Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
3806
X. Liu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3805–3807
Cl
N
N
N
H
N
NR2
N
Cl
N
N
N
TBSO
OTBS
HO
O
11
R=H
a
OH
N
N
12 R=Boc
N
NH
c
b
TBSO
TBSO
NR2
HO
13
NH2
R=H
1
2
14 R=Boc
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Entecavir (1). Reagents and conditions: (a) Ref. 19; (b) DEAD, Ph3P, THF, 0 °C, 30 min, 94%; (c) 2 N HCl, THF, reflux, 6 h, 90%.
lengthy, inefficient, or involving hazardous conditions, expensive
starting materials or reagents. Herein, we report a novel and effi-
cient approach for the synthesis of intermediate 2 which needs only
eight steps using propargyl alcohol as the starting material. In addi-
tion, we performed a modified Mitsunobu reaction to introduce the
guanine ring in high yield.
via modified Mitsunobu coupling22 in high yield are novel aspects
of this work. This proposed synthetic route is straightforward, flex-
ible, and effective.
Acknowledgment
Our synthetic approach ensues from the following analysis of 1
(Scheme 1). The guanine may be introduced via Mitsunobu cou-
pling of the key intermediate 2 and a substituted purine, while
the exomethylene in 2 may be expected to be formed through
DA-TMS mediated epoxide isomerization of the advanced interme-
diate 3 bearing appropriate groups. The densely functionalized
cyclopentane 3 could be achieved by VO(acac)2-catalyzed OH-di-
rected syn-epoxidation reaction from 4, which can be synthesized
from 5 under a ring closing metathesis (RCM) reaction. Compound
5 could be accessed from the easily prepared alcohol 6.
This work was partly supported by Beijing Union Pharmaceuti-
cal Factory and we thank Beijing Funsea Technology Co., Ltd for
chiral HPLC analysis.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
058.
Based on the retrosynthetic analysis, our synthetic approach to
the key intermediate 2 began with the known epoxy alcohol 6
(Scheme 2). In the previous reports, compound 6 was readily pre-
pared from Indium-mediated regioselective allylation of propargyl
alcohol with allyl bromide,6 followed by Katsuki-Sharpless process.
Copper-catalyzed addition of epoxide 6 with Grignard reagent gave
diol 97,8 regioselectively, which was converted into corresponding
TBS protected (3R,4S)-diene 59 by selective protection of the
primary hydroxyl group, followed by RCM reaction10 to furnish
cyclopentanol 411 in 93% yield. The epoxy was introduced stereose-
lectively by taking advantage of the hydroxyl group of 4 via VO(a-
cac)2-catalyzed OH-directed syn-epoxidation reaction using t-
BuOOH as the oxidant,12 providing the desired stereoisomer 1013
in high yield. After the secondary hydroxyl group was protected
by TBS,14 the requisite substituted cyclopentenol 215 was obtained
in high yield with complete regioselectivity by treatment of TBS
ether 3 with diethyl-aluminum 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidide
(DA-TMP) via epoxide isomerization.16
Although direct Mitsunobu coupling between 2 and 6-chloro-2-
aminopurine 11 (Scheme 3) proved to be feasible, the yield (55–
65%) of the coupling reaction is moderate and the reaction requires
a large excess of 11 (>2.5 equiv) due to low solubility of 11 under
typical Mitsunobu condition.17 Literature reported that N-6-ami-
no-bis-Boc-protected adenine, compared with adenine, is a supe-
rior Mitsunobu substrate in that it is completely soluble in THF,
and it could undergo efficient Mitsunobu coupling with versatility
of substituted cyclopentan(en)ols.18 Based on the similar consider-
ation, we tested compound 12.19 To our delight, when we treated 2
with 12 under mild condition (THF, PPh3, DEAD, 0 °C), the coupling
product 1420 could be formed in excellent yield (94%). Finally, both
the silyl groups and Boc groups were deprotected with 2.0 N HCl/
THF in one pot to afford the target compound 121 in good yield
(90%).
References and notes
1. Innaimo, S. F.; Sieffer, M.; Bisacchi, G. S.; Standring, N.; Zahler, R.; Colonno, R. J.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1444.
2. Deman, R. A.; Wolters, L. M. M.; Neven, F.; Chua, D.; Sherman, M.; Lai, C. L.;
Gadano, A.; Lee, Y.; Mazzotta, F.; Thomas, N.; DeHertogh, D. Hepatology 2001,
34, 578.
3. Kwak, M. S.; Choi, J. W.; Lee, J. S.; Kim, K. A.; Suh, J. H.; Cho, Y. S.; Won, S. Y.;
Park, B. K.; Lee, C. K. J. Viral Hepat. 2011, 18, 432.
4. Chang, T. T.; Lai, C. L.; Yoon, S. K.; Lee, S. S.; Coelho, H. S. M.; Carrilho, F. J.;
Poordad, F.; Halota, W.; Horsmans, Y.; Tsai, N.; Zhang, H.; Tenney, D. J.; Tamez,
R.; Iloeje, U. Hepatology 2010, 51, 422.
5. (a) Ziegler, F. E.; Sarpong, M. A. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9013; (b) Zhou, B.; Li, Y. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 502; (c) Bisacchi, G. S.; Chao, S. T.; Bachard, C.; Daris,
J. P.; Innaimo, S.; Jacobs, G. A.; Kocy, O.; Lapointe, P.; Martel, A.; Merchant, Z.;
Slusarchyk, W. A.; Sundeen, J. E.; Young, M. G.; Colonno, R.; Zahler, R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 127; (d) Bisacchi, G. S.; Sundeen, J. E. W.O. Patent
9809964, 1998.; (e) Pendri, Y. R.; Chen, C. P. H.; Patel, S. S. et al. U. S. Patent
0192912, 2004.; (f) Guo, L. W.; Xiao, Y. J.; Yang, L. P. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2006, 17,
907; (g) Zhou, M. X.; Reiff, E. A. et al. U. S. Patent 7786300, 2010.
6. Ranu, B. C.; Majee, A. Chem. Commun. 1997, 13, 1225.
7. (a) Ma, S. M.; Ni, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3286. Compound 6: ½a D20
ꢀ32.0 (c
ꢁ
0.15, CHCl3); ee 93.8%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.89–5.76 (m, 1H), 5.19–
5.11 (m, 2H), 3.95–3.91 (m, 1H), 3.68–3.63 (m, 1H), 3.08–3.04 (m, 1H), 2.99–
2.96 (m, 1H), 2.37 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 132.7, 117.7,
61.5, 57.8, 54.7, 35.6. The enantiomeric excess was assessed by chiral HPLC
analysis of the corresponding para-toluenesulfonate (chiral OD column
0.46 ꢂ 15 cm, n-hexane/i-prOH = 24:1, 1.0 mL minꢀ1, rt).; For
a review on
Katski-Sharpless epoxidation, see: (b) Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S. Org. React. 1996,
48, 1–299; (c) The use of NaIO4 is for oxidative cleavage of minor amount of
1,2-diol byproduct, see: Ref. 7a
8. Compound 9: ½a D20
ꢁ
ꢀ4.9 (c 1.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.88–5.77
(m, 1H), 5.18 (s, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (s, 1H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 3.89–
3.80 (m, 2H), 3.70 (dd, J = 10.8, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.41–2.38 (m, 1H), 2.29–2.24 (m,
1H), 2.14–2.06 (m, 1H), 1.71 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 143.4, 134.4,
118.8, 113.7, 73.0, 65.0, 54.0, 40.2, 21.6; HR-MS (ESI) calcd for C9H17O2Na
(M+Na)+: 179.1048, found 179.1053.
9. Compound 5: ½a D20
ꢁ
ꢀ25.2 (c 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.94–5.90
(m, 1H), 5.11 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (s, 1H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 4.75 (s, 1H), 3.92–3.78
(m, 3H), 2.35–2.31 (m, 1H), 2.28–2.22 (m, 1H), 2.17–2.11 (m, 1H), 1.71 (s, 3H),
0.90 (s, 9H), 0.08 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 143.6, 135.5, 116.9,
113.4, 74.0, 66.9, 53.3, 39.8, 25.8, 22.0, 18.1, ꢀ5.6, ꢀ5.6; HR-MS (ESI) calcd for
C
15H31O2Si (M+H)+: 271.2088, found 271.2087.
In summary, a simple, convenient, and efficient synthesis of
Entecavir has been developed. Using a RCM reaction followed by
VO(acac)2-catalyzed OH-directed syn-epoxidation reaction, the
DA-TMP mediated epoxide isomerization for constructing the chi-
ral substituted cyclopentanol 2, and finally introducing the purine
10. Grubbs, R. H.; Tumas, W. Science 1989, 243, 907.
11. Compound 4: ½a D20
ꢁ
+34.0 (c 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.32 (s,
1H), 4.34–4.29 (m, 1H), 3.85 (dd, J = 9.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H),
2.64–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.21–2.16 (m, 1H), 1.66 (s, 3H), 0.9 (s, 9H), 0.10 (s, 6H); 13
C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) d 138.1, 123.4, 64.1, 59.2, 39.9, 25.9, 18.2, 15.3, ꢀ5.5,
ꢀ5.5; HR-MS (ESI) calcd for C13H27O2Si (M+H)+: 243.1775, found 243.1772.