu, J. Mei, S. Chen, P. Lu, A. Qin, Y. Ma, J. Z. Sun and B. Z. Tang,
J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 7387.
Fig. 3 (A) FL spectra of Py-TPE in ethanol solutions with different concentrations
of trifluoroacetic acid or TFA ([TFA]). (B) Plot of I630/I488 versus [TFA]. The inset of
(B) displays FL images taken under UV light (lex = 365 nm) for the solutions
containing different amounts of TFA. [Py-TPE] = 10 mM. The inset chemical
equation shows the formation of protonated Py-TPE upon acceptance of a
proton by the pyridinyl moiety.
13 At 25 1C, for Al(OH)3, Cr(OH)3, and Fe(OH)3, Ksp = 4.6 Â 10À33
,
1.0 Â 10À33, and 3.0 Â10À39, respectively.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1503--1505 1505